throbber
Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 474 Filed 04/20/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 49961
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-JLH
`
`))))))))))
`
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LETTER TO THE HONORABLE JENNIFER L. HALL FROM NEAL BELGAM
`REGARDING PRELIMINARY JURY INSTRUCTIONS
`
`SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS LLP
`Neal C. Belgam (No. 2721)
`Daniel Taylor (No. 6934)
`1000 West Street, Suite 1501
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 652-8400
`nbelgam@skjlaw.com
`dtaylor@skjlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.
`
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`Seth Ard (pro hac vice)
`Max Straus (pro hac vice)
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`sard@susmangodfrey.com
`mstraus@susmangodfrey.com
`
`John Lahad (pro hac vice)
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, TX 77002-5096
`jlahad@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kalpana Srinivasan (pro hac vice)
`1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kemper Diehl (pro hac vice)
`401 Union Street, Suite 3000
`Seattle, WA 98101-3000
`kdiehl@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Dated: April 20, 2023
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 474 Filed 04/20/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 49962
`
`Dear Judge Hall:
`
`We write on behalf of Arendi S.A.R.L. and Google LLC pursuant to the Court’s Order
`(D.I. 471) that the parties shall file a joint letter setting forth any corrections or objections to the
`Court’s Proposed Preliminary Jury Instructions.
`
`Arendi will not be asserting at trial the method claims (claims 1 and 8) of U.S. Patent No.
`7,917,843. Accordingly, the listing of asserted claims in Section II (“Overview of the Case”)
`should be modified to state: “Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant infringes Claims 23 and 30 of the
`’843 Patent.”
`
`Arendi maintains that there are no other changes or objections to the Court’s Proposed
`Preliminary Jury Instructions.
`
`Google maintains that the following two underlined sentences from “Section VII. Burdens
`of Proof” (p. 7) should also be removed. The first underlined sentence is redundant, and the second
`should drop out with the removal of the method claims. Arendi opposes the removal.
`
`
`“Plaintiff Arendi asserts that Defendant Google infringes the ’843 Patent. Plaintiff Arendi
`alleges that Defendant Google infringes the ’843 Patent directly. Plaintiff Arendi also alleges that
`Defendant Google induced others to infringe the ’843 Patent and contributed to others’
`infringement of the ’843 Patent. Plaintiff Arendi alleges that the Defendant’s infringement of
`the’843 Patent was willful. Plaintiff Arendi bears the burden of proof on each of these issues by a
`preponderance of the evidence.”
`
`Arendi would not oppose Google’s proposed deletion of the two sentences provided that
`such removal is without prejudice to the infringement claims themselves and does not constitute a
`waiver of any claims.
`
`
`The parties are available at the Court’s convenience to address any questions or concerns.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`/s/ Neal C. Belgam
`
`Neal C. Belgam (No. 2721)
`
`cc:
`
`Clerk of Court (via CM/ECF)
`All Counsel of Record (via CM/ECF)
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket