`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC, a
`Delaware limited liability company,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
`Korean business entity,
`SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., a
`California corporation,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC., a New York corporation,
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited
`liability company, and
`SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR,
`LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 14-1430-LPS-CJB
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on November 21, 2014, Plaintiff Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC (“Plaintiff” or
`
`“Elm”) filed its Complaint for Patent Infringement in the United States District Court for the
`
`District of Delaware.
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff named as Defendants in the Complaint for Patent Infringement, the
`
`following entities:
`
`(1)
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a Korean business entity;
`
`(2)
`
`Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., a California corporation;
`
`(3)
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc., a New York corporation;
`
`(4)
`
`Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
`
`company; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-CJB Document 10 Filed 01/14/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 359
`
`(5)
`
`Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, on December 24, 2014, Plaintiff served its Complaint for Patent
`
`Infringement on Defendants Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications
`
`America, LLC; and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC.
`
`WHEREAS, on December 29, 2014, Plaintiff served its Complaint for Patent
`
`Infringement on Defendant Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants wish to enter a joint stipulation regarding service
`
`of the Plaintiff’s Complaint for Patent Infringement.
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants wish to enter a joint stipulation regarding
`
`the time for responding to Plaintiff’s Complaint for Patent Infringement.Now, therefore, IT IS
`
`HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that
`
`1.
`
`The Defendants, including Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., accept service of
`
`Plaintiff’s Complaint for Patent Infringement; and
`
`2.
`
`The deadline for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
`
`Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications
`
`America, LLC, and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC to answer, move or otherwise
`
`respond to the Plaintiff’s Complaint for Patent Infringement is extended through and
`
`including Friday, March 13, 2015.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 14, 2015
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-CJB Document 10 Filed 01/14/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 360
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`
` /s/ Michael J. Farnan
`Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. (No. 100245)
`Brian E. Farnan (No. 4089)
`Michael J. Farnan (No. 5165)
`919 North Market Street, 12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 777-0300
`(302) 777-0301 (fax)
`farnan@farnanlaw.com
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED this ____ day of _______, 2015.
`
`YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT &
`TAYLOR, LLP
`
`
`/s/ Adam. W. Poff
`Adam W. Poff (No. 3990)
`Monté T. Squire (No. 4764)
`Gregory J. Brodzik (No. 5722)
`Rodney Square
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 571-6600
`apoff@ycst.com
`msquire@ycst.com
`gbrodzik@ycst.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
