throbber
Case 1:14-cv-01278-GMS Document 37 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1173
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES
`LTD., TEVA NEUROSCIENCE, INC., and
`YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
`CO., LTD.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`SANDOZ INC. and MOMENTA
`PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`Defendants.
`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~)
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
`)
`)
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES
`)
`LTD., TEVA NEUROSCIENCE, INC., and
`)
`YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
`)
`CO., LTD.,
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`Defendants.
`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~)
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`MYLAN INC. and NATCO PHARMA LTD.,
`
`C.A. No. 14-1171-GMS
`(CONSOLIDATED)
`
`C.A. No. 14-1278-GMS
`
`ORDER
`
`WHEREAS, on October 6, 2014, the plaintiffs (collectively, "Teva") filed this action
`
`against defendants Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan Inc. (collectively, "Mylan"), and Natco
`
`Pharma Ltd. ("Natco") (D.I. 1); 1
`
`WHEREAS, presently before the court is Natco's motion to dismiss the complaint. (D.I.
`
`22.) Natco argues (1) that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over Natco; (2) that Teva fails to
`
`1 Citations to docket items refer to the originally filed member case: C.A. No. 14-1278-GMS.
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01278-GMS Document 37 Filed 03/12/15 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1174
`
`state a claim with respect to Counts I and III; and (3) that the court lacks subject matter
`
`jurisdiction to adjudicate Counts II and IV (D.1. 23);
`
`WHEREAS, in response, Teva argues that personal jurisdiction exists over Natco-an
`
`Indian company-pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2). Rule 4(k)(2) states:
`
`Federal Claim Outside State-Court Jurisdiction. For a claim that
`arises under federal law, serving a summons or filing a waiver of
`service establishes personal jurisdiction over a defendant if:
`(A) the defendant is not subject to jurisdiction in any state's
`courts of general jurisdiction; and
`(B) exercising jurisdiction is consistent with the United
`States Constitution and laws.
`
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k)(2). In its reply, Natco repeatedly concedes that it would be subject to suit in
`
`the Northern District of West Virginia. (D.I. 35 at 2-3 ("[T]his patent infringement suit could be
`
`brought-indeed has been brought-by Teva against Natco[] in the ... Northern District of
`
`West Virginia.").) The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has explained:
`
`[T]he purposes of Rule 4(k)(2) are best achieved when the
`defendant is afforded the opportunity to avoid the application of
`the rule only when it designates a suitable forum in which the
`plaintiff could have brought suit. [The concern underlying Rule
`4(k)(2) was] with defendants escaping jurisdiction in U.S. federal
`courts while still having minimum contacts with the United States.
`
`Touchcom, Inc. v. Bereskin & Parr, 574 F.3d 1403, 1415 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (emphasis added).
`
`Therefore, "[a] defendant who wants to preclude the use of Rule 4(k)(2) has only to name some
`
`other state in which the suit could proceed." Id. at 1414 (quoting ISi Int'!, Inc. v. Borden Ladner
`
`Gervais LLP, 256 F.3d 548, 552 (7th Cir. 2001)).
`
`WHEREAS, Natco has identified an alternative federal forum in which it would be
`
`subject to suit. Rule 4(k)(2) does not permit the court to exercise personal jurisdiction over
`
`Natco. Teva's alternative theory-arguing that the court may exercise specific jurisdiction by
`
`virtue ofNatco's relationship to Mylan-is not supported by law. (D.I. 31at10.) Moreover, the
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01278-GMS Document 37 Filed 03/12/15 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1175
`
`court is not convinced that jurisdictional discovery would yield information capable of affecting
`
`the jurisdictional outcome;
`
`THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Natco's Motion to Dismiss the
`
`Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (D.I. 22) is GRANTED. The court declines to
`
`address the additional arguments raised in Natco's motion.
`
`Dated: March (>-, 2015
`
`3
`
`I
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket