`Case 1:10—cv—00258—SLR—MPT Document 462 Filed 11/08/12 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #: 9078
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`MOBILEMEDIA IDEAS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.
`
`Defendant .
`
`\/\./2/xyx./saxzx./~y
`
`Civ. No. 10-258—SLR
`
`0 R D E R
`
`At Wilmington this 8th day of November, 2012, consistent with the memorandum
`
`opinion issued this same date;
`
`IT IS ORDERED that
`
`1. Defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s newly proposed claim constructions and
`
`claim terms (D.|. 265) is denied as moot, to the extent the court has not adopted
`
`plaintiff’s newly proposed claim constructions or claim terms for summary judgment.
`
`2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on defendant's defenses of waiver,
`
`laches, and/or estoppel (D.l. 300) is granted. With respect to prosecution history
`
`estoppel, plaintiff’s motion is granted insofar as it is used as an affirmative defense.
`
`3. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity (D.l. 305) is granted in
`
`part and denied in part. The motion is granted with respect to all asserted claims of the
`
`‘828 and ‘942 patents.
`
`4. Defendant’s motion for summaryjudgment of non—infringement
`
`(D.l. 328) is
`
`granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted with respect to direct
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 462 Filed 11/08/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 9079
`Case 1:10—cv—00258—SLR—MPT Document 462 Filed 11/08/12 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: 9079
`
`infringement and induced infringement of claims 1, 7, and 8 of the ‘068 patent and all
`
`asserted claims of the ‘231 and ‘394 patents.
`
`5. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment of no invalidity (D.|. 329) is granted in
`
`part and denied in part. The motion is granted with respect to no invalidity of all
`
`asserted claims of the ‘068 patent and with respect to no anticipation of all asserted
`
`claims of the ‘075, ‘394, and ‘155 patents.
`
`6. Defendant’s motion to strike portions of untimely supplemental expert report
`
`of Dr. Gareth Loy and declarations of Dr. Gareth Loy and Dr. Sigurd Meldal (D.l. 377) is
`
`denied.
`
`7. Plaintiff’s motion to strike portions of Apple’s Grimes declaration (D.l. 414) is
`
`denied.
`
`United States éistrict Judge