`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 1 of 75
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 2 of 75
`
`
`
`REVISED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`A. ’355 Patent
`
`’355 Patent - Term 1: Plaintiff disputes this term.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`series of numerical
`values having tags
`indicating
`characteristics of the
`numerical values
`
`
`1, 27, 28 and 54 A set of one or more
`numerical values
`having markup
`language tags
`wherein the markup
`language tags for the
`one or more
`numerical values
`have more than one
`attribute that explains
`the meaning of the
`numerical values
`
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’355 Patent at
`Abstract, 2:1-2,
`4:28-30, 8:38-40,
`15:43-46, 17:57-
`60, 20:23-59,
`21:31-33, 24:50-
`60, 25:34-37.
`
`
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘355 Patent at
`Abstract; Col. 4,
`lines 28 - 30; Col. 8,
`lines 38 - 40;
`Figure 10, steps
`1010 and 1012;
`Figure 21 steps
`2106 and 2018; Col.
`7, lines 7 – 11; col.
`7, lines 42-44; Col.
`16, lines 55 – 57;
`Figure 4 and Col.
`17, line 55 – col.
`18, line 3; col. 18,
`lines 22 – 25; col.
`18, lines 50 – 60;
`col. 19, lines 12 –
`14; col. 19, line 57
`– col. 20, line 1;
`col. 20, lines 11 –
`64; col. 24, lines 50
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`(incorporating
`Defendant’s
`construction of
`“tag/tags”).
`Defendant maintains
`that the term “tag”
`should be construed
`as “markup language
`tag” and “tags” as
`“markup language
`tags.” Alternatively,
`to the extent the
`term is construed as
`a whole, Defendant
`proposes
`“A set of one or
`more numerical
`values having
`markup language
`tags wherein the
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 3 of 75
`
`markup language
`tags for the one or
`more numerical
`values have one or
`more attributes that
`describe the
`meaning of the one
`or more numerical
`values.”
`
`– 60; col. 25, lines
`34 – 37;
`
`‘816 patent, claim
`27 (claim
`differentiation)
`(“characteristic”);
`
`Appendix B of
`‘383, ‘384, ’748 and
`‘337 patents via
`incorporation by
`reference;
`
`
`
`’355 Patent - Term 2: Defendant disputes this term.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`tag/tags
`
`’355 Patent:
`claims 1, 13, 14,
`15, 27, 28, 40,
`41, 42, 54
`
`’816 Patent:
`claims 1, 3 – 8,
`10, 17 and 19 –
`27
`
`’383 Patent:
`claims 1, 4, 17
`
` “Tag” should not be
`construed as a stand-
`alone term because e-
`Numerate has
`identified a phrase for
`construction. In
`addition, the claim
`language uses the
`term “tags” in the
`plural. To the extent
`“tags” is construed,
`e-Numerate contends
`
`e-Numerate Intrinsic
`and Extrinsic
`Support
`‘355 Patent at Col. 1,
`lines 32 – 36
`
`‘816 Patent at Col. 1,
`lines 37 – 41;
`
`See citations from
`‘355 and ‘816
`patents which are
`incorporated by
`reference into the
`‘383 patent.
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`“Tag” should be
`construed as “markup
`language tag” and
`“tags” as “markup
`language tags.”
`Further, a markup
`language is “a
`language that uses
`tags to define
`elements within a
`document. Examples
`of markup languages
`
`Defendant Intrinsic
`and Extrinsic
`Support
`’355 Patent at
`Abstract, 1:65-66,
`2:1-2, 4:28-30,
`8:38-40, 9:5-6,
`15:43-46, 17:57-
`60, 20:23-59,
`21:31-33, 24:50-
`60, 25:34-37.
`
`’816 Patent at
`Abstract; 2:1-4;
`2:6-7; 4:31-33;
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 4 of 75
`
`that the term “tags”
`should be construed
`as “markup language
`tags”.
`
`include HTML, XML
`and XBRL.”
`
`8:41-43; 9:8-9;
`15:43-46; 17:56-
`59; 20:24-57;
`21:22-25; 24:40-
`50; 25:25-28;
`25:30-33.
`
`’383 Patent at
`Abstract, 3:49:51,
`6:46-48, 7:13-14,
`13:47-50,
`15:61:64, 18:48-
`19:13, 19:51-52,
`23:9-20, 23:62-65.
