`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-JLH
`
`))))))))))
`
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.’s RENEWED MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
`AND MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L. renews its
`
`motions for judgment as a matter of law of i) no anticipation as to Claims 23 and 30 of U.S. Patent
`
`7,917,843; ii) non-obviousness as to Claims 23 and 30 of U.S. Patent 7,917,843; and iii) estoppel
`
`of the following grounds, under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e): CyberDesk (as to anticipation), CyberDesk
`
`and Word (as an obviousness combination).
`
`Arendi S.A.R.L. moves, in the alterative, for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 59(a)(1).
`
`The grounds for this Motion are set forth in the opening brief in support of this motion,
`
`filed contemporaneously herewith.
`
`
`Dated: June 2, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 559 Filed 06/02/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 56835
`
`
`
`SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS LLP
`
`/s/ Neal C. Belgam
`Neal C. Belgam (No. 2721)
`Daniel Taylor (No. 6934)
`1000 West Street, Suite 1501
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 652-8400
`nbelgam@skjlaw.com
`dtaylor@skjlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.
`
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`Seth Ard (pro hac vice)
`Max Straus (pro hac vice)
`Beatrice Franklin (pro hac vice)
`SUSMAN GODFREY, L.L.P.
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
`New York, New York 10019
`Tel: (212) 336-8330
`sard@susmangodfrey.com
`mstraus@susmangodfrey.com
`bfranklin@susmangodfrey.com
`
`John Lahad (pro hac vice)
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, TX 77002-5096
`jlahad@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kalpana Srinivasan (pro hac vice)
`1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kemper Diehl (pro hac vice)
`401 Union Street, Suite 3000
`Seattle, WA 98101-3000
`kdiehl@susmangodfrey.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
