`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 531 Filed 05/02/23 Page 1 of 5 PagelD #: 52911
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 531 Filed 05/02/23 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 52911
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-JLH
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`) )
`
`ARENDIS.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLELLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`VERDICTFORM
`
`Instructions: When answering the following questions and completing this Verdict
`
`Form,please follow the directions provided and follow the Jury Instructions that you have been
`
`given. Your answer to each question must be unanimous. Some ofthe questions contain legal
`
`terms that are defined and explained in the Jury Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions if
`
`you are unsure about the meaning or usage of any legal term that appears in the questions below.
`
`Asused herein:
`
`1. “Arendi” refers to Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.;
`
`2. “Google” refers to Defendant Google LLC;
`
`3. The “843 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 7,917,843.
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 531 Filed 05/02/23 Page 2 of 5 PagelD #: 52912
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 531 Filed 05/02/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 52912
`
`QUESTION1:
`
`Did Arendi prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Google directly infringed any of the
`
`following claims of the ’843 Patent?
`
`“Yes” is a finding for Arendi.
`
`“No”is a finding for Google.
`
`
`
`QUESTION2:
`
`Did Google prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following claimsof the ’843
`
`Patent are invalid as anticipated by priorart?
`
`“Yes”is a finding in favor of Google.
`
`“No”is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 531 Filed 05/02/23 Page 3 of 5 PagelD #: 52913
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 531 Filed 05/02/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 52913
`
`QUESTION3:
`
`Did Google prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following claims of the °843
`
`Patent are invalid as obvious in view ofprior art?
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Google.
`
`“No”is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`
`ee
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 531 Filed 05/02/23 Page 4 of 5 PagelD #: 52914
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 531 Filed 05/02/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 52914
`
`Instructions: Only answer Questions 4 and 5 if you:
`
`e Answered “Yes” for any of the claims in Question 1;
`
`AND
`
`e Answered “No”for any of those same claims in Question 2 and Question 3.
`
`Otherwise, skip and DO NOT answer Questions 4 and 5 and instead please proceed directly to
`
`the final page of this Verdict Form and sign and date that page.
`
`QUESTION4:
`
`What amount of damages has Arendi proven, by a preponderanceofthe evidence, thatit is entitled
`
`to as a reasonable royalty for Google’s infringement of the ’843 Patent?
`
`Answer: $
`
`QUESTION5:
`
`Did Arendi prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Google’s infringement of any of the
`
`claims of the ’843 Patent was willful?
`
`“Yes” is a finding for Arendi.
`
`“No”is a finding for Google.
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 531 Filed 05/02/23 Page 5 of 5 PagelD #: 52915
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 531 Filed 05/02/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 52915
`
`You have nowreachedthe end of the verdict form and you should review it to ensure that
`
`it entirely reflects your unanimous determinations. The Foreperson should then sign the verdict
`
`form in the space below andnotify the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The
`
`Foreperson should retain possession ofthe verdict form andbringit to the courtroom with thejury.
`
`nl
`
`Dated: May 24 go973
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