`
`
`
`’355 Patent - Term 3: Joint
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`macro
`
`1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 25,
`26, 27, 28, 29,
`30, 31, 33, 52,
`53, 54, 55
`
`Interpreted code that
`performs one or more
`well-defined,
`generally limited
`tasks
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Short program which
`performs one or more
`well-defined, limited
`tasks
`
`Defendant Intrinsic
`and Extrinsic
`Support
`’355 Patent at 2:55-
`57.
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘355 Patent at Col.
`2, lines 54 – 62;
`col. 3, lines 11 –
`15; col. 7, lines 37
`– 39; col. 13, lines
`27 – 43; col. 53,
`lines 22 – 32.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 5 of 75
`
`
`
`’355 Patent -Term 4: Plaintiff disputes this term.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`transform the series
`of numerical values
`into a new
`representation of
`the series of
`numerical values
`
`
`1, 27, 28 and 54 Converting the series
`of one or more
`numerical values and
`one or more of the
`attributes for the
`numerical values into
`a new series of one or
`more numerical
`values and one or
`more attributes that
`reflects the operation
`
`
`
`’355 Patent - Term 5: Defendant disputes this term.
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘355 Patent at Col.
`4, lines 4 – 30;
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’355 Patent Claims
`1, 27, 28 and 54.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`1, 28
`
`generating at least
`one second title
`corresponding to
`results of the
`operation
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘355 Patent at Col.
`13, lines 4 – 20;
`col. 28, lines 57 –
`61; col. 36, lines 17
`– 33;
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Generating at least
`one second title based
`on the results of the
`operation and the tags
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’355 Patent: claims
`1, 28; at 56:42-47
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 6 of 75
`
`
`
`’355 Patent - Term 6: Defendant disputes this term.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`the step of
`receiving
`
`15 and 42
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Indefinite
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`Intrinsic Support
`
`‘355 Patent at
`Language of the
`claims; col. 49,
`lines 40 – 45;
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`Smith Declaration
`pars. 34 - 491
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`Not indefinite. In
`claim 15, the step
`referred to is
`“receiving a series of
`numerical values
`having tags indicating
`characteristics of the
`numerical values” in
`claim 1. In claim 42,
`the step referred to is
`“receiving a series of
`numerical values
`having tags indicating
`characteristics of the
`numerical values” in
`claim 28.
`
`Defendant Intrinsic
`and Extrinsic
`Support
`Intrinsic Support
`
`’355 Patent: Claims
`1, 15, 28, 42; at
`20:23-54; 50:2-5;
`50:35; 50-39-55;
`50:39-55.
`
`’748 Patent: col.
`97-col. 106; col.
`107-col. 112.
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`ECF 81-7 (“Martin
`Decl.”) at ¶¶ 41-46.
`
`
`
`’355 Patent -Term 7: Defendant disputes this term.
`
`
`1 e-Numerate contends that reference to extrinsic evidence by either party is inappropriate for all terms in dispute. Support from the
`Smith Declaration is cited only in the event that the Court considers extrinsic evidence.
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 7 of 75
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`report2
`
`’355 Patent:
`claim 21
`
`’383 Patent:
`claim 14
`
`’384 Patent:
`claim 66
`
`’748 Patent:
`claims 11, 19, 20
`
`’337 Patent:
`claim 1
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘355 Patent at Col.
`2, lines 35 – 41;
`col. 9, lines 36 –
`52; col. 12, lines
`4–- 11; col. 13,
`line 55 – col. 14,
`line 7; col. 16,
`lines 31 – 46;
`
`‘842 patent, claim
`29 (Government
`does not seek
`construction of
`“report”); ‘842
`patent claims 32
`and 33 (claim
`differentiation).
`
`‘383 Patent at Col.
`7, lines 44 – 47;
`
`‘384 Patent at Col.
`7, lines 37 – 40;
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Document generated
`by combining an
`XML-compliant
`document with a
`template.
`
`Defendant Intrinsic
`and Extrinsic
`Support
`’355 Patent at
`9:36-52; 12:4-7;
`16:31; 16:40-46.
`
`XML Bible3 at
`110, 132.
`
`’383 Patent at
`7:44-60, 10:11-14,
`14:36, 14:45-51.
`
`’384 Patent at
`7:37-53; 10:8-11;
`14:28; 14:37-43.
`
`’748 Patent at
`7:39-55, 10:7-10,
`14:31, 14:40-46.
`
`’337 Patent at
`7:49-65; 10:21-24;
`14:46; 14:55-61.
`
`
`2 The Government did not list this term with respect to the ‘842 Patent, but as indicated in its prior briefing seeks the same
`construction for this term in that patent based on the same disclosure. See ECF 90 at 10, n. 2. Intrinsic evidence within the ’842
`Patent includes U.S. Patent No. 6,920,608 at 9:48-64; 12:18-21; 16:46; 16:55-61; U.S. Patent No. 7,421,648 at 9:36-52; 12:4-7; 16:31;
`16:40-46. See also ECF 80 at 4.
`3 The XML Bible constitutes intrinsic evidence as it was incorporated by reference in the asserted patents and Defendant included
`relevant excerpts in its prior briefing. See ECF 82-1. Should the Court seek additional portions, Defendant will furnish them.
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 8 of 75
`
`
`‘748 Patent at Col.
`7, lines 39 - 42;
`
`‘337 Patent at Col.
`7, lines 49 – 52;
`
`
`
`B. ’816 Patent
`
`’816 Patent -Term 1: Plaintiff disputes this term.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`tags reflecting
`characteristics of the
`numerical values
`
`1, 10, 17, 26, 27
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`Markup language
`tags wherein the
`markup language
`tags for the one or
`more numerical
`values have more
`than one attribute
`that explains the
`meaning of the
`numerical values
`
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘816 Patent at
`Abstract, col. 4,
`lines 29 – 33; col.
`8, lines 41 – 43;
`col. 16, lines 55 –
`67; col. 17, line 54
`– col. 18, line 2;
`col. 20, lines 10 –
`57; claim 27
`(“characteristic”).
`
`Appendix B of
`‘383, ‘384, ’748
`and ‘337 patents
`via incorporation
`by reference;
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`(incorporating
`Defendant’s
`construction of
`“tag/tags”)
`Defendant maintains
`that “tag” should be
`construed as
`“markup language
`tag” and “tags” as
`“markup language
`tags.” Further, a
`markup language is
`“a language that
`uses tags to define
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’816 Patent at
`Abstract; 2:6-7;
`4:31-33; 8:41-43;
`15:43-46; 17:56-
`59; 20:24-57;
`21:22-25; 24:40-
`50; 25:25-28;
`25:30-33.
`
`’355 Patent at
`Abstract, 2:1-2,
`4:28-30, 8:38-40,
`15:43-46, 17:57-
`60, 20:23-59,
`21:31-33, 24:50-
`60, 25:34-37.
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 9 of 75
`
`
`
`elements within a
`document.
`Examples of markup
`languages include
`HTML, XML and
`XBRL.” To the
`extent this term is
`construed,
`Defendant proposes:
`“Markup language
`tags wherein the
`markup language
`tags for the one or
`more numerical
`values have one or
`more attributes that
`describe the
`meaning of the
`numerical values.”
`
`
`‘355 Patent at
`Abstract; Col. 4,
`lines 28 - 30; Col.
`8, lines 38 - 40;
`Figure 10, steps
`1010 and 1012;
`Figure 21 steps
`2106 and 2018;
`Col. 7, lines 7 –
`11; col. 7, lines
`42-44; Col. 16,
`lines 55 – 57;
`Figure 4 and Col.
`17, line 55 – col.
`18, line 3; col. 18,
`lines 22 – 25; col.
`18, lines 50 – 60;
`col. 19, lines 12 –
`14; col. 19, line 57
`– col. 20, line 1;
`col. 20, lines 11 –
`64; col. 24, lines
`50 – 60; col. 25,
`lines 34 – 37;
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 10 of 75
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘816 Patent at
`Abstract; col. 8,
`lines 28 – 43; col.
`26, lines 5 – 30;
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’816 Patent at
`20:28; 25:12-17;
`46:42-51.
`
`
`
`
`
`’816 Patent – Term 3: Plaintiff disputes this term.
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`One or more
`attributes for the
`numerical values in
`the first markup
`document are
`different from one
`or more attributes
`for the numerical
`values in the second
`markup document
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`1, 10, 17, 26, 27
`
`wherein the
`characteristics
`indicate that the
`numerical values of
`the first markup
`document differ in
`format from the
`numerical values of
`the second markup
`document
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’816 Patent – Term 4: Plaintiff disputes this term.
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 11 of 75
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’816 Patent:
`Claims 1, 10, 17,
`26 and 27.
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘816 Patent at
`Abstract; col. 4,
`lines 14 – 28; col.
`8, lines 28 – 43;
`col. 26, lines 5 –
`30;
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`1, 10, 17, 26 and
`27
`
`automatically
`transforming/transforms
`the numerical values of
`at least one of the first
`markup document and
`the second markup
`document, so that the
`numerical values of the
`first markup document
`and the second markup
`document have a
`common format
`
`
`
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`Automatically
`converting/converts
`at least a portion of
`the first or second
`numerical values and
`one or more
`attributes for the
`numerical values in
`the first or second
`markup document to
`create new numerical
`values and common
`attributes for the
`numerical values
`
`’816 Patent – Term 5: Defendant disputes this term.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`the markup
`language
`
`12
`
`
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Indefinite
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`Not indefinite.
`Antecedent basis is
`implied, inter alia,
`by the use of the
`term “markup
`document” in claim
`10.
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`Intrinsic Support
`
`‘816 Patent at
`Language of the
`involved claims;
`Abstract; col. 1,
`lines 39 – 43; col.
`3, line 65 – col. 4,
`
`11
`
`Defendant Intrinsic
`and Extrinsic
`Support
`Intrinsic Support
`
`’816 Patent:
`Claims 10, 12; 2:1-
`8; 3:65-4:6; 8:44-
`46; 20:33-37.
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 12 of 75
`
`line 6; col. 8, lines
`15 – 55.
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`Smith Dec. pars.
`40 – 47;
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`See construction
`column for
`support;
`
`
`Martin Decl. at ¶¶
`47-52.
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`See construction
`column for
`support.
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`In the interest of
`narrowing the issues
`before the Court,
`Defendant does not
`contest e-
`Numerate’s
`identification of
`function and
`structure for this
`term.
`
`Function: receiving
`a first markup
`document and a
`second markup
`document.
`
`
`
`’816 Patent – Term 64: Joint
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`26
`
`means for receiving
`a first markup
`document and a
`second
`markup document,
`both the first markup
`document and
`the second markup
`document containing
`numerical values
`and tags reflecting
`characteristics of the
`numerical
`values wherein the
`characteristics
`indicate that the
`
`
`4 This term is no longer in dispute.
`
`
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`To be construed
`under § 112 par. 6.
`
`Function: receiving
`a first markup
`document and a
`second markup
`document.
`
`Structure: Reader
`See, e.g., Fig. 7A
`box 704, Fig. 8, step
`802, col. 8, line 4;
`col. 19, lines 30 –
`48; col. 29, lines 35
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 13 of 75
`
`numerical values of
`the first markup
`document differ in
`format from the
`numerical values of
`the second markup
`document
`
`
`
`
`’816 Patent – Term 7: Joint
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`26
`
`means for
`automatically
`transforming the
`numerical values
`of at least one of the
`first markup
`document and the
`second markup
`document, so that
`the numerical values
`of the first markup
`document and the
`
`– 65; col. 30, lines
`37 – 45.
`
`
`Structure: Reader
`See, e.g., Fig. 7A
`box 704, Fig. 8, step
`802, col. 8, line 4;
`col. 19, lines 30 –
`48; col. 29, lines 35
`– 65; col. 30, lines
`37 – 45.
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`See construction
`column for
`support;5
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`To be construed
`under § 112 par. 6.
`
`Function:
`automatically
`transforming the
`numerical values
`of at least one of the
`first markup
`document and the
`second markup
`document.
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`To be construed
`under § 112 ¶6
`
`Function:
`Automatically
`transforming the
`numerical values of
`at least one of the
`first markup
`document and the
`second markup
`document, so that
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`Intrinsic Support
`
`’816 Patent: Claim
`26; Fig. 7A; 7:1-2;
`25:36-45; 25:63-
`64; 26:7-11;
`26:31-67; 27:1-45;
`31:31-55; 31:56-
`60; 32:21-29.
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`
`
`5 e-Numerate contends that the Government’s use of the Martin Declaration to opine on the construction of the “means-plus-function”
`terms in the ‘816 and ‘383 patents is inappropriate as is the Government’s reliance on the Martin Declaration to assert that the claims
`are indefinite for alleged failure to disclose an algorithm. e-Numerate refers the Court to its briefing on this issue.
`
`
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 14 of 75
`
`Martin Decl. at ¶¶
`68, 69, 72, 74-76,
`78,82.
`
`the numerical values
`of the first markup
`document and the
`second markup
`document have a
`common format.
`
`Structure:
`Undisclosed
`
`Term is indefinite
`
`
`Structure: X-value
`transformer
`employing
`conversion factors.
`Fig. 7A block 710;
`Figure 8 block 808;
`Figure 10, blocks
`1012 and 1014;
`Figure 11; col. 19,
`line 49 – col. 20,
`line 3; col. 23, lines
`47 – 59; col. 30, line
`46 - col. 33, line 33;
`col. 25, line 45 –
`col. 27, line 45.
`
`
`
`second markup
`document have a
`common format
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’816 Patent – Term 8: Joint
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 15 of 75
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`See construction
`column for
`support;
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`To be construed
`under § 112 ¶6
`
`Function:
`combining the first
`markup document
`and the second
`markup document
`into a single data.6
`
`Structure:
`Undisclosed
`
`Term is indefinite
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`Intrinsic Support
`
`’816 Patent: Claim
`26; 33:26-33;
`33:39-41; Table 2
`at col. 34.
`
`
`Extrinsic Support
`
`Martin Decl. at ¶¶
`87-93.
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`To be construed
`under § 112 par. 6.
`
`Function:
`combining the first
`markup document
`and the second
`markup document.
`
`Structure: primary
`data store; Fig. 7,
`Box 712; Figure 8,
`line 810; Fig; 11;
`Figure 13; col. 19,
`line 66 – col. 20,
`line 3; col. 31, lines
`4 – 30; col. 33, lines
`9 – 59; col. 35, line
`50 – col. 36, line 40.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`26
`
`means for
`combining the first
`markup document
`and the
`second markup
`document into a
`single data
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’816 Patent – Term 97: Joint
`
`
`6 As noted in Defendant’s prior briefing, “Defendant had previously mistakenly stated that the function was indefinite. However, it previously disclosed this
`function in its expert declaration.” ECF 83 at 18, n. 5 (citations omitted).
`7 This term is no longer in dispute.
`
`
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 16 of 75
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`means for
`displaying the
`single data set
`
`26
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`See construction
`column for
`support;
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`To be construed
`under § 112 par. 6.
`
`Function:
`displaying the single
`data set
`
`Structure: graphical
`user interface.
`Fig. 7A block 734;
`Figures 15 A, B &
`C; Fig. 19 B; col.
`35, line 50 – 63; col.
`36, line 66 – col. 37,
`line 45; col. 48,
`lines 41 – 49; col.
`53, lines 44 – 53.
`
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`See construction
`column for
`support.
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`In the interest of
`narrowing the issues
`before the Court,
`Defendant does not
`contest e-
`Numerate’s
`identification of
`function and
`structure for this
`term.
`
`To be construed
`under § 112 par. 6.
`
`Function:
`displaying the single
`data set
`
`Structure: graphical
`user interface.
`Fig. 7A block 734;
`Figures 15 A, B &
`C; Fig. 19 B; col.
`35, line 50 – 63; col.
`36, line 66 – col. 37,
`line 45; col. 48,
`lines 41 – 49; col.
`53, lines 44 – 53.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 17 of 75
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’816 Patent at
`Abstract, 4:31-33;
`8:41-43; 10:7-10;
`24:40-50.
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘816 Patent at
`Language of the
`claims; Abstract,
`col. 4, lines 29 –
`33; col. 8, lines 41
`– 43; col. 16, lines
`55 – 67; col. 20,
`lines 10 – 57.
`
`Appendix B of
`‘383, ‘384, ’748
`and ‘337 patents
`via incorporation
`by reference;
`
`’816 Patent – Term 10: Plaintiff disputes this term.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`characteristic of the
`numerical value
`
`27
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`An attribute that
`explains the
`meaning of the
`numerical value
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C. ’383 Patent
`
`’383 Patent – Term 1: Plaintiff disputes this term.
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 18 of 75
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`1, 17, 18
`
`first tags reflecting
`characteristics of the
`first numerical
`values
`
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`Markup language
`tags wherein the
`markup language
`tags for the one or
`more numerical
`values have more
`than one attribute
`that explains the
`meaning of the
`numerical values
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘383 Patent at Col.
`2, lines 20 – 23;
`col. 2, lines 54 –
`56; Col. 3, lines 49
`- 51; Col. 6, lines
`46 – 48; col. 15,
`line 59 – col. 16,
`line 7 & Figure 4;
`col. 18, line 42 –
`col. 19, line 18;
`col. 19, lines 25 –
`35; col. 23, lines
`21 – 60; Figure 10,
`steps 1010 and
`1012; Figure 21
`steps 2106 and
`2018; Appendix A
`and Appendix B
`
`‘816 Patent at
`Abstract, col. 4,
`lines 29 – 33; col.
`8, lines 41 – 43;
`col. 16, lines 55 –
`67; col. 17, line 54
`– col. 18, line 2;
`col. 20, lines 10 –
`57; claim 27
`(“characteristic”).
`
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`(incorporating
`Defendant’s
`construction of
`“tag”/”tags”).
`Defendant maintains
`that ”tag” should be
`construed as
`“markup language
`tag” and “tags”
`should be construed
`as “markup
`language tags.”
`Further, a markup
`language is “a
`language that uses
`tags to define
`elements within a
`document.
`Examples of markup
`languages include
`HTML, XML and
`XBRL.” To the
`extent the Court
`construes the entire
`term, Defendant
`proposes “Markup
`language tags
`wherein the markup
`language tags for the
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’383 Patent at
`Abstract, 3:49:51,
`6:46-48, 7:13-14,
`13:47-50,
`15:61:64, 18:48-
`19:13, 19:51-52,
`23:9-20, 23:62-65.
`
`’355 Patent at
`Abstract, 1:65-66,
`2:1-2, 4:28-30,
`8:38-40, 9:5-6,
`15:43-46, 17:57-
`60, 20:23-59,
`21:31-33, 24:50-
`60, 25:34-37.
`
`
`’816 Patent at
`Abstract; 2:1-4,
`4:31-33; 8:42-43,
`9:8-9, 15:43-46;
`21:22-25; 20:24-
`57; 17:56-59;
`24:40-50, 25:30-
`33; 25:25-28.
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 19 of 75
`
`one or more
`numerical values
`have one or more
`attributes that
`describe the
`meaning of the
`numerical values.”
`
`Appendix B of
`‘383, ‘384, ’748
`and ‘337 patents
`via incorporation
`by reference;
`
`‘355 Patent at
`Abstract; Col. 4,
`lines 28 - 30; Col.
`8, lines 38 - 40;
`Figure 10, steps
`1010 and 1012;
`Figure 21 steps
`2106 and 2018;
`Col. 7, lines 7 –
`11; col. 7, lines
`42-44; Col. 16,
`lines 55 – 57;
`Figure 4 and Col.
`17, line 55 – col.
`18, line 3; col. 18,
`lines 22 – 25; col.
`18, lines 50 – 60;
`col. 19, lines 12 –
`14; col. 19, line 57
`– col. 20, line 1;
`col. 20, lines 11 –
`64; col. 24, lines
`50 – 60; col. 25,
`lines 34 – 37;
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 20 of 75
`
`’383 Patent – Term 2: Plaintiff disputes this term.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`1, 17, 18
`
`second tags
`reflecting
`characteristics of the
`second numerical
`values
`
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`Markup language
`tags wherein the
`markup language
`tags for the one or
`more numerical
`values have more
`than one attribute
`that explains the
`meaning of the
`numerical values
`
`
`
`20
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘383 Patent at Col.
`2, lines 20 – 23;
`col. 2, lines 54 –
`56; Col. 3, lines 49
`- 51; Col. 6, lines
`46 – 48; col. 15,
`line 59 – col. 16,
`line 7 & Figure 4;
`col. 18, line 42 –
`col. 19, line 18;
`col. 19, lines 25 –
`35; col. 23, lines
`21 – 60; Figure 10,
`steps 1010 and
`1012; Figure 21
`steps 2106 and
`2018; Appendix A
`and Appendix B
`
`‘816 Patent at
`Abstract, col. 4,
`lines 29 – 33; col.
`8, lines 41 – 43;
`col. 16, lines 55 –
`67; col. 17, line 54
`– col. 18, line 2;
`col. 20, lines 10 –
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`(incorporating
`Defendant’s
`construction of “tag”
`and “tags”)
`Defendant maintains
`that “tag” should be
`construed as
`“markup language
`tag” and “tags” as
`“markup language
`tags.” Further, a
`markup language is
`“a language that
`uses tags to define
`elements within a
`document.
`Examples of markup
`languages include
`HTML, XML and
`XBRL.” To the
`extent the Court
`construes the entire
`term, Defendant
`proposes “Markup
`language tags
`wherein the markup
`language tags for the
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’383 Patent at
`Abstract, 3:49:51,
`6:46-48, 7:13-14,
`13:47-50,
`15:61:64, 18:48-
`19:13, 19:51-52,
`23:9-20, 23:62-65.
`
`’355 Patent at
`Abstract, 1:65-66,
`2:1-2, 4:28-30,
`8:38-40, 9:5-6,
`15:43-46, 17:57-
`60, 20:23-59,
`21:31-33, 24:50-
`60, 25:34-37.
`
`’816 Patent at
`Abstract; 2:1-4,
`4:31-33; 8:42-43,
`9:8-9, 15:43-46;
`21:22-25; 20:24-
`57; 17:56-59;
`24:40-50, 25:30-
`33; 25:25-28.
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 21 of 75
`
`one or more
`numerical values
`have one or more
`attributes that
`describe the
`meaning of the
`numerical values.”
`
`57; claim 27
`(“characteristic”).
`
`Appendix B of
`‘383, ‘384, ’748
`and ‘337 patents
`via incorporation
`by reference;
`
`‘355 Patent at
`Abstract; Col. 4,
`lines 28 - 30; Col.
`8, lines 38 - 40;
`Figure 10, steps
`1010 and 1012;
`Figure 21 steps
`2106 and 2018;
`Col. 7, lines 7 –
`11; col. 7, lines
`42-44; Col. 16,
`lines 55 – 57;
`Figure 4 and Col.
`17, line 55 – col.
`18, line 3; col. 18,
`lines 22 – 25; col.
`18, lines 50 – 60;
`col. 19, lines 12 –
`14; col. 19, line 57
`– col. 20, line 1;
`col. 20, lines 11 –
`64; col. 24, lines
`50 – 60; col. 25,
`lines 34 – 37;
`
`
`
`21
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 22 of 75
`
`
`
`
`
`’383 Patent – Term 4: Plaintiff disputes this term.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`1, 17, 18
`
`wherein the first tags
`and the second tags
`each include
`computer-readable
`semantic tags that
`describe a semantic
`meaning of a
`corresponding one
`of at least one of the
`first numerical
`values or the second
`numerical values
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`Markup language
`tags wherein the
`markup language
`tags for the one or
`more numerical
`values have more
`than one attribute
`that explains the
`meaning of the
`numerical values
`
`
`
`22
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘383 Patent at Col.
`2, lines 20 – 23;
`col. 2, lines 54 –
`56; Col. 3, lines 49
`- 51; Col. 6, lines
`46 – 48; col. 15,
`line 59 – col. 16,
`line 7 & Figure 4;
`col. 18, line 42 –
`col. 19, line 18;
`col. 19, lines 25 –
`35; col. 23, lines
`21 – 60; Figure 10,
`steps 1010 and
`1012; Figure 21
`steps 2106 and
`2018; Appendix A
`and Appendix B
`
`‘816 Patent at
`Abstract, col. 4,
`lines 29 – 33; col.
`8, lines 41 – 43;
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`Plain and ordinary
`(incorporating
`Defendant’s
`constructions of
`“tag/tags” and
`“semantic
`tag/semantic tags”)
`Defendant maintains
`that “tag[s]” and
`“semantic tag[s]”
`should be construed.
`To the extent the
`Court construes the
`term as a whole,
`Defendant proposes
`“Markup language
`tags wherein the
`markup language
`tags for the one or
`more numerical
`values have one or
`more attributes that
`describe the
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’383 Patent at
`Abstract, 3:49:51,
`6:46-48, 7:13-14,
`13:47-50,
`15:61:64, 18:48-
`19:13, 19:51-52,
`23:9-20, 23:62-65.
`
`’355 Patent at
`Abstract, 1:65-66,
`2:1-2, 4:28-30,
`8:38-40, 9:5-6,
`15:43-46, 17:57-
`60, 20:23-59,
`21:31-33, 24:50-
`60, 25:34-37.
`
`’816 Patent at
`Abstract; 2:1-4,
`4:31-33; 8:42-43,
`9:8-9, 15:43-46;
`21:22-25; 20:24-
`57; 17:56-59;
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 23 of 75
`
`meaning of the
`numerical values.”
`
`
`
`24:40-50, 25:30-
`33; 25:25-28.
`
`col. 16, lines 55 –
`67; col. 17, line 54
`– col. 18, line 2;
`col. 20, lines 10 –
`57; claim 27
`(“characteristic”).
`
`Appendix B of
`‘383, ‘384, ’748
`and ‘337 patents
`via incorporation
`by reference;
`
`‘355 Patent at
`Abstract; Col. 4,
`lines 28 - 30; Col.
`8, lines 38 - 40;
`Figure 10, steps
`1010 and 1012;
`Figure 21 steps
`2106 and 2018;
`Col. 7, lines 7 –
`11; col. 7, lines
`42-44; Col. 16,
`lines 55 – 57;
`Figure 4 and Col.
`17, line 55 – col.
`18, line 3; col. 18,
`lines 22 – 25; col.
`18, lines 50 – 60;
`col. 19, lines 12 –
`14; col. 19, line 57
`– col. 20, line 1;
`
`
`
`23
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 24 of 75
`
`col. 20, lines 11 –
`64; col. 24, lines
`50 – 60; col. 25,
`lines 34 – 37;
`
`
`
`
`’383 Patent – Term 5: Defendant disputes this term.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Claims
`
`semantic
`tag/semantic tags
`
`’383 Patent:
`claims 1, 6-8, 11,
`12, 15, 17 and 18.
`
`’384 Patent:
`claim 66
`
`’748 Patent:
`claims 1 – 5, 11, 14
`– 16, 19, 20
`
`’842 Patent:
`claim 29
`
`’337 Patent:
`claim 1
`
`e-Numerate
`Construction
`
`“Semantic tag”
`should not be
`construed as a stand-
`alone term because
`e-Numerate has
`identified a phrase
`for construction. In
`addition, the claim
`language uses the
`term “semantic
`tags” in the plural.
`To the extent
`“semantic tags” is
`construed, e-
`Numerate contends
`that the term
`“semantic tags”
`should be construed
`as “markup
`language tags
`
`24
`
`e-Numerate
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`‘383 Patent at Col.
`2, lines 20 – 23;
`col. 2, lines 54 –
`56; Col. 3, lines 49
`- 51; Col. 6, lines
`46 – 48; col. 15,
`line 59 – col. 16,
`line 7 & Figure 4;
`col. 18, line 42 –
`col. 19, line 18;
`col. 19, lines 25 –
`35; col. 23, lines
`21 – 60; Figure 10,
`steps 1010 and
`1012; Figure 21
`steps 2106 and
`2018; Appendix A
`and Appendix B
`
`
`Defendant
`Construction
`
`A “semantic tag”
`should be construed
`as “markup
`language tag with
`one or more
`attributes that
`describe the
`meaning of the
`tagged value(s).”
`and “semantic tags”
`should be construed
`as “Markup
`language tags with
`one or more
`attributes that
`describe the
`meaning of the
`tagged value(s).”
`
`Defendant
`Intrinsic and
`Extrinsic Support
`’383 Patent at
`Abstract, 3:49:51,
`6:46-48, 7:13-14,
`13:47-50,
`15:61:64, 18:48-
`19:13, 19:51-52,
`23:9-20, 23:62-65.
`’355 Patent at
`Abstract, 1:65-66,
`2:1-2, 4:28-30,
`8:38-40, 9:5-6,
`15:43-46, 17:57-
`60, 20:23-59,
`21:31-33, 24:50-
`60, 25:34-37.
`
`’816 Patent at
`Abstract; 2:1-4,
`24:40-50; 4:31-33;
`9:8-9, 15:43-46;
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00859-RTH Document 102-1 Filed 10/20/22 Page 25 of 75
`
`wherein the markup
`language tags for the
`one or more
`numerical values
`have more than one
`attribute that
`explains the
`meaning of the
`numerical values.”
`
`The term “semantic-
`tag” should not be
`construed as a stand-
`alone term because
`the claim language
`uses “semantic
`tags”. e-Numerate
`has identified a
`phrase in claim 66
`that should be
`construed and has
`provided a
`construction
`therefore. To the
`extent “semantic
`tags” is construed as
`markup language
`tags for one or more
`values that have
`more than one
`attribute that
`explains the
`
`‘816 Patent at
`Abstract, col. 4,
`lines 29 – 33; col.
`8, lines 41 – 43;
`col. 16, lines 55 –
`67; col. 17, line 54
`– col. 18, line 2;
`col. 20, lines 10 –
`57; claim 27
`(“characteristic”).
`
`Appendix B of
`‘383, ‘384, ’748
`and ‘337 patents
`via incorporation
`by reference;
`
`‘355 Patent at
`Abstract; Col. 4,
`lines 28 - 30; Col.
`8, lines 38 - 40;
`Figure 10, steps
`1010 and 1012;
`Figure 21 steps
`2106 and 2018;
`Col. 7, lines 7 –
`11; col. 7, lines
`42-44; Col. 16,
`lines 55 – 57;
`Figure 4 and Col.
`17, line 55 – col.
`18, line 3; col. 18,
`lines 22 – 25; col.
`
`25
`
`21:22-25; 20:24-
`57; 17:56-59;
`8:42-43; 25:30-33;
`25:25-28.
`
`’384 Patent at
`Abstract; 3:36-3