throbber
Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 9 Filed 11/04/19 Page 1 of 3
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
`
`
`E-NUMERATE SOLUTIONS, INC. and
`E-NUMERATE, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`THE UNITED STATES,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 19-859 C
`
`Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby
`
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME OF THE BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
`PURSUANT TO RCFC 12(b)(6) AND 35 U.S.C. § 101
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs e-Numerate Solutions, Inc. and e-Numerate, LLC (collectively “e-Numerate”)
`
`and Defendant United States (“the Government”) jointly move this Court for an enlargement of
`
`time for e-Numerate to file its Answering Brief on the Government’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant
`
`to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims and 35 U.S.C. § 101 and for the
`
`Government to file its Reply Brief on said motion. Specifically, the parties jointly request: (1)
`
`that e-Numerate’s Answering Brief be due on December 20, 2019; and (2) that the Government’s
`
`Reply Brief be due on January 24, 2020. This is the first request by the parties for an extension
`
`of the response and reply deadlines for this motion. The grounds for this motion are as follows.
`
`E-Numerate filed this suit on June 11, 2019 (D.I. 1) accusing the Government of
`
`infringing seven patents. E-Numerate asserted a total of 77 claims in those patents in its
`
`Complaint. The Government requested an enlargement of 60 days to move, answer or otherwise
`
`respond to the Complaint on a variety of grounds. See D.I. 5. E-Numerate did not oppose this
`
`request. See D.I. 6. As a result, the Government was effectively given 120 days to prepare its
`
`Motion to Dismiss after the filing of the Complaint.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 9 Filed 11/04/19 Page 2 of 3
`
`E-Numerate’s Response Brief is presently due on November 8, 2019 absent an
`
`enlargement. This is four weeks from the date the Government filed its motion to dismiss the
`
`Complaint in its entirety. E-Numerate’s Request seeks an additional 42 days to prepare its
`
`Answering Brief. This enlargement is roughly commensurate with the additional time the
`
`Government was granted to prepare its Motion to Dismiss beyond the original due date for its
`
`response to the Complaint.
`
`E-Numerate’s Request is additionally supported on the grounds that the issues involved
`
`in the Government’s motion are complex in that there are seven patents-in-suit and a total of 77
`
`presently asserted claims that have different claim language. Each patent must be addressed in
`
`response to the Government’s motion.
`
`E-Numerate is amenable to enlarging the deadline for the Government’s Reply Brief until
`
`January 24, 2020. If e-Numerate’s response brief is filed on December 20, 2019, the
`
`Government’s reply brief would be due on January 3, 2020, absent an enlargement. Thus, if the
`
`Court extends the response brief deadline, the parties jointly request that the Court also extend
`
`the reply brief deadline by 21 days, to January 24, 2020. The reason for this enlargement is to
`
`avoid the Government’s time for replying to Plaintiffs’ response largely running during year-end
`
`holidays.
`
`Granting this enlargement does not prejudice either party. There is no Scheduling Order
`
`in place and formal discovery has not yet commenced.
`
`For the above reasons, e-Numerate and the Government respectfully request that this
`
`motion be granted and that the briefing schedule on the Government’s Motion To Dismiss be
`
`enlarged as follows: (1) e-Numerate’s Answering Brief is due on December 20, 2019; and (2)
`
`the Government’s Reply Brief is due on January 24, 2020.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 9 Filed 11/04/19 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`Dated: November 4, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`November 4, 2019
`
`
`
`Of Counsel:
`SHAHAR HAREL
`Department of Justice
`
`RICHARD M. HUMES
`Associate General Counsel
`GEORGE C. BROWN
`Assistant General Counsel
`NELSON KUAN
`Senior Counsel
`Office of the General Counsel
`U.S. Securities and Exchange
`Commission
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`O’KELLY ERNST & JOYCE, LLC
`
`/s/Sean T. O’Kelly
`Sean T. O’Kelly
`901 N. Market Street, Suite 1000
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`(302) 778-4000
`(302) 295-2873 (facsimile)
`sokelly@oelegal.com
`
`and
`
`O’ROURKE LAW OFFICE, LLC
`Gerard M. O'Rourke
`1201 N. Orange Street
`Suite 7260
`Wilmington, DE 19801-1186
`(484) 770-8046
`gorourke@orourkefirm.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs e-Numerate
`Solutions, Inc. and e-Numerate LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`JOSEPH H. HUNT
`Assistant Attorney General
`
`GARY L. HAUSKEN
`Director
`
`s/Scott Bolden
`SCOTT BOLDEN
`Deputy Director
`Commercial Litigation Branch
`Civil Division
`Department of Justice
`Washington, DC 20530
`Email:
`Scott.Bolden@USDOJ.gov
`Telephone:
`(202) 307-0262
`Facsimile:
`(202) 307-0345
`
`COUNSEL FOR THE UNITED STATES OF
`AMERICA
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket