`
`In the United States Court of Federal Claims
`
`
`
`E-NUMERATE SOLUTIONS, INC., et
`al.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`THE UNITED STATES,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`No. 19-859C
`
`Filed: August 5, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`On July 19, 2019, the government filed a motion for a 60-day enlargement of time to file
`
`an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in the above-captioned matter, pursuant to Rule
`
`6(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (docket entry no. 5). Counsel for
`
`the government states that the additional time is necessary for the government to analyze the
`
`claims and prosecution histories for all seven patents at issue in this case and to review and
`
`address the allegations in the complaint. Id. at 3. In addition, the government states that the
`
`additional time is necessary because the United States Patent and Trademark Office is currently
`
`reviewing four of the seven patents at issue, and so waiting for the agency’s decision could
`
`streamline the litigation in this case. Id. at 4.
`
`On August 2, 2019, plaintiffs filed a response to the government motion for an
`
`enlargement of time (docket entry no. 6). Counsel for plaintiffs states that they do not oppose
`
`the government’s motion. Id.
`
`In view of the foregoing, and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 7 Filed 08/05/19 Page 2 of 2
`
`government’s motion for an enlargement of time. The government shall FILE an answer or
`
`otherwise respond to the complaint on or before October 11, 2019.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Lydia Kay Griggsby
`LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY
`Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
