Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 48506
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-JLH
`
`))))))))))
`
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`PRELIMINARY JURY INSTRUCTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 2 of 21 PageID #: 48507
`
`Page
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`6
`7
`8
`11
`12
`13
`15
`16
`18
`19
`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`INTRODUCTION
`OVERVIEW OF THE CASE
`UNITED STATES PATENTS
`EVIDENCE
`CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES; WEIGHING CONFLICTING TESTIMONY
`EXPERT TESTIMONY
`
`I.
`II.
`III.
`IV.
`V.
`VI.
`VII. BURDENS OF PROOF
`VIII. DEPOSITION TESTIMONY
`IX.
`X.
`XI.
`XII. CONDUCT OF THE JURY
`XIII. COURSE OF THE TRIAL
`XIV. TRIAL SCHEDULE
`
`DEMONSTRATIVES
`NOTE-TAKING
`SIDEBARS
`
`
`
`-i-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 3 of 21 PageID #: 48508
`
`I.
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Members of the jury: Now that you have been sworn, I have the following preliminary
`
`instructions for your guidance as jurors in this case.
`
`These instructions are intended to introduce you to the case and the law that you will apply
`
`to the evidence that you will hear. I will give you more detailed instructions on the law at the end
`
`of the trial. Also, because this case involves patents, I will additionally give you some preliminary
`
`instructions regarding patents to assist you in discharging your duties as jurors.
`
`You will hear the evidence, decide what the facts are, and then apply those facts to the law
`
`that I will give to you. You and only you will be the judges of the facts. I play no part in judging
`
`the facts. My role is to be the judge of the law. I make whatever legal decisions have to be made
`
`during the course of the trial, and I will explain to you the legal principles that must guide you in
`
`your decisions. You must follow that law whether you agree with it or not. Perform these duties
`
`fairly. Do not let any bias, sympathy, or prejudice that you may feel toward one side or the other
`
`influence your decision in any way. Nothing I say or do is intended to indicate, or should be taken
`
`by you as indicating, what your verdict should be.
`
`At the end of the evidence, I will give you instructions on the law to apply in deciding this
`
`case, and I’ll give you a list of questions that you are then to answer.
`
`This list of questions is called the verdict form. Your answers to these questions will need
`
`to be unanimous, and your answers will constitute the verdict in this case.
`
`-1-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 4 of 21 PageID #: 48509
`
`II.
`
`
`
`OVERVIEW OF THE CASE
`
`During the jury-selection process, I advised you that this is a civil action arising under the
`
`patent laws of the United States. The parties in this case are the plaintiff, Arendi S.A.R.L., and the
`
`defendant, Google LLC. We will often refer to those parties as Arendi and Google for short. The
`
`case involves United States Patent No. 7,917,843. We will often refer to this patent as the ’843
`
`Patent for short. We may also refer to it as “the Asserted Patent” or the “Patent-in-suit.”
`
`Plaintiff Arendi is the owner of the ’843 Patent. Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant
`
`infringes Claims 1, 8, 23 and 30 of the ’843 Patent. These claims may be referred to as the
`
`“Asserted Claims.” Generally, the products that Plaintiff accuses of infringement are, first, certain
`
`Google smartphone apps and, second, certain Google smartphones on which those apps are
`
`installed. Defendant denies that it has infringed the Asserted Claims and also argues that the
`
`Asserted Claims are invalid.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 5 of 21 PageID #: 48510
`
`
`
`III. UNITED STATES PATENTS
`
`As I just mentioned, this case is about patents. To help you understand what patents are, the
`
`role of the Patent Office, and why disputes over patents arise you will now be shown a video. This
`
`video was prepared by the Federal Judicial Center, not the parties in this case, to help introduce you
`
`to the patent system. During the video, reference will be made to a sample patent. A copy of the
`
`sample patent is contained in your juror notebooks for you to follow along. The video will run for
`
`approximately 17 minutes. At the conclusion of the video, I will provide you with additional
`
`instructions.
`
`
`
`[The video will be played.]
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 6 of 21 PageID #: 48511
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IV.
`
`EVIDENCE
`
`The evidence from which you are to find the facts consists of the following:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`
`
`The testimony of the witnesses;
`
`Documents and other things received in evidence as exhibits;
`
`Any facts that are stipulated--that is, formally agreed to by the parties; and
`
`Facts that the Court takes judicial notice of and that I instruct you to take as true.
`
`The following things are not evidence:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Statements, arguments, and questions of the lawyers for the parties in this case;
`
`Objections by the lawyers;
`
`Any testimony I tell you to disregard; and
`
`Anything you may see or hear about this case outside the courtroom.
`
`You must make your decision based only on the evidence that you see and hear in court.
`
`Do not let rumors, suspicions, or anything else that you may see or hear outside of Court influence
`
`your decision in any way.
`
`You should use your common sense in weighing the evidence. Consider it in light of your
`
`everyday experience with people and events, and give it whatever weight you believe it deserves.
`
`If your experience tells you that certain evidence reasonably leads to a conclusion, you are free to
`
`reach that conclusion.
`
`There are rules that control what can be received into evidence. When a lawyer asks a
`
`question or offers an exhibit into evidence, and a lawyer on the other side thinks that it is not
`
`permitted by the rules of evidence, that lawyer may object. This simply means that the lawyer is
`
`requesting that I make a decision on a particular rule of evidence. You should not be influenced
`
`by the fact that an objection is made. Objections to questions are not evidence. Lawyers have an
`
`obligation to their clients to make objections when they believe that evidence being offered is
`
`-4-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 7 of 21 PageID #: 48512
`
`improper under the rules of evidence. You should not be influenced by the objection or by the
`
`court’s ruling on it. If the objection is sustained, ignore the question. If it is overruled, treat the
`
`answer like any other. By allowing testimony or other evidence to be introduced over the objection
`
`of an attorney, the Court does not indicate any opinion as to the weight or effect of such evidence.
`
`If you are instructed that some item of evidence is received for a limited purpose only, you must
`
`follow that instruction.
`
`Also, certain testimony or other evidence may be ordered struck from the record and you
`
`will be instructed to disregard this evidence. Do not consider any testimony or other evidence that
`
`gets struck or excluded. Do not speculate about what a witness might have said or what an exhibit
`
`might have shown.
`
`There are two types of evidence: direct and circumstantial. Direct evidence is direct proof
`
`of a fact, such as testimony of an eyewitness. Circumstantial evidence is proof of a fact or facts
`
`from which you may infer or conclude that other facts do or do not exist. If someone walked into
`
`the courtroom wearing a raincoat covered with drops of water and carrying a wet umbrella, that
`
`would be circumstantial evidence from which you could conclude that it was raining. You should
`
`consider both kinds of evidence that are presented to you. The law makes no distinction in the
`
`weight to be given to either direct or circumstantial evidence. You are to decide how much weight
`
`to give any evidence.
`
`-5-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 8 of 21 PageID #: 48513
`
`V.
`
`
`
`CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES; WEIGHING CONFLICTING TESTIMONY
`
`You are the sole judges of each witness’s credibility. That is, it will be up to you to decide
`
`which witnesses to believe, which witnesses not to believe, and how much of any witness’s
`
`testimony to accept or reject. You should consider each witness’s means of knowledge; strength
`
`of memory; opportunity to observe; how reasonable or unreasonable the testimony is; whether it
`
`is consistent or inconsistent; whether it has been contradicted; the witness’s biases, prejudices or
`
`interests; the witness’s manner or demeanor on the witness stand; and all circumstances that,
`
`according to the evidence, could affect the credibility of the testimony.
`
`[Arendi: The weight of the evidence to prove a fact does not depend on the number of
`
`witnesses who testify. What is more important is how believable the witnesses were, and how
`
`much weight you think their testimony deserves. This instruction applies to the testimony of all
`
`witnesses, including expert witnesses.1]
`
`[Google opposes inclusion of Arendi’s proposal.2]
`
`
`1 Arendi: This language is adapted from the Third Circuit’s Model Jury Instructions at § 1.7
`(Preliminary Instructions – Credibility of Witnesses), ll. 19-21. Because this case concerns the
`operation and sale of Defendants’ products, they have employees to call as fact witnesses than does
`Arendi, such as engineers who developed software at issue. The jury should not confuse the number
`of Defendants’ employees with the strength of Defendants’ evidence.
`2 Google: Arendi’s proposed instruction mistakenly instructs the jury to disregard factors related to
`the number of witnesses, such as the fact that multiple witnesses concur on a particular fact, as not in
`any way relevant to the jurors’ responsibility to themselves weigh the evidence presented, and its
`forms. Arendi’s proposed instruction also unnecessarily deviates from the Third Circuit’s Model Jury
`Instructions that “[t]he weight of the evidence to prove a fact does not necessarily depend on the
`number of witnesses who testify.” The preceding paragraph accurately instructs the jury on this
`subject.
`
`-6-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 9 of 21 PageID #: 48514
`
`
`
`VI.
`
`EXPERT TESTIMONY
`
`Expert testimony is testimony from a person who has a special skill or knowledge in some
`
`science, profession, or business. This skill or knowledge is not common to the average person but
`
`has been acquired by the expert through special study or experience. In weighing expert testimony,
`
`you may consider the expert’s qualifications, the reasons for the expert’s opinions, and the
`
`reliability of the information supporting the expert’s opinions, as well as the factors I have
`
`previously mentioned for weighing testimony of any other witness. Expert testimony should
`
`receive whatever weight and credit you think appropriate, given all the other evidence in the case.
`
`You are free to accept or reject the testimony of experts, just as with any other witness.
`
`-7-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 10 of 21 PageID #: 48515
`
`
`
`VII. BURDENS OF PROOF
`
`In any legal action, facts must be proven by a required standard of evidence, known as the
`
`“burden of proof.” In a case involving patents, two different burdens of proof are used. The first is
`
`called “preponderance of the evidence.” The second is called “clear and convincing evidence.”
`
`Plaintiff Arendi asserts that Defendant Google infringes the ’843 Patent. Plaintiff Arendi
`
`alleges that Defendant Google infringes the ’843 Patent directly. [Arendi: Plaintiff Arendi also
`
`alleges that Defendant Google induced others to infringe the ’843 Patent and contributed to others’
`
`infringement of the ’843 Patent.]3 [Google opposes inclusion of Arendi’s proposal.4] Plaintiff
`
`Arendi alleges that the Defendant’s infringement of the’843 Patent was willful. Plaintiff Arendi
`
`bears the burden of proof on each of these issues by a preponderance of the evidence.
`
`[Arendi: That means, for Plaintiff Arendi to prevail on each of its claims, it must prove to
`
`you, in light of all the evidence, that what it claims is more likely true than not so. To say it
`
`differently: if you were to put the evidence favorable to Plaintiff Arendi and the evidence favorable
`
`to Google on opposite sides of a scale, Arendi would have to make the scales tip somewhat on
`
`Arendi’s side.5]
`
`[Google: When a party has the burden of proof on any claim or defense by a preponderance
`
`of the evidence, it means the evidence must persuade you that the claim or defense is more probable
`
`than not.6]
`
`
`3 Arendi: Stating burdens of proof absent context will not assist the jury and risks creating confusion.
`Arendi’s proposal provides a neutral statement of core issues and must sets for the accompanying
`burden of proof for each of them.
`4 Google: This instruction is contingent on Arendi asserting Claims 1 and 8 of the ’843 patent, and
`their related claims of induced and contributory infringement, at trial.
`5 Arendi: This language comes from the Third Circuit’s Model Jury Instructions at § 1.10
`(Preliminary Instructions – Preponderance of the Evidence), ll. 5-9. Defendants’ more legalistic
`“more probable than not” instruction is less informative for and accessible to lay jurors.
`6 Google: This language comes from the National Jury Instruction Project Model Patent Jury
`Instructions § 1.4
`(Burden of Proof—Preponderance of
`the Evidence), available at
`
`
`-8-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 11 of 21 PageID #: 48516
`
`Defendant Google contends that the claims of the ’843 patent are invalid. On this issue,
`
`Defendant Google has the burden of proof and must prove by clear and convincing evidence that
`
`the patent is invalid.
`
`[Arendi: When a party has the burden of proving any claim or defense by clear and
`
`convincing evidence, it means that the party must present evidence that leaves you with a firm
`
`belief or conviction that it is highly probable that the factual contentions of the claim or defense
`
`are true. This is a higher standard of proof than proof by a preponderance of the evidence.7]
`
`[Google: When a party has the burden of proof on any claim or defense by clear and
`
`convincing evidence, it means the evidence must persuade you that the claim or defense is highly
`
`probable. Such evidence requires a higher standard of proof than proof by a preponderance of the
`
`evidence.8]
`
`
`https://www.nationaljuryinstructions.org/documents/NationalPatentJuryInstructions.pdf. Arendi’s
`proposed instruction contains an expectation that the party without the burden of proof must or will
`present evidence to counter-balance the evidence presented by the party with the burden of proof,
`which risks confusing the jury and erroneously shifting the burdens. Arendi’s proposed instruction
`also risks juror confusion by inconsistently referring to a single “scale” and then “the [plural] scales.”
`7 Arendi: This language closely parallels the Third Circuit’s Model Jury Instructions at § 1.11
`(Preliminary Instructions – Clear and Convincing Evidence), ll. 3-7. The Model Patent Jury
`Instructions use similar language to describe the “clear and convincing” standard. Federal Circuit Bar
`Association, Model Patent Jury Instructions at 8 (asking jury to decide whether “you have been left
`with
`a
`clear
`conviction
`that
`the
`fact
`has
`been
`proven”),
`available
`at
`https://fedcirbar.org/integralsource/model-patent-jury-instructions. Defendants’ instruction seeks to
`water down its burden by removing reference to a “clear belief or conviction.” See e.g., LifeScan,
`Inc. v. Home Diagnostics, Inc., 103 F. Supp. 2d 345, 377 (D. Del. 2000), aff'd, 13 F. App’x 940 (Fed.
`Cir. 2001) (instructing jury that “testimony must have been clear, direct, and weighty so as to enable
`you to come to a clear conviction without hesitancy as to the truth of the precise facts in issue.”
`(emphasis added)); Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 566 F.3d 989, 994 (Fed. Cir.
`2009) (“Clear and convincing evidence places in the fact finder ‘an abiding conviction that the truth
`of [the] factual contentions are highly probable.” (quoting Colorado v. New Mexico, 467 U.S. 310,
`316 (1984) (emphasis added));
`8 Google: This language is adapted from the National Jury Instruction Project Model Patent Jury
`Instructions § 1.5
`(Burden of Proof—Clear and Convincing Evidence), available at
`https://www.nationaljuryinstructions.org/documents/NationalPatentJuryInstructions.pdf. Google’s
`proposed instruction aligns with both parties’ description of the clear-and-convincing-evidence
`standard in their proposed final jury instructions: “Clear and convincing evidence means evidence
`
`
`-9-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 12 of 21 PageID #: 48517
`
`You should base your decisions on all of the evidence, regardless of which party presented
`
`it.
`
`You may have heard of the term “proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” That is a stricter
`
`standard of proof and it applies only to criminal cases. It does not apply in civil cases such as this.
`
`You should therefore not consider that burden of proof in this case.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that it is highly probable that a fact is true.” Proposed Final Jury Instructions §§ 1.12, 4.1. Arendi’s
`proposed preliminary instruction diverges from its own (and Google’s) proposed final instructions
`and thus risks confusing the jury. Arendi’s proposed preliminary instruction even diverges from its
`own cited authorities and risks error and confusion by requiring both a clear conviction and that it be
`“highly probably” that facts are true. It also risks juror confusion by requiring a “firm” belief or
`conviction, which diverges from its own cited authorities’ reference to a “clear” belief or conviction.
`-10-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 13 of 21 PageID #: 48518
`
`VIII. DEPOSITION TESTIMONY
`
`I will now talk about the form of some of the evidence you will hear during trial. You may
`
`hear witnesses testify through deposition testimony.
`
`A deposition is the sworn testimony of a witness taken before trial. The witness is placed
`
`under oath and swears to tell the truth, and lawyers for each party may ask questions. A court
`
`reporter is present and records the questions and answers. The deposition may also be recorded on
`
`videotape.
`
`Deposition testimony is entitled to the same consideration and is to be judged, insofar as
`
`possible, in the same way as if the witness had been present to testify.
`
`
`
`
`
`-11-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 14 of 21 PageID #: 48519
`
`IX. DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`Certain models, reproductions, charts, summaries, or the like may be shown to you in order
`
`to help explain or illustrate the facts disclosed by the books, records, documents, testimony or other
`
`evidence in the case. Those models, reproductions, charts, summaries, or the like, referred to as
`
`“demonstratives,” are used by a party to describe something involved in the case. If they do not
`
`correctly reflect the facts shown by the evidence in the case, you should disregard those models,
`
`reproductions, charts, summaries, or the like and determine the facts from the evidence.
`
`Demonstratives are not themselves evidence or proof of any facts. However, a witness’s
`
`testimony that references a demonstrative is evidence.
`
`
`
`
`
`-12-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 15 of 21 PageID #: 48520
`
`X.
`
`
`
`NOTE-TAKING
`
`You will each be provided with a notebook that contains the following:
`
`●
`
`●
`
`A copy of the ’843 Patent;
`
`A listing of the Court’s claim constructions, which represent the Court’s
`
`instructions as to the meaning you should give to certain words and phrases
`
`in the patent;
`
`●
`
`A copy of the sample patent discussed in the video we watched earlier.
`
`You will also be given a notepad and a pen. If you wish, you may, but are not required to,
`
`take notes during the presentation of evidence, the summations of attorneys at the conclusion of
`
`the evidence, and during my instructions to you on the law. Notes may be helpful to you because
`
`at the end of the trial, you must make your decision based on what you recall of the evidence. You
`
`may not have a written transcript to consult, and it may not be practical for the court reporter to
`
`read back lengthy testimony. But do not let note-taking distract you to the point that you miss
`
`hearing other testimony from the witness. Your notes are only to be used as aids to your memory,
`
`and if your memory should later be different from your notes, you should rely on your memory
`
`and not your notes.
`
`Don’t be influenced by any notes that you take or that others take. A juror’s notes are not
`
`entitled to any greater weight than the recollection of each juror concerning the testimony. Notes
`
`are not to be used in place of the evidence.
`
`Do not take your notes away from court. I repeat, during lunchtime breaks and at the end
`
`of each day, please leave your notes in the jury room. At the conclusion of the case, after you have
`
`used your notes in deliberations, a court officer will collect and destroy them.
`
`During the trial, documents or other physical items may be received into evidence. You
`
`will not be supplied with a list of exhibits that are received in evidence. Therefore, you may wish
`
`-13-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 16 of 21 PageID #: 48521
`
`to make notes about the exhibits, especially their description and number, so that you can refer to
`
`those exhibits while you are deliberating. You will be given a hardcopy of every admitted exhibit
`
`to take to the jury room to use during deliberations.
`
`At the end of the trial, you must make your decision based on what you recall of the
`
`evidence. You will not have a written transcript of the testimony to review. So, above all, your
`
`memory will be your greatest asset when it comes time to deliberate and render a decision in this
`
`case.
`
`-14-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 17 of 21 PageID #: 48522
`
`
`
`XI.
`
`SIDEBARS
`
`During the trial it may be necessary for me to talk with the lawyers out of your hearing by
`
`having a bench conference, which is also called a sidebar, or by calling a recess and talking to
`
`them while you are out of the courtroom. If that happens, please be patient.
`
`We are not trying to keep important information from you. These conferences are necessary
`
`for me to fulfill my responsibility to be sure that evidence is presented to you correctly under the
`
`law. You should not speculate on what was said during these discussions.
`
`I may not always grant an attorney’s request for a sidebar. Do not consider my granting or
`
`denying a request for a conference as an indication of my opinion of the case or of what your
`
`verdict should be.
`
`-15-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 18 of 21 PageID #: 48523
`
`
`
`
`
`XII. CONDUCT OF THE JURY
`
`Now a few words about your conduct as jurors.
`
`First, I instruct you that during the trial you are not to discuss the case with anyone or
`
`permit anyone to discuss it in your presence. Until you retire to the jury room at the end of the case
`
`to deliberate on your verdict, you simply are not to talk about this case. This includes family and
`
`friends. Don’t discuss the case even with the other jurors until all of the jurors are in the jury room
`
`actually deliberating at the end of the case. Whenever you go to lunch or take a break, talk about
`
`anything you want to, but don’t talk about the case. Each of you should hold yourself completely
`
`apart from any discussion about this case with anyone until we get to the end of the case and then
`
`only with your fellow jurors when you go back to the jury room to deliberate.
`
`If any lawyer, party, or witness does not speak to you when you pass in the hall, ride the
`
`elevator, or the like, remember it is because they are not supposed to talk with you, nor you with
`
`them—they are not trying to be rude and will not interpret your silence as rudeness either. In this
`
`way, any unwarranted and unnecessary suspicion about your fairness can be avoided. If anyone
`
`should try to talk to you about the case, bring it to the Court’s attention promptly.
`
`Second, do not read or listen to anything touching on this case in any way. By that I mean
`
`that if there is a newspaper or internet article or television or radio report relating to this case, do
`
`not read the article or watch or listen to the report.
`
`Third, do not do any research or investigate the case on your own. Let me elaborate. During
`
`the course of the trial, you must not conduct any independent research about the case, the matters
`
`in the case, and the individuals or entities involved in the case. In other words, you should not
`
`consult dictionaries or reference materials (in print, electronic, or other format) or search websites
`
`or blogs on the internet. This trial concerns certain smartphones and smartphone apps similar to
`
`those that you may own. You may even have the products that this case is about. But you should
`
`-16-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 19 of 21 PageID #: 48524
`
`not conduct your own experiments using your devices to test evidence presented by either party.
`
`And, to reiterate, should there happen to be a newspaper article or television or radio report relating
`
`to this case, do not read the article or watch or listen to the report. It is important that you decide
`
`this case based solely on the evidence presented in the Courtroom. Do not try to find out
`
`information from any other sources.
`
`I know that many of you use cell phones, tablets, the internet, and other tools of technology. You
`
`must not use these tools to communicate electronically with anyone about the case or otherwise talk to
`
`anyone about this case. This includes your family and friends. You may not communicate with anyone
`
`about the case on your cell phone, through e-mail, your tablet, text messaging, through any blog or
`
`website, through any internet chat room, or by way of any other social networking or media
`
`platforms, including but not limited to Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, WeChat,
`
`WhatsApp, Snapchat, or YouTube.
`
`Finally, do not form any opinion until all the evidence is in. Keep an open mind until you
`
`start your deliberations at the end of the case. I will give you detailed instructions on the law at the
`
`end of the case, and those instructions will control your deliberations and decision.
`
`-17-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 20 of 21 PageID #: 48525
`
`
`
`XIII. COURSE OF THE TRIAL
`
`The case will now begin.
`
`First, each side may make an opening statement outlining their case. Opening statements
`
`are not evidence but simply an outline to help you understand what each party expects the evidence
`
`to show.
`
`Next, the parties will present their evidence. Plaintiff Arendi will present its witnesses and
`
`evidence in support of its claims, and Defendant Google may cross-examine those witnesses.
`
`When Plaintiff Arendi is finished, Defendant Google may present its witnesses and evidence, and
`
`Plaintiff Arendi may cross-examine those witnesses. Finally, Plaintiff Arendi may offer rebuttal
`
`witnesses to Google’s claims and defenses.
`
`After all the evidence is presented, the attorneys will offer closing arguments. The closing
`
`arguments are not evidence. Their purpose is to summarize and interpret the evidence for you.
`
`Both before and after closing arguments, I will give you instructions on the law and describe for
`
`you the matters you must resolve.
`
`You will then retire to the jury room to deliberate on your verdict.
`
`-18-
`
`

`

`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 451 Filed 03/31/23 Page 21 of 21 PageID #: 48526
`
`
`
`XIV. TRIAL SCHEDULE
`
`Though you have heard me say this during the jury selection process, I want to again outline
`
`the schedule I expect to maintain during the course of this trial.
`
`As I mentioned previously, once trial begins, this case is expected to take up to five (5)
`
`business days to try, between now and Friday, April 28.
`
`We will normally begin the day at 9:30 A.M. We will go until around 12:30 P.M. and,
`
`after about a 45-minute break for lunch, continue until 5:30 P.M. There will be a fifteen-minute
`
`break in the morning and another fifteen-minute break in the afternoon.
`
`What I have just outlined is the general schedule. It is possible there will be some
`
`interruptions as I have to attend to other matters.
`
`The only significant exception to this schedule may occur when the case is submitted to
`
`you for your deliberations. At that point, you will be permitted to deliberate as late as you wish.
`
`Please keep in mind that this is a timed trial. That means I have allocated each party a
`
`maximum number of hours in which to present all portions of its case. This allows me to assure
`
`you that we expect to be completed with this case by Friday.
`
`Of course, you can help me keep us on schedule by being here promptly each morning and
`
`being ready to proceed at the end of each break.
`
`-19-
`
`