`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 12-1595-LPS
`
`C.A. No. 12-1597-LPS
`
`C.A. No. 12-1601-LPS
`
`AREND! S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., and
`LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM
`U.S.A., INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`AREND! S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED and
`BLACKBERRY CORPORATION,
`
`Defendants.
`
`AREND! S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
`f/k/a MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC .,
`
`Defendant.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00920-LPS Document 324 Filed 03/31/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 14068
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS
`(USA) INC., f/k/a SONY ERICSSON
`MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`SONY CORPORATION, and SONY
`CORPORATION OF AMERICA,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`GOOGLELLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`OATH HOLDINGS INC. and
`OATH INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`C.A. No. 12-1602-LPS
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-LPS
`
`C.A. No. 13-920-LPS
`
`At Wilmington this 31st day of March, 2022:
`
`ORDER
`
`For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion issued this date,
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00920-LPS Document 324 Filed 03/31/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 14069
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Arendi's motion to exclude portions of Dr. Thomas Vander Veen's expert report
`
`(C.A. No. 12-1595 D.I. 268) is DENIED.
`
`2.
`
`Arendi's motion to exclude portions of Ms. Michele Riley's expert report (C.A.
`
`No. 13-920 D.I. 238) is GRANTED.
`
`3.
`
`The motions of all Defendants except BlackBerry to exclude opinions and
`
`testimony of Dr. M. Laurentius Marais (C.A. No. 12-1595 D.I. 266; C.A. No. 12-1601 D.I. 279;
`
`C.A. No. 12-1602 D.I. 230; C.A. No. 13-919 D.I. 283; C.A. No. 13-920 D.I. 241) are DENIED.
`
`4.
`
`BlackBerry' s motion to exclude opinions and testimony of Dr. M. Laurentius
`
`Marais (C.A. No. 12-1597 D.I. 200) is GRANTED.
`
`5.
`
`All Defendants' motions to exclude testimony of Mr. Roy Weinstein (C.A. No.
`
`12-1595 D.I. 270; C.A. No. 12-1597 D.I. 203; C.A. No. 12-1601 D.I. 282; C.A. No. 12-1602 D.I.
`
`236; C.A. No. 13-919 D.I. 286; C.A. No. 13-920 D.I. 246) are DENIED.
`
`6.
`
`BlackBerry's motion for summary judgment of no pre-suit damages (C.A. No. 12-
`
`1597 D.I. 207) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
`
`7.
`
`Because the Memorandum Opinion is filed under seal, the parties shall meet and
`
`confer and, no later than April 4, submit a proposed redacted version, accompanied by a
`
`supporting memorandum, detailing how, under applicable law, the Court may approve any
`
`requested redactions. In the absence of a timely, compliant request, the Court will unseal the
`
`entire opinion.
`
`8.
`
`These cases will be REASSIGNED to the Vacant Judgeship (2022) after the
`
`Court dockets a public version of its Memorandum Opinion.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
