throbber
Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 20 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 106
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 20 Filed 01/15/13 Page 1 of 3 Page|D #: 106
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`HUMANEYES TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`C.A. No. 12-398-GMS
`
`SONY ELECTRONICS INC., SONY
`CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION OF
`AMERICA, SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS AB, and SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`MOTION AND ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 and the attached certification, counsel moves the admission
`
`pro hac vice of John Flock, Esquire, of the law firm Kenyon & Kenyon LLP to represent the
`
`Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Corporations of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Sony
`
`Mobile Communications AB, and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. in the above-
`
`captioned action.
`
`Of Counsel.‘
`
`John Flock
`Michelle Carniaux
`Sheila Mortazavi
`Juliana Tanase
`Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1050
`(212) 425-7200
`
`Dated: January 15, 2013
`
`RLFI 7921577Y.1
`
`/s/ Elizabeth R. He
`Chad M. Shandler (#3796)
`Elizabeth R. He (#5345)
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`One Rodney Square
`920 N. King Street
`Wilmington , DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`Shandle-r@rlf.com
`He@rlf.com
`
`Aitorneysfor Defendants Sony Electronics
`Inc., Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of
`America, Sony Mobile Communications AB,
`and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 20 Filed 01/15/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 107
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 20 Filed 01/15/13 Page 2 of 3 Page|D #: 107
`
`CE-R'I‘IF.ICATION BY COUNSEL
`
`TO BE ADMITTED IJRO HAC VICE
`
`Pursuant" to Local Civil Rule 83.5, I certify that I am eligible for admission to this Court,
`
`and that E airi admitted, practicing, and in good standing as a member of the Bar of the State of
`
`New Yerk, and am 'adm.i.t1ed to practice before the United States Ceurts of Appeal fer the Fifth
`
`Circuit and the Federal Circuit and the United States District Courts for the Southern, Western
`
`and. Eastern. Districts of New York.
`
`Pursuant
`
`to Local Civil Rule 83.6,
`
`E submit to the
`
`disciplinary juri.sdict'it)n of this Court for any alleged misennduct which occurs in the course of,
`
`or in the preparation of, this action.
`
`I also certify that I am generally familiar with the Rules of
`
`this Court.
`
`In accordance with the Standing Order for District Court Fund effective 1;’ 1/055 .1.
`
`furtlter certify that the annual fee of $25.00 fee payinezit will be submitted to the Clerk’s Office
`
`upon. the filing ofthis Motion.
`
`Date: January 15, 2013
`
`ck
`Jo
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`
`One Broadway
`M New York, NY 10004
`Telephone: 212-425-7200
`Facsimile: 2l2—425»S283
`"Email: jfl0ck@l<eny0n.e01n
`
`

`
`Case 1:12-cv-00398-GMS Document 20 Filed 01/15/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 108
`Case 1:12—cv—OO398—GMS Document 20 Filed 01/15/13 Page 3 of 3 Page|D #: 108
`
`ORDER GRANTING MOTION
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counse1’s motion for admission pro hac vice is granted.
`
`Dated:
`
`, 2013
`
`U.S. District Judge Gregory M. Sleet
`
`RLF17921577v.1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket