throbber
Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 365 Filed 05/04/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 46343
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
`f/k/a MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
` C.A. No. 12-1601-LPS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` C.A. No. 13-919-LPS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF IBITUROKO-EMI LAWSON IN SUPPORT OF ARENDI’S
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE IN PART THE EXPERT REPORTS AND TESTIMONY OF
`EDWARD FOX
`
`
`I, Ibituroko-Emi Lawson, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am over 18 years of age, of sound mind, and otherwise competent to make this
`
`declaration. The evidence set out in the foregoing Declaration is based on my personal knowledge.
`
`2.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm Susman Godfrey LLP, counsel of record for
`
`Plaintiff, Arendi S.à.r.l. (“Arendi”), in the above-captioned action. I am admitted pro hac vice to
`
`practice before this Court.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Declaration of Brett M.
`
`Hutton, Esq. in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Expert Report of Peter Seifert and
`
`Preclude Mr. Seifert from Testifying at Trial Regarding Invalidity of the ’940 Patent, together with
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 365 Filed 05/04/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 46344
`
`Exhibit A to that declaration (entitled “Expert Report of Peter Seifert on the Invalidity of U.S.
`
`Patent RE39,940”), filed in Advanced Fiber Technologies (AFT) Trust v. J&L Fiber Services, Inc.,
`
`No. 07-1191 LEK/DRH (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2019).
`
`4.
`
`Together with Kemper Diehl and Neal Belgam, also counsel for Arendi, I met and
`
`conferred with counsel for Motorola Mobility LLC and Google LLC (“Defendants”) on March 4,
`
`2021. During that call, counsel discussed both Arendi’s instant Daubert motion to exclude against
`
`Dr. Fox and Defendants’ own intended motions against Arendi’s experts, Roy Weinstein and M.
`
`Laurentius Marais. Defendants had not previously informed Arendi of their intended Daubert
`
`motions. Contrary to Defendants’ assertion in their brief, counsel did not meet and confer “the
`
`night before” March 5, 2021 (C.A. No. 12-1601-LPS, D.I. 332, at 6), but rather at 12 pm EST
`
`during a teleconference proposed by Arendi’s counsel on February 25, 2021.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`Executed this 4th day of May, 2021, at Houston, Texas.
`
`/s/ Ibituroko-Emi Lawson
`Ibituroko-Emi Lawson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket