`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al.,
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 14-cv-1430-LPS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`C.A. No. 14-cv-1431-LPS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`C.A. No. 14-cv-1432-LPS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`SK HYNIX INC., et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION
`TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`The Court, having considered Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Amend the Scheduling
`
`Order;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01432-LPS Document 289-2 Filed 06/29/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 17945
`
`
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case schedule is amended as follows:
`
`Event
`Substantial completion of document production; exchange
`of privilege logs
`Deadline to serve interrogatories, requests for admission,
`and Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notices
`Deadline to serve all other fact deposition notices
`Fact discovery closes
`Elm elects no more than 36 total claims and provides final
`infringement contentions
`Defendants’ responses to contention interrogatories related
`to infringement
`Defendants elect no more than 36 prior art references and
`provide final invalidity contentions
`Elm’s responses to contention interrogatories related to
`invalidity
`Opening expert reports
`Responsive expert reports
`Expert discovery closes
`Case dispositive and Daubert motions
`Responses to case dispositive and Daubert motions
`Replies to case dispositive and Daubert motions
`Hearing on pending dispositive and Daubert motions
`Rule 16 Conference
`Deadline for Elm to provide a draft pretrial order to all other
`parties
`
`Deadline for all other parties to provide Elm and each other
`party with their responses to Elm’s draft order
`
`Deadline for the parties to file a joint proposed statement
`setting forth their positions regarding trial sequencing and
`scheduling
`
`Pretrial conference
`First jury trial (second and third jury trial to be determined
`by the Court)
`Deadline for the parties to jointly submit a form of order to
`enter judgment on the verdict and to submit a joint status
`report (should they wish to file one), indicating among other
`things how the case should proceed and listing any post-trial
`motions each party intends to file
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Deadline
`8/28/2020
`
`9/25/2020
`
`11/10/2020
`1/15/2021
`2/5/2021
`
`2/19/2021
`
`2/26/2021
`
`3/16/2021
`
`4/6/2021
`5/3/2021
`6/1/2021
`6/21/2021
`7/12/2021
`7/19/2021
`TBD
`TBD
`30 days before the pretrial
`order is to be filed with the
`Court
`14 days before the pretrial
`order is to be filed with the
`Court
`Third business day before
`the date of the Pretrial
`Conference
`(6 p.m. ET)
`TBD
`TBD
`
`7 days after each jury
`verdict
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01432-LPS Document 289-2 Filed 06/29/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 17946
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: __________________, 2020
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`The Honorable Leonard P. Stark,
`Chief, United States District Judge
`
`
`
`3
`
`