`
`Original Version Filed: February 2, 2023
`
`Public Version Filed: February 9, 2023
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 434 Filed 02/09/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 47872
`
`I, Kemper P. Diehl, declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at Susman Godfrey L.L.P., admitted pro hac vice in this Court,
`
`and counsel for Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L (“Arendi”) in the above-captioned matter. I make this
`
`declaration in connection with the letter to the Honorable Jennifer L. Hall from Neal Belgam in
`
`opposition to Defendant’s motion to strike the expert damages opinion of Roy Weinstein. I have
`
`personal knowledge of the matters recited herein and if called upon to testify concerning them
`
`under oath, I could and would testify competently thereto.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the initial Expert Report of
`
`Roy Weinstein dated August 7, 2020.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the initial Reply Report of Roy
`
`Weinstein dated December 4, 2020.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
`
`true and correct.
`
`Executed this 2nd day of February 2023, at Seattle, Washington.
`
`/s/ Kemper P. Diehl
`Kemper P. Diehl
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
