throbber
Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 21 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 109
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 21 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 3 Page|D #: 109
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`HUMANEYES TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`C.A. No. 12-3 98-GMS
`
`SONY ELECTRONICS INC., SONY
`CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION OF
`AMERICA, SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS AB, and SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`MOTION AND ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 and the attached certification, counsel moves the admission
`
`pro hac vice of Iuliana Tanase, Esquire, of the law firm Kenyon & Kenyon LLP to represent the
`
`Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics lnc., Sony
`
`Mobile Communications AB, and Sony Mobil_e Communications (USA) Inc. in the above-
`
`captioned action.
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`John Flock
`Michelle Carniaux
`Sheila Mortazavi
`Juliana Tanase
`
`Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1050
`(212) 425-7200
`
`Dated: January 15, 2013
`
`RLFI 792I578v.1
`
`/s/ Elizabeth R. He
`
`Chad M. Shandler (#3796)
`Elizabeth R. He (#5345)
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`One Rodney Square
`920 N. King Street
`Wilmington , DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`Shandler@rlf.com
`He@rlf.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Sony Electronics
`Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of
`America, Sony Mobile Communications AB,
`and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 21 Filed 01/15/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 110
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 21 Filed 01/15/13 Page 2 of 3 Page|D #: 110
`
`CERTIFICATION BY COUNSEL
`
`TO BE ADMITTED FRO HAC VICE
`
`Pursuant to Locai Civil Rule 83.5, I hereby certify that I am eiigibie for acsimission to this
`
`Court, and that I am admitted, practicing, and in good standing as a member of the Bar of New
`
`Y_orl<, the Eastern and Southeni District of New York and the bar New Jersey, and the District of
`
`New Jersey. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.6, I submit to the ‘disciplinary jurisdiction of this
`
`C-ouit. for any alleged- misconduct which occurs in the course of, or in the preparation of, this
`
`"action.
`
`I also certify that I am generally familiar with the Rules of this Court.
`
`In accordance
`
`with the Standing Order for District Court I-“tmd =etTec.tive 1/1/05, 1 further co'rtia“y that the annual
`
`‘fee of $’2..S.00 fee paynient will be submitted to the Cl<::rk’s Office upon the f'1'ii.ng, of this Motion.
`
`Date: January 14,2013
`
` ‘
`
`
`
`Iuliana Tanase
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`Ono Broadway
`New York, NY 10004
`Telephone: 212~425«7200
`.Facsim'i1o: 212425-5288
`Email: jtanase@ke-‘ny'0n.c0m.
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 21 Filed 01/15/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 111
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 21 Filed 01/15/13 Page 3 of 3 Page|D #: 111
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counse1’s motion for admission pro hac vice is granted.
`
`ORDER GRANTING MOTION
`
`Dated:
`
`, 2013
`
`U.S. District Judge Gregory M. Sleet
`
`RLFI 79215"/'8v.1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket