`
`
`
`October 30, 2019
`
`VIA CM/ECF
`The Honorable Leonard P. Stark
`J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
`844 N. King Street
`Room 6124, Unit 26
`Wilmington, DE 19801-3555
`
`Re: Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Google LLC, C.A. No. 13-919-LPS
`
`Dear Chief Judge Stark:
`
`We write on behalf of the Plaintiff in the above-referenced matter to respectfully request
`
`the scheduling of a discovery teleconference.
`
`The following attorneys, including at least one Delaware Counsel and at least one Lead
`
`Counsel per party, participated in a verbal meet-and-confer (by telephone) on October 1, 2019:
`
`Delaware Counsel: Neal C. Belgam (on behalf of Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.)
`
`
`
`David E. Moore (on behalf of Defendant Google LLC)
`
`Lead Counsel:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Max Straus (on behalf of Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.)
`Robert Unikel (on behalf of Defendant Google LLC)
`
`The dispute requiring judicial attention is listed below:
`
`• Google’s refusal to present a corporate representative to testify with respect to the
`accused InBox by Gmail application
`
`
`
`Plaintiff sought Google’s input in filing this letter, but Google does not agree that this issue
`requires the Court’s intervention. Plaintiff believes the Court’s intervention is necessary, as
`Google has not confirmed whether it will provide a corporate representative to testify with respect
`to the accused InBox by Gmail application.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Neal C. Belgam
`
`Neal C. Belgam (#2721)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 178 Filed 10/30/19 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 5680
`The Honorable Leonard P. Stark
`October 30, 2019
`Page 2
`
`
`
`cc: Clerk of Court (via CM/ECF)
`All Counsel of Record (via CM/ECF)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
