throbber
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
`COUNTY O F L OS ANGELES
`COURTHOUSE ADDRESS:
`
`R e s e r v e d f o r C l e r k ’ s F i l e S t a m p
`
`PLAINTIFF(S):
`
`DEFENDANT(S):
`
`NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT – LIMITED CIVIL CASE
`
`CASE NUMBER:
`
`Case is assigned for all purposes to the judicial officer indicated below. Notice given to Plaintiff / Cross-Complainant /
`Attorney of Record on ____________________.
`
`ASSIGNED JUDGE
`
`DEPARTMENT
`
`ROOM
`
`By ____________________________, Deputy Clerk
`
`Instructions for Handling Limited Civil Cases
`
`The following critical provisions, as applicable in the Los Angeles Superior Court are cited for your information.
`PRIORITY OVER OTHER RULES: The priority of Chapter Seven of the LASC Local Rules over other inconsistent
`Local Rules is set forth in Rule 7.2© thereof.
`CHALLENGE TO ASSIGNED JUDGE: To the extent set forth therein, Government Code section 68616(i) and Local
`Rule 2.5 control the timing of Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 challenges.
`TIME STANDARDS: The time standards may be extended by the court only upon a showing of good cause.
`(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.110.) Failure to meet time standards may result in the imposition of sanctions.
`(Local Rule 3.37.)
`Except for collections cases pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.740, cases assigned to the Individual
`Calendar Court will be subject to processing under the following time standards:
`COMPLAINTS: All complaints shall be served and the proof of service filed within 60 days after filing of the complaint.
`CROSS-COMPLAINTS: Without leave of court first being obtained, no cross-complaint may be filed by any party after
`their answer is filed. Cross-complaints against parties new to the action must be served and the proof of service filed
`within 30 days after the filing of the cross-complaint. A cross-complaint against a party who has already appeared in
`the action must be accompanied by proof of service of the cross-complaint at the time it is filed. (Code Civ. Proc., §
`428.50.)
`DEFAULTS (Local Rule 9.10): If a responsive pleading is not served within the time to respond and no extension of
`time has been granted, the plaintiff must file a Request for Entry of Default within 10 days after the time for service has
`elapsed. Failure to timely file the Request for Entry of Default may result in an Order to Show Cause being issued as
`to why sanctions should not be imposed. The plaintiff must request default judgment on the defaulting defendants
`within 40 days after entry of default.
`NOTICED MOTIONS: All regularly noticed motions will be calendared through the assigned department. Each motion
`date must be separately reserved and filed with appropriate fees for each motion. Motions for Summary Judgment
`must be identified at the time of reservations. All motions should be filed in the clerk’s office.
`EX PARTE MATTERS: All ex parte applications should be noticed for the courtroom.
`UNINSURED MOTORISTS CLAIMS: Delay Reduction Rules do not apply to uninsured motorist claims. The plaintiff
`must file a Notice of Designation with the Court identifying the case as an uninsured motorist claim under Insurance
`Code section 11580.2.
`
`LACIV ____ 001 (Rev. [03/17)
`LASC Approved 09-04
`
`NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT – LIMITED CIVIL CASE
`
`312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
`
`Jeff Fitzpatrick
`
`Panasonic Corporation
`
`22STLC00374
`
`01/19/2022
`
`Katherine Chilton
`
`25
`
`R. Perez
`
`Spring Street Courthouse
`
`Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer / Clerk of Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket