`r--...~]~''{M
`I 0 J
`-
`~~.
`
`~_sl0c~©Ut~@
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`MOBILEMEDIA IDEAS, LLC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Civ. No. 10-258-SLR
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`VERDICT SHEET
`
`Dated: December 11, 2012
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 9859
`
`We, the jury, unanimously find as follows:
`
`I. U.S. Patent No. 6,070,068 ("The '068 Patent")
`
`A. Direct Infringement
`
`1. Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of the
`
`evidence, that each and every limitation of claim 23 and/or claim 24 of the '068 patent is
`
`found in the accused Apple iPhones (hereinafter, "Apple's iPhones")?
`
`Checking 'yes" below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the Apple.
`
`Claim Verdict on direct
`infringement
`~if yes
`~yes
`
`0 no
`
`0 no
`
`23
`
`24
`
`B. Indirect Infringement - Inducing Infringement
`
`2. Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of the
`
`evidence, that Apple has induced the infringement of claim 23 and/or claim 24 of the
`
`'068 patent?
`
`Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the Apple.
`
`Claim Verdict on inducement
`of infringement
`~no
`[1f no
`
`0 yes
`
`0 yes
`
`23
`
`24
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 9860
`
`C. Validity
`
`3. Do you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that the
`
`asserted claims of the '068 patent are invalid as being anticipated?
`
`Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the MobileMedia.
`
`Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
`
`Claim No
`{VaHd)
`
`Yes
`(Invalid,
`anticipated)
`23 ~ D
`g'
`24
`D
`
`4. Do you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that the
`
`asserted claims of the '068 patent are invalid as being obvious?
`
`Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the MobileMedia.
`
`Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
`
`Claim No
`{Valid)
`
`Yes
`{Invalid due to
`obviousness)
`23 ~ D
`rt(
`24
`D
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 9861
`
`11. U.S. Patent No. 6,253,075 ("The '075 Patent")
`
`A. Direct Infringement
`
`1. Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of the
`
`evidence, that each and every limitation of claim 5, claim 6, and/or claim 10 of the '075
`
`patent is found in Apple's iPhones?
`
`Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the Apple.
`
`If you answer "no" with respect to claim 5, you must answer "no" with
`respect to dependent claim 6 for purposes of this question.
`
`Claim Verdict on direct
`infringement
`
`5
`
`6
`
`10
`
`0 no
`
`0 no
`
`0 no
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 9862
`
`B. Indirect Infringement - Inducing Infringement
`
`2. Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of the
`
`evidence, that Apple has induced the infringement of claim 5 and/or claim 6 of the '075
`
`patent?
`
`Checking 'yes" below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the Apple.
`
`If you answer "no" with respect to claim 5, you must answer "no" with
`respect to dependent claim 6 for purposes of this question.
`
`Claim Verdict on inducement
`of infringement
`
`5
`
`6
`
`0 yes
`
`0 yes
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 9863
`
`C. Validity
`
`3. Do you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that the
`
`asserted claims of the '075 patent are invalid as being obvious?
`
`Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the MobileMedia.
`
`Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
`
`If you find that claim 5 is valid and not obvious, you must find that
`dependent claim 6 is also valid and not obvious for purposes of this
`question.
`
`Claim No
`(Valid)
`
`Yes
`(Invalid due to
`obviousness)
`5 ~ 0
`g-'
`6
`0
`[{('
`
`10
`
`0
`
`5
`
`
`
`-......
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 9864
`
`Ill. U.S. Patent No. 6,427,078 ("The '078 Patent")
`
`A. Direct Infringement
`
`1. Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of the
`
`evidence, that each and every limitation of claim 73 of the '078 patent is found in
`
`Apple's iPhones?
`
`Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
`
`Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the Apple.
`
`Claim Verdict on direct
`infringement
`
`73
`
`Vyes
`
`D no
`
`B. Validity
`
`2. Do you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`claim 73 of the '078 patent is invalid as being anticipated?
`
`Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the MobileMedia.
`
`Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
`
`Claim No
`(Valid)
`
`Yes
`(Invalid,
`anticipated)
`73 ~ D
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 9865
`
`3. Do you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`claim 73 of the '078 patent is invalid as being obvious?
`
`Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the MobileMedia.
`
`Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
`
`Claim No
`(Valid)
`
`Yes
`(Invalid due to
`obviousness)
`73 ~ D
`
`7
`
`