`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-LPS
`
`C.A. No. 12-1601-LPS
`
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
`f/k/a MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE IN PART THE EXPERT
`REPORTS AND TESTIMONY OF EDWARD FOX
`
`Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L. respectfully moves this Court to exclude portions of the expert
`
`reports and testimony of Motorola Mobility LLC and Google LLC’s invalidity expert, Edward
`
`Fox, concerning invalidity under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. The grounds for this Motion are fully
`
`set forth in the Opening Brief in Support of this Motion, filed contemporaneously herewith.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Seth Ard
`Beatrice Franklin
`Max Straus
`SUSMAN GODFREY, LLP
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`sard@susmangodfrey.com
`bfranklin@susmangodfrey.com
`mstraus@susmangodfrey.com
`
`
`
`SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS LLP
`
`/s/ Neal C. Belgam
`Neal C. Belgam (No. 2721)
`Eve H. Ormerod (No. 5369)
`1000 West Street, Suite 1501
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 652-8400
`nbelgam@skjlaw.com
`eormerod@skjlaw.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 272 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 9081
`
`
`
`
`John Lahad
`Ibituroko-Emi Lawson
`Burton DeWitt
`Robert Travis Korman
`Brenda Adimora
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, TX 77002-5096
`jlahad@susmangodfrey.com
`elawson@susmangodfrey.com
`bdewitt@susmangodfrey.com
`tkorman@susmangodfrey.com
`badimora@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kalpana Srinivasan
`1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Kemper Diehl
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
`Seattle, WA 98101-3000
`kdiehl@susmangodfrey.com
`
`
`Dated: March 5, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO D. DEL. LR 7.1.1.
`
`Pursuant to D. Del. LR 7.1.1., counsel for Plaintiff hereby certify that they have conferred
`
`with counsel for Defendant in the above-captioned action, including verbal communication
`
`involving Delaware counsel, and counsel for Defendant have indicated that they oppose the relief
`
`sought in this motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Neal C. Belgam
`Neal C. Belgam (No. 2721)
`
`
`
`2
`
`