throbber
Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 1 of 70 PageID #: 18464
`
`Exhibit 1
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 2 of 70 PageID #: 18465
`
`Jung, Soyoung
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Citroen, Phillip W.
`Friday, February 14, 2020 11:47 AM
`Nosson Knobloch; Jung, Soyoung; apoff@ycst.com; ServicePH Samsung-ELM 3DS;
`Soobert, Allan M.
`Mailing List - Leedy; Michael J. Farnan; Brian Farnan
`RE: Draft Letter to Judge Hall
`
`Nosson, 

`The correct number is SAMSUNG‐ELM‐000062368. 

`Regards, 
`Phillip 

`From: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>  
`Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 12:56 PM 
`To: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com>; apoff@ycst.com; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS 
`<ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; Soobert, Allan M. <allansoobert@paulhastings.com>; Citroen, Phillip 
`W. <phillipcitroen@paulhastings.com> 
`Cc: Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; Michael J. Farnan <mfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Brian Farnan 
`<bfarnan@farnanlaw.com> 
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Draft Letter to Judge Hall 

`Soyoung,
`
`Item 3, below, identifies SAMSUNG-ELM-0000628 as containing transfer prices. After
`looking at that bates number, I believe this was a typo. Can you please let me know what bates
`number you intended to identify?
`
`Thanks,
`
`-Nosson
`
`BartlitBeck LLP

`Nosson D. Knobloch | p: 303.592.3122 | c: 773.301.2851 | Nosson.Knobloch@BartlitBeck.com | 1801 Wewatta Street, 12th Floor, Denver, CO
`80202
`This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then immediately delete this
`message. 
`
`From: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com>  
`Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 12:35 PM 
`To: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>; apoff@ycst.com; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS 
`<ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; Soobert, Allan M. <allansoobert@paulhastings.com>; Citroen, Phillip 
`W. <phillipcitroen@paulhastings.com> 
`Cc: Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; Michael J. Farnan <mfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Brian Farnan 
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 3 of 70 PageID #: 18466
`<bfarnan@farnanlaw.com> 
`Subject: RE: Draft Letter to Judge Hall 

`Nosson,  

`You have now received Samsung's productions of: 

`
`1. worldwide sales for the memory products (SAMSUNG‐ELM‐000062369);    
`2. worldwide sales for the image sensor products (SAMSUNG‐ELM‐000062370); 
`3. transfer prices (SAMSUNG‐ELM‐0000628); 
`4. sales data for downstream products containing third‐party components (SAMSUNG‐ELM‐000062371);  
`5. correlations of downstream products to third‐party memory/image sensor components (SAMSUNG‐ELM‐
`000062372); and 
`6. correlations of downstream products to Samsung memory/image sensor products (SAMSUNG‐ELM‐000062373). 
`

`Samsung is currently finalizing the data it has compiled on SAS wafer sales, and we expect to produce this last remaining 
`item to you by Friday or early next week.    

`These productions moot any need for Elm’s motion.  Therefore, please confirm that Elm will withdraw its motion so that 
`the parties can avoid burdening the Court with an entirely unnecessary dispute.    

`Regards, 
`Soyoung  

`From: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>  
`Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 2:02 PM 
`To: apoff@ycst.com; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS <ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; Jung, Soyoung 
`<soyoungjung@paulhastings.com>; Soobert, Allan M. <allansoobert@paulhastings.com>; Citroen, Phillip W. 
`<phillipcitroen@paulhastings.com> 
`Cc: Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; Michael J. Farnan <mfarnan@farnanlaw.com>; Brian Farnan 
`<bfarnan@farnanlaw.com> 
`Subject: [EXT] Draft Letter to Judge Hall 

`Counsel:
`
`Per Judge Hall’s Order, D.I. 247, we’ve attached a draft letter setting-forth the dates that we are
`available for a discovery teleconference. Please let us know if you have any edits to the
`letter. And, if any of these dates do not work for you, please let us know what other dates
`you’re available.
`
`Thanks,
`
`-Nosson
`
`BartlitBeck LLP

`Nosson D. Knobloch | p: 303.592.3122 | c: 773.301.2851 | Nosson.Knobloch@BartlitBeck.com | 1801 Wewatta Street, 12th Floor, Denver, CO
`80202
`This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then immediately delete this
`message. 

`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 4 of 70 PageID #: 18467
`
`Exhibit 2
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 5 of 70 PageID #: 18468
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`
`
` ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`
`1(213) 683-6211
`soyoungjung@paulhastings.com
`
`December 12, 2019
`
`VIA E-MAIL
`
`Nosson Knobloch
`Bartlit Beck LLP
`1801 Wewatta, Suite 1200
`Denver, CO 80202
`
`Re:
`
`Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC v. Samsung Elecs. Co. Ltd., et al., CA. No. 14-cv-1430-
`LPS-CJB
`
`Dear Nosson:
`
`This letter responds to your correspondence of December 10, and our teleconferences on
`December 9 and 10. Samsung’s proposal for the discovery we discussed is set forth below.
`
`I.
`
`Downstream Products
`
`Samsung agrees to produce U.S. sales data for all downstream products that include: (1)
`relevant memory components, and (2) relevant image sensor components. Samsung anticipates
`producing the corresponding sales data for these products from both SEA and SELA-Miami, by
`January 10. Samsung is endeavoring to produce this data earlier, but given the anticipated
`business shutdowns from the upcoming holidays, and the large volume of products at issue,
`Samsung estimates January 10 as a more feasible date of production.
`
`II. Worldwide Sales Data
`
`
`A.
`
`U.S. Sales Activities
`
`Samsung agrees to produce worldwide sales data for the relevant products (e.g., stacked
`products including at least one die that is 50 microns or less) arising from sales-related activities
`conducted by any Samsung defendant in the U.S. To the extent not already produced, Samsung
`proposes producing this data to Elm by January 24.
`
`B.
`
`Image Sensor Products Incorporating SAS Wafers
`
`Samsung agrees to produce worldwide sales data for the relevant image sensor products
`incorporating wafers manufactured at SAS. Samsung proposes producing this data to Elm by
`January 10.
`
`
`LEGAL_US_W # 101313676.1
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 6 of 70 PageID #: 18469
`
`
`December 12, 2019
`Page 2
`
`However, to be clear, Samsung interprets this discovery as relating to Elm’s request for
`worldwide sales of relevant products in general. Samsung’s agreement to produce this data is
`based on its relationship to U.S.-based activities, as we discussed (and noted in Section II.A.
`above). In producing this data, Samsung does not admit that it is properly within the scope of
`this litigation or otherwise can be the subject of a valid damages theory.
`
`We note again that you raised for the first time on our teleconferences of December 9 and
`10 that Elm seeks worldwide sales for stacked memory and image sensor products that
`specifically incorporate wafers made by SAS, and you reiterated that request in your email of
`December 10. To the extent that you believe that these new requests are relevant to Elm’s
`Interrogatory No. 5 to Samsung (which appears to be your position), Samsung disagrees. That
`interrogatory reads as follows:
`
`Identify on a product-by-product basis the monthly revenue and profit for any
`component that you manufacture in or supply from the United States that is
`incorporated into a Product that contains a semiconductor layer that is 50
`microns or less.
`
`The interrogatory plainly seeks sales data for unfinished components that are manufactured in or
`supplied from the U.S., and further incorporated into products containing a semiconductor layer
`that is 50 microns or less. The only components that potentially fall within the scope of this
`interrogatory are wafer products sold by SAS. Samsung’s downstream image sensor products,
`containing the SAS wafers, do not fall within the scope of this interrogatory because: (1) they are
`not “manufacture[d] in the United States”; (2) they are not “suppl[ied] from the United States”;
`and (3) they are not “incorporated into a Product that contains a semiconductor layer that is 50
`microns or less,” as they are products that themselves contain such layers. Finally, the
`interrogatory does not request “worldwide” sales anywhere. As you know, discovery requests
`must identify the information sought with reasonable particularity, and worldwide sales data is
`not identified in this interrogatory—and certainly not specified with the requisite particularity.
`
`Consistent with Elm’s briefing in the Micron case, you have explained to us in our
`discussions that the above interrogatory is based on Elm’s theory of liability under 35 U.S.C.
`271(f). However, that section of the statute is directed to liability from supplying from the U.S. a
`“component of a patented invention,” where “such component is uncombined in whole or in
`part.” The image sensor, memory and downstream consumer products are accused products
`under 35 U.S.C. 271(a), not unfinished components under 35 U.S.C. 271(f). Thus, we do not see
`how you can plausibly read your new requests for worldwide sales of finished downstream
`products containing SAS wafers as related to this interrogatory.
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 7 of 70 PageID #: 18470
`
`
`December 12, 2019
`Page 3
`
`C. Memory Products Incorporating SAS Wafers
`
`For similar reasons, we do not see how your new request this week for the worldwide
`sales of memory component products that specifically contain SAS wafers is relevant to Elm’s
`Interrogatory No. 5. Likewise, we interpret this request as relating instead to Elm’s request for
`worldwide sales of relevant products in general.
`
`As we previously informed you, Samsung cannot precisely identify which memory
`products contain SAS wafers before 2012, which is when SAS stopped making wafers for such
`products. Nevertheless, Samsung is currently investigating whether it is even possible to make
`inferences based on the production volume and average sales prices of memory products sold
`during that time period. Samsung expects to have answers to this investigation by early next
`week. However, we are not aware of any authority requiring a producing party to make an
`“estimation,” no less a “reliable” one as you have demanded, based on information not in its
`possession, custody or control. Please provide authority for your position.
`
`Should Samsung learn from its current investigation that it can estimate the memory
`products containing SAS wafers, and assuming you provide your authority promptly, Samsung
`would agree to produce the corresponding worldwide sales data by January 31.
`
`In addition, given that you have only recently articulated your request for worldwide
`sales for memory products containing SAS wafers, during our teleconferences of December 9
`and 10, and given that Elm’s Interrogatory No. 5 does not plausibly encompass such a request,
`we do not consider the issue ripe. Samsung needs additional time to investigate what responsive
`data it can potentially collect or otherwise “estimate” in connection with this request. Should
`Elm wish to move forward with a discovery dispute letter on Friday, Samsung will identify as a
`topic in the letter whether Elm’s identification of this particular dispute is premature given that
`Samsung has been denied adequate time to investigate this new request.
`
`III. New Additional Issues
`
`Samsung is in receipt of your request for updated U.S. sales data for relevant products
`that include components purchased from third parties. Samsung is also in receipt of your request
`for the prices that Samsung entities pay for the relevant components incorporated into final
`downstream products.
`
`As we noted in our teleconferences, these requests dramatically expand the scope of
`discovery and period for production, and the time needed to investigate these new issues is not
`based on any omissions by Samsung, as you have claimed. The parties could have been further
`along if Elm articulated its need for this additional information when Samsung first started
`compiling financial data or after reviewing Samsung’s productions in the past few months. You
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 8 of 70 PageID #: 18471
`
`
`December 12, 2019
`Page 4
`
`acknowledged that additional time is required for Samsung to respond to these issues at this time.
`Thus, we will respond in due course with Samsung’s response and proposal.
`
`
`
`Sincerely,
`
`/s/ Soyoung Jung
`
`Soyoung Jung
`of PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 9 of 70 PageID #: 18472
`
`Exhibit 3
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 10 of 70 PageID #: 18473
`
`Jung, Soyoung
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>
`Thursday, January 30, 2020 2:03 PM
`Jung, Soyoung
`Hsieh, Courtney A.; Kat Hacker; Adam Mortara; John Hughes; Matthew Ford;
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Mailing
`List - Leedy; ServicePH Samsung-ELM 3DS; apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com
`[EXT] RE: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case No. 1:14-
`cv-01430-LPS-CJB
`
`
`
`
`
`Soyoung,
`
`Following up on the below, please send me your edits so we can get the letter on file today. If
`you do not send us your edits today, we reserve the right to file the letter as-is. Samsung cannot
`unilaterally hold-up the process of getting these issues in front of the Court by ignoring our
`requests for input on the letter.
`
`Thanks,
`
`-Nosson
`
`BartlitBeck LLP

`Nosson D. Knobloch | p: 303.592.3122 | c: 773.301.2851 | Nosson.Knobloch@BartlitBeck.com | 1801 Wewatta Street, 12th Floor, Denver, CO
`80202
`This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then immediately delete this
`message. 
`
`From: Nosson Knobloch  
`Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 9:57 AM 
`To: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com> 
`Cc: Hsieh, Courtney A. <courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker <kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; Adam Mortara 
`<adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John Hughes <john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; Matthew Ford 
`<matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; 
`Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS <ServicePHSamsung‐
`ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: RE: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case No. 1:14‐cv‐01430‐LPS‐CJB 

`Soyoung,
`
`It turns out that I’m tied-up today. But I’m largely available tomorrow if you’d like to follow-
`up on any of the issues we’ve discussed.
`
`In the meantime, please send us your edits to the letter to the Court. For the reasons we
`discussed yesterday, we believe these issues need to be raised with Judge Stark now. To the
`extent that Samsung actually produces the information we need to move this case forward, we
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 11 of 70 PageID #: 18474
`will withdraw our motion. But Samsung’s failure to comply with the deal memorialized in my
`December 15 email leaves us no choice but to seek the Court’s assistance.
`
`Thanks,
`
`-Nosson
`
`BartlitBeck LLP

`Nosson D. Knobloch | p: 303.592.3122 | c: 773.301.2851 | Nosson.Knobloch@BartlitBeck.com | 1801 Wewatta Street, 12th Floor, Denver, CO
`80202
`This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then immediately delete this
`message. 
`
`From: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 8:29 PM 
`To: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com> 
`Cc: Hsieh, Courtney A. <courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker <kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; Adam Mortara 
`<adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John Hughes <john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; Matthew Ford 
`<matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; 
`Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS <ServicePHSamsung‐
`ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: RE: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case No. 1:14‐cv‐01430‐LPS‐CJB 

`We are generally free between 1‐5 PM ET tomorrow.  Can you provide your questions in advance so that we have time 
`to consider them before our call?   

`Thanks, 
`Soyoung 

`From: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 6:52 PM 
`To: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com> 
`Cc: Hsieh, Courtney A. <courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker <kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; Adam Mortara 
`<adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John Hughes <john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; Matthew Ford 
`<matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; 
`Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS <ServicePHSamsung‐
`ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: [EXT] Re: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case No. 1:14‐cv‐01430‐LPS‐CJB 

`Soyoung,  

`We have some questions about the parameters of your proposal. When are you available to discuss tomorrow?   

`Thanks, 

`Nosson  
`BartlitBeck LLP 

`Nosson D. Knobloch | p: 303.592.3122 | c: 773.301.2851 | Nosson.Knobloch@BartlitBeck.com |1801 Wewatta Street, 12th Floor, Denver, CO
`80202
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 12 of 70 PageID #: 18475
`This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then immediately delete this
`message. 
`
`
`On Jan 29, 2020, at 7:31 PM, Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com> wrote: 
`
`

`Nosson, 
`
`  
`We had our call with Samsung tonight.  Samsung is willing to produce all worldwide sales data for the 
`accused products by next Wednesday on the condition that Elm (i) postpones filing any discovery letter 
`with the Court and (ii) agrees to give Samsung the reasonable time it needs to finish collecting the 
`additional data Elm has requested.  Samsung can commit to producing the requested data on transfer 
`prices and memory products containing SAS wafers by Monday, and the correlation data and any sales 
`data for downstream products containing third party components by Feb. 14.   
`  
`In the meantime, we look forward to reviewing your written responses to our letters of December.  If 
`Elm is willing to work with us on outstanding discovery items, we are willing to extend the same 
`courtesy, and avoid burdening the Court with our disputes at this time.   
`
`  
`Please let us know if this compromise is acceptable to Elm.  If it is not, we will provide our edits to the 
`discovery letter in the morning. 
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`Soyoung  
`
`  
`From: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 1:41 PM 
`To: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com> 
`Cc: Hsieh, Courtney A. <courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker <kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`Adam Mortara <adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John Hughes <john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`Matthew Ford <matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; 
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS 
`<ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case No. 1:14‐cv‐01430‐
`LPS‐CJB 

`
` I
`
`
`
`
`
` will open the line at 3pmMT. 
`

`BartlitBeck LLP 

`Nosson D. Knobloch | p: 303.592.3122 | c: 773.301.2851 | Nosson.Knobloch@BartlitBeck.com | 1801 Wewatta Street, 12th
`Floor, Denver, CO 80202
`This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then
`immediately delete this message. 
`

`From: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 2:31 PM 
`To: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com> 
`Cc: Hsieh, Courtney A. <courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker <kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`Adam Mortara <adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John Hughes <john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`Matthew Ford <matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; 
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS 
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 13 of 70 PageID #: 18476
`<ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: RE: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case No. 1:14‐cv‐01430‐LPS‐
`CJB 
`
`  
`Nosson, 
`
`  
`Your draft letter to the Court is premature and does not add Defendants’ discovery issues.  We can wait 
`until we receive your written response on these issues, or go ahead and discuss today provided that you 
`appreciate that we do not have updates from Samsung to report. 
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`Soyoung 
`
`  
`From: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:15 AM 
`To: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com> 
`Cc: Hsieh, Courtney A. <courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker <kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`Adam Mortara <adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John Hughes <john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`Matthew Ford <matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; 
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS 
`<ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case No. 1:14‐cv‐01430‐
`LPS‐CJB 
`
`  
`Soyoung, 
`

`We cannot delay this until Friday. Samsung’s delays in complying with its
`discovery obligations are a key issue that we intend to raise with the Court and,
`especially in light of the accelerated discovery deadlines you have insisted upon,
`this needs to be resolved right away.  
`

`There is one alternative that we’d like to propose: In light of your representation
`that a meet and confer today would be unhelpful, we would be fine filing the
`attached letter today, and then following up with you on Friday. If our Friday
`discussion renders any portion of our request moot, we can always withdraw all or
`part of the request.  
`

`We are working on drafting a written response to your December letters, and
`expect to have that ready for you today or tomorrow. We propose you review that
`letter and then let us know if you’d like to meet and confer from there. That said,
`if you’d prefer to just talk through the issues today (or Friday), that’s fine with us.  
`

`Please let me know how you’d like to proceed. 
`

`Finally, you promised last week to provide certain correlation data by “early to
`mid” week this week. Are you on track to getting that to us today? 
`  
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 14 of 70 PageID #: 18477
`Thanks, 
`  
`-Nosson  
`

`BartlitBeck LLP 

`Nosson D. Knobloch | p: 303.592.3122 | c: 773.301.2851 | Nosson.Knobloch@BartlitBeck.com | 1801 Wewatta Street, 12th
`Floor, Denver, CO 80202
`This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then
`immediately delete this message. 
`

`From: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:57 AM 
`To: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com> 
`Cc: Hsieh, Courtney A. <courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker <kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`Adam Mortara <adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John Hughes <john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`Matthew Ford <matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; 
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS 
`<ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: RE: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case No. 1:14‐cv‐01430‐LPS‐
`CJB 
`
`  
`Nosson, 
`
`  
`As noted in my previous email, we do not believe a call would be productive until we have had an 
`opportunity to talk to Samsung.  So, we would still prefer to meet after our call with Samsung tonight. 
`We are happy to talk on Friday if that is better for you.  
`  
`If you would like to proceed with a call today regardless, we can go forward.  But, please be prepared to 
`address all of the deficiency letters we sent you in December.  Elm has ignored our letters, and we plan 
`to include these disputes in any letter to the Court absent resolution during our call. 
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`Soyoung 
`
`  
`From: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 8:42 AM 
`To: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com> 
`Cc: Hsieh, Courtney A. <courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker <kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`Adam Mortara <adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John Hughes <john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`Matthew Ford <matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; 
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com>; ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS 
`<ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: [EXT] Re: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case No. 1:14‐cv‐01430‐
`LPS‐CJB 
`
`  
`Soyoung,  
`
`  
`You told me you were available today and we blocked off that time to talk. I am largely tied‐up 
`tomorrow, so let’s talk today and see where things stand.  In the meantime, please send me any edits to 
`the draft letter I sent you yesterday, so that we can finalize the letter in the event we need to initiate 
`the process of scheduling a discovery conference with the Court.  
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 15 of 70 PageID #: 18478
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`
`  
`Nosson  
`BartlitBeck LLP 

`Nosson D. Knobloch | p: 303.592.3122 | c: 773.301.2851 | Nosson.Knobloch@BartlitBeck.com |1801 Wewatta Street,
`12th Floor, Denver, CO 80202
`This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then
`immediately delete this message. 
`  
`
`
`
`
`
`On Jan 29, 2020, at 9:24 AM, Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com> wrote: 
`
`  
`
`Nosson, 
`
`  
`Due to the Lunar New Year, we have not yet had an opportunity to consult with 
`Samsung regarding this issue.  We are, however, scheduled to speak with Samsung 
`tonight, and would like to move our meet and confer to tomorrow, so that we can get 
`an update from Samsung on the current status of its investigation.  
`
`  
`We are happy to talk today as well, if there is something you would like to address.  But 
`we need Samsung’s input before we can fully meet and confer.  
`
`  
`Please let us know your availability for a call tomorrow (Thursday). 
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`Soyoung 
`
`  
`From: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>  
`Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 5:18 PM 
`To: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com>; Hsieh, Courtney A. 
`<courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker <kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; Adam 
`Mortara <adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John Hughes 
`<john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; Matthew Ford <matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Mailing 
`List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com> 
`Cc: ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS <ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; 
`apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case 
`No. 1:14‐cv‐01430‐LPS‐CJB 
`
`  
`Soyoung, 
`  
`It is clear from your response that Samsung has not kept up its end of
`the deal. Accordingly, we intend to file a motion to compel this
`week. I’ll send you a draft letter to the Court tomorrow, so that we
`can finalize it during our call on Wednesday. We are available on
`Wednesday at 3pmMT. Please circulate a dial-in for that time. 
`  
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 16 of 70 PageID #: 18479
`Thanks, 
`  
`-Nosson  
`

`BartlitBeck LLP 

`Nosson D. Knobloch | p: 303.592.3122 | c: 773.301.2851 | Nosson.Knobloch@BartlitBeck.com | 1801
`Wewatta Street, 12th Floor, Denver, CO 80202
`This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of
`the error and then immediately delete this message. 
`

`From: Jung, Soyoung <soyoungjung@paulhastings.com>  
`Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 5:01 PM 
`To: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>; Hsieh, Courtney A. 
`<courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker <kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; Adam 
`Mortara <adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John Hughes 
`<john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; Matthew Ford <matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; 
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Mailing 
`List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com> 
`Cc: ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS <ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; 
`apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: RE: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case No. 
`1:14‐cv‐01430‐LPS‐CJB 
`
`  
`Nosson, 
`
`  
`Samsung has attempted, in good faith, to provide the requested discovery pursuant to 
`the parties’ agreement, which was that Samsung would investigate and produce 
`worldwide sales data for the relevant products (e.g., stacked products including at least 
`one die that is 50 microns or less) arising from sales‐related activities conducted by any 
`Samsung defendant in the U.S.  The spreadsheet that was served on Friday, January 24, 
`includes responsive non‐U.S. sales data for Samsung’s U.S.‐based customers.  Samsung 
`is continuing its investigation of additional customers for which there may have been 
`sales‐related activities in the U.S., but as of now, has yet to identify any. 
`
`  
`We are generally available after 3 PM ET this Wednesday to discuss.   Let us know what 
`time works for you.  
`
`  
`Thanks, 
`Soyoung  
`
`  
`From: Nosson Knobloch <nosson.knobloch@bartlitbeck.com>  
`Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 3:30 PM 
`To: Hsieh, Courtney A. <courtneyhsieh@paulhastings.com>; Kat Hacker 
`<kat.hacker@bartlitbeck.com>; Adam Mortara <adam.mortara@bartlitbeck.com>; John 
`Hughes <john.hughes@bartlitbeck.com>; Matthew Ford 
`<matthew.ford@bartlitbeck.com>; bfarnan@farnanlaw.com; farnan@farnanlaw.com; 
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com; Mailing List ‐ Leedy <leedy@bartlit‐beck.com> 
`Cc: ServicePH Samsung‐ELM 3DS <ServicePHSamsung‐ELM3DS@paulhastings.com>; 
`apoff@ycst.com; pkraman@ycst.com 
`Subject: [EXT] RE: Elm 3DS Innovations LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, Case 
`No. 1:14‐cv‐01430‐LPS‐CJB 
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 257-1 Filed 02/25/20 Page 17 of 70 PageID #: 18480
`
`  
`Soyoung, 
`

`Your letter that accompanied today’s production says that your
`production includes sales to “Samsung’s U.S.-based customers.” I’ve
`pasted below the relevant language from our agreement, which
`includes more than just sales to Samsung’s US-based customers.  
`  
`It appears that Samsung has, once again, failed to comply with its
`commitments under our agreement. Please let me know what time on
`Monday you and your local counsel are available to meet and confer
`so that we can determine the appropriate next steps. 
`

`Thanks, 
`  
`-Nosson  
`  
`  
`  
`
`1. By January 24, Samsung will produce worldwide sales data for
`all relevant products (including all stacked semiconductor
`products that include at least one die that is 50 microns or less)
`regarding which Samsung has conducted sales-related activities
`in the U.S. Samsung has represented that it is currently
`investigating the various types of activities that it conducts in
`the U.S., and has agreed to raise any questions about the
`specific activities that Elm believ

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket