`
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`1201 North Market Street
`Suite 2100
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801-1147
`www.dlapiper.com
`
`Denise Seastone Kraft
`denise.kraft@dlapiper.com
`T 302.468.5645
`F 302.778.7917
`
`July 25, 2019
`
`The Honorable Leonard P. Stark
`J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
`844 N. King Street
`Unit 26 Room 6124
`Wilmington, DE 19801-3555
`
`Re: Arendi S.A.R.L. v. LG Elecs., Inc., et. al., C.A. No. 12-1595-LPS
`Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc., C.A. No. 12-1596-LPS
`Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Blackberry Ltd., et. al., C.A. No. 12-1597-LPS
`Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Microsoft Mobile, Inc., C.A. No. 12-1599-LPS
`Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Motorola Mobility LLC, et. al., C.A. No. 12-1601-LPS
`Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Sony Mobile Commc’ns (USA) Inc., et. al., C.A. No. 12-1602-LPS
`Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Google LLC, C.A. No. 13-919-LPS
`Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Oath Holdings Inc., et. al., C.A. No. 13-920-LPS
`
`Dear Chief Judge Stark:
`
`We represent Defendant Apple Inc. in the above-referenced cases and write on behalf of
`all parties regarding the claim construction hearing scheduled for July 26, 2019. Subject to the
`Court’s approval, the parties jointly propose that the parties proceed term-by-term on the
`disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,917,843 and 8,306,993 as follows:
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 7,917,843 and 8,306,993
`1.
`“document”
`2.
`“first information”
`3.
`“computer program” / “first computer program” / “second computer
`program”
`“to determine if the first information is at least one of a plurality of
`types of information that can be searched for”
`“wherein the computer implemented method is configured to perform each
`of action (i), action (ii), and action (iii) using the first contact information
`previously identified as a result of the analyzing”
`“providing for the user an input device configured so that a single execute
`command from the input device is sufficient to cause the performing”
`“that allows a user to enter a user command to initiate an operation”
`“providing an input device configured by the first computer program” /
`“providing an input device configured by the document editing program”
`“while it is electronically displayed”
`
`9.
`
`WEST\287187168.2
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`8.
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-LPS Document 133 Filed 07/25/19 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 5053
`
`The Honorable Leonard P. Stark
`July 25, 2019
`Page Two
`
`Further, Arendi S.A.R.L. and Google LLC would like to reserve 35-40 minutes at the end
`of the hearing to address disputed terms specific to U.S. Patent No. 7,496,854. The parties
`jointly propose that the parties proceed term-by-term on the disputed terms specific to U.S.
`Patent No. 7,496,854 as follows:
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,496,854
`1.
`“first application program” and “second application program”
`2.
`“means for marking without user intervention the first information to alert
`the user that the first information can be utilized in a second application
`program”
`“means for identifying without user intervention or designation the first
`information”
`“inserting a second information into the document”
`“performing an operation related to second information”
`“initializing the second application program.”
`
`4.
`5.
`6.
`
`3.
`
`The parties are available should the Court have any questions.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`
`/s/ Denise S. Kraft
`Denise S. Kraft (DE Bar No. 2778)
`
`DSK:
`
`cc: All counsel for the parties (via Electronic Mail)
`
`WEST\287187168.2
`
`