throbber
Case 1:13-cv-00920-LPS Document 265 Filed 03/12/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 9707
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 12-1595-LPS
`
`PUBLIC VERSION OF D.I. 274
`FILED: MARCH 12, 2021
`
`C.A. No. 12-1596-LPS
`
`PUBLIC VERSION OF D.I. 295
`FILED: MARCH 12, 2021
`
`C.A. No. 12-1597-LPS
`
`PUBLIC VERSION OF D.I. 206
`FILED: MARCH 12, 2021
`
`)))))))))))))
`
`))))))))))
`
`)))))))))))
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. and
`LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A.,
`INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`BLACKBERRY LIMITED and
`BLACKBERRY CORPORATION,
`
`Defendants.
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00920-LPS Document 265 Filed 03/12/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 9708
`
`C.A. No. 12-1601-LPS
`
`PUBLIC VERSION OF D.I. 285
`FILED: MARCH 12, 2021
`
`C.A. No. 12-1602-LPS
`
`PUBLIC VERSION OF D.I. 239
`FILED: MARCH 12, 2021
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-LPS
`
`PUBLIC VERSION OF D.I. 289
`FILED: MARCH 12, 2021
`
`C.A. No. 13-920-LPS
`
`PUBLIC VERSION OF D.I. 251
`FILED: MARCH 12, 2021
`
`)))))))))))
`
`))))))))))))))
`
`))))))))))
`
`))))))))))
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
`f/k/a MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA)
`INC. f/k/a SONY ERICSSON MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`SONY CORPORATION and
`SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA,
`
`Defendants.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`OATH HOLDINGS INC. and OATH INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00920-LPS Document 265 Filed 03/12/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 9709
`
`DECLARATION OF CHRISTINE K. CORBETT IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE ROY WEINSTEIN’S OPINIONS AND TESTIMONY UNDER
`FED. R. EVID. 702 AND DAUBERT
`
`I, Christine K. Corbett, submit this declaration in support of Defendants’ Motion to
`
`Exclude Roy Weinstein’s Opinions and Testimony Under Fed. R. Evid. 702 and Daubert.
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner at the law firm DLA Piper LLP (US), counsel for Defendant Apple
`
`Inc. in this case. If called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to the information
`
`set forth in this declaration.
`
`2.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of relevant excerpts of the
`
`November 5, 2019 Deposition Transcript of Atle Hedloy.
`
`3.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of relevant excerpts of the
`
`Deposition Transcript of Roy Weinstein in Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 12-1595-
`
`LPS;
`
`4.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of relevant excerpts of the
`
`Deposition Transcript of Roy Weinstein in Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Google Inc.., Case No. 13-919-
`
`LPS;
`
`5.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of relevant excerpts of the
`
`Deposition Transcript of Roy Weinstein in Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Motorola Mobility LLC f/k/a
`
`Motorola Mobility, Inc., Case No. 12-1601-LPS;
`
`6.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of relevant excerpts of the
`
`Deposition Transcript of Roy Weinstein in Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Sony Mobile Communications
`
`(USA) Inc., et. al., Case No. 12-1602-LPS and Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Oath Holdings Inc. and Oath
`
`Inc., Case No. 13-920-LPS.
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00920-LPS Document 265 Filed 03/12/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 9710
`
`7.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of relevant excerpts of the
`
`Deposition Transcript of Roy Weinstein in Arendi S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et. al., Case
`
`No. 12-1595-LPS.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. This declaration
`
`is executed on March 5, 2021, at Los Altos, California.
`
`/s/ Christine K. Corbett
`Christine K. Corbett
`
`

`

`Case 1:13-cv-00920-LPS Document 265 Filed 03/12/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 9711
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I, Brian A. Biggs, do hereby certify that on this 5th day of March, 2021, a true and correct
`copy of: DEFENDANT MOTION TO EXCLUDE ROY WEINSTEIN’S OPINIONS AND
`TESTIMONY UNDER FED. R. EVID. 702 AND DAUBERT was served on the following
`counsel of record vial electronic mail:
`
`Seth Ard
`Max I. Straus
`Beatrice Franklin
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1301 Avenue of the Americas
`32nd Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`sard@susmangodfrey.com
`mstraus@susmangodfrey.com
`bfranklin@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kemper Diehl
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
`Seattle, WA 98101
`kdiehl@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Neal C. Belgam
`Eve H. Ormerod
`SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS,
`LLP
`1000 West Street
`Suite 1501
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`nbelgam@skjlaw.com
`eormerod@skjlaw.com
`bas@skjlaw.com
`
`John P. Lahad
`Ibituroko-Emi Lawson
`Brenda Adimora
`Burton DeWitt
`Travis Korman
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1000 Louisiana Street
`Suite 5100
`Houston, TX 77002
`jlahad@susmangodfrey.com
`elawson@susmangodfrey.com
`badimora@susmangodfrey.com
`bdewitt@susmangodfrey.com
`tkorman@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kalpana Srinivasan
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1900 Avenue of the Stars
`Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket