`Case 1:12—cv—00398—GMS Document 35-1 Filed 05/06/13 Page 1 of 4 Page|D #: 677
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 35-1 Filed 05/06/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 678
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Washington, D.C.
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN CAMERAS AND MOBILE
`DEVICES, RELATED SOFTWARE AND
`FIRMWARE, AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`ANDPROOUCTSCONTAININGTHESAME
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-842
`
`Order No.3: Setting Target Date
`
`By publication of a notice in the Feder~! Register on May 2, 2012, pursuant to subsection
`
`(b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the Commission instituted this
`
`investigation to determine:
`
`[W]hether there is a violation of subsection ( a)(1 )(B) of section
`337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for
`importation, or the sale within the United States after importation
`of certain cameras and mobile devices, related software and
`firmware, and components thereof and products containing same
`that infringe one or more of claims 1-3 and 22 of the '003 patent
`[U.S. Patent No. 6,665,003] and claims 1-3, 10, 20,27-29, 36, and
`37 of the '284 patent [U.S. Patent No. 7,477,284], and whether an
`industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
`of section 337.
`
`77 Fed. Reg. 26041 (2012).
`
`The complainant is HumanEyes Technologies, Ltd. of Jerusalem, Israel. The respondents
`
`are Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Corporation of America ofNew York, New York;
`
`Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego, California; Sony Mobile Communications AB ofLondon,
`.
`United Kingdom; and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia.
`
`The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is a party in this investigation. /d.
`
`Base(! upon the complaint, the notice of investigation, and the parties' discovery
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 35-1 Filed 05/06/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 679
`
`statements, the undersigned has determined that the initial determination on alleged violation of
`
`section 337 shall be due on May 3, 2013, and that the target date for completion of this
`
`investigation is September 3, 2013, which is 16 months after institution of the investigation. See
`
`19 C.F.R § 210.51(a); 19 C.F.R. § 210.42(a)(1Xi).
`
`So ordered.
`
`~ David P. Shaw
`
`·
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`Issued: May 18,2012
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 35-1 Filed 05/06/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 680
`
`CERTAIN CAMERAS'ANDMOBILEDEVICES,RELATEDSOFfWARE,ANDFIRMWARE,
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING THE SAME
`337-TA-842
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached ORDER NO. 3 has been served by hand upon the
`Commission Investigative Attorney, Daniel Girdwood, Esq., and the followingparties as indicated,
`on
`May 21, 2012
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street SW, Room 112A
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`FOR COMPLAINANT HUMANEYES
`TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.:
`
`Steven S. Cherensky, Esq.
`TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Overnight Mail.
`(X1 Via First Class Mail
`( ) Other: ___ _
`
`FOR RESPONDENTS SONY CORP.; SONY
`CORP. OF AMERICA; SONY
`ELECTRONICS INC.; SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS AB; AND SONY
`MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.:
`
`Wesley W. Jones, Esq.
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`1500 K St., N. W.
`Washington, D. C. 20005
`
`Heather Hall
`LEXIS~NEXIS
`9443 Springboro Pike
`Miamisburg, OH 45342
`
`Kenneth Clair
`Thomson West
`1100 Thirteen Street, NW, Suite 200
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Overnight Mail
`~ Via First Class Mail
`( ·) Other: ___ _
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via Overnight Mail
`. ~ Via First Class Mail
`( ) Other: ___ _
`
`( ) Via Hand Delivery
`( ) Via OVernight Mail
`, ('<j' Via First Class Mail
`( ) Other:
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
