throbber
Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 436 Filed 10/01/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 26561
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 14-cv-1430-LPS
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`EMERGENCY MOTION REGARDING RON EPSTEIN’S DEPOSITION
`TO START ON OCTOBER 4, 2021
`
`Plaintiff Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC respectfully requests that the Court order that the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`deposition of Ron Epstein proceed on Monday, October 4 as contemplated by this Court’s order on
`
`September 24, 2021. As Your Honor knows, Samsung requested four days for Ron Epstein’s
`
`deposition, split into two separate two-day blocks. Elm opposed Samsung’s request to split Mr.
`
`Epstein’s deposition into non-consecutive days. In briefing that issue to the Court, Samsung
`
`confirmed that it was prepared to proceed with the deposition on October 4 as the parties had
`
`previously agreed:
`
`In light of the asymmetry in protections the parties have against potential discovery
`abuse, Samsung is willing to proceed with a consecutive four-day deposition of
`Epstein beginning October 4 . . . .
`
`(D.I. 433 at 11 (emphasis added).)
`
`A week ago, on September 24, 2021, this Court denied Samsung’s request that the
`
`deposition occur on non-consecutive days. (D.I. 434.) Given this Court’s order, Elm continued
`
`preparing Mr. Epstein for the deposition that was scheduled to occur a week later, expending
`
`significant time and resources.
`
`At 7:38 p.m. ET on Thursday night before Mr. Epstein’s deposition was to begin on
`
`Monday, Samsung’s counsel attempted to unilaterally postpone the deposition. (See Ex. 1 at 3.)
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 436 Filed 10/01/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 26562
`
`Samsung claimed that it needed to move the deposition to afford it time to review any additional
`
`documents the Court orders Elm to produce from what it submitted in camera earlier this week. (Id.)
`
`To alleviate that concern, Elm’s counsel offered to proceed with three of the four days of Mr.
`
`Epstein’s deposition on Monday, October 4 as planned but reserve the fourth day for a later,
`
`mutually convenient date in the event it is necessary based on the Court’s ruling related to the in
`
`camera documents. (Id. at 1.) The next morning, on October 1, Samsung’s counsel refused that offer,
`
`claiming that the deposition could not proceed because Samsung never agreed to proceed on
`
`October 4 despite its statement to the Court otherwise.
`
`Both Mr. Epstein and Elm’s counsel have now spent significant time preparing for the
`
`deposition and have blocked off nearly an entire week for this deposition. Allowing Samsung to
`
`delay this long-planned deposition will burden both the witness and Elm’s counsel who all have
`
`other significant time commitments that make finding nearly a week for a deposition difficult.
`
`Therefore, Elm respectfully requests that the Court issue an order requiring Samsung to depose Mr.
`
`Epstein beginning on October 4 for four consecutive days as previously planned and ordered. Elm
`
`is available for an emergency teleconference at the Court’s convenience today if necessary.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 436 Filed 10/01/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 26563
`
`October 1, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Brian E. Farnan__________
`Brian E. Farnan (#4089)
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`Michael J. Farnan (#5165)
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`FARNAN LAW LLP
`919 North Market Street
`12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Tel: (302) 777-0300
`Fax: (302) 777-0301
`
`John M. Hughes (pro hac vice)
`john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com
`Nosson D. Knobloch (pro hac vice)
`nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com
`Katherine L.I. Hacker (pro hac vice)
`kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com
`Daniel C. Taylor (pro hac vice)
`dan.taylor@bartlitbeck.com
`BARTLIT BECK LLP
`1801 Wewatta Street, Suite 1200
`Denver, CO 80202
`Tel: (303) 592-3100
`Fax: (303) 592-3140
`
`Matthew R. Ford (pro hac vice)
`matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com
`BARTLIT BECK LLP
`54 W. Hubbard Street, Suite 300
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Tel: (312) 494-4400
`Fax: (312) 494-4440
`
`Adam K. Mortara (pro hac vice)
`adam@mortaralaw.com
`125 South Wacker Dr., Suite 300
`Chicago, IL 60606
`Tel: (773) 750-7154
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket