`Civil Division
`North Central District, Glendale Courthouse, Department E
`
`19GDCV01090
`STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY vs
`ROBERT AMSES, et al.
`
`January 5, 2022
`11:00 AM
`
`Judge: Honorable David A. Rosen
`Judicial Assistant: D. Abbatecola
`Courtroom Assistant: V. Flores
`
`CSR: None
`ERM: None
`Deputy Sheriff: None
`
`APPEARANCES:
`For Plaintiff(s): Michael Long appearing for Brian Samuel Letofsky via LA Court Connect
`For Defendant(s): Susan Rousier appearing for Paul Sullivan via LA Court Connect
`
`
`NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Ex-Parte Proceedings
`
`The matter is not called for hearing.
`
`The Court finds notice for today's Ex Parte Application is proper. There is no written opposition
`on file with the court.
`
`The Ex Parte Application Ex Parte Application for relief from mistaken dismissal of cross-
`complaint in its entirety with prejudice; req dismissal of cross-complaint as to Panasonic only
`and filing ROE Amendment; or, alternative, shorten time for noticed motion filed by Harriet
`Howe, Robert Amses on 01/04/2022 is Granted.
`
`Dismissal of Cross-Complaint in it's entirety, entered on 12/15/2021 is vacated, except that
`dismissal of Defendant's Cross-Complaint as to Cross-Defendant PANASONIC
`CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, remains in full force and effect. Cross-Defendant's
`proposed ROE Amendment dated 12/20/2021 is deemed approved and filed, naming TCL
`Communications Technology Holdings Limited as Cross-Defendant's ROE 1.
`
`This ruling is pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 473(b).
`
`Counsel for Defendant to give notice.
`
`Minute Order
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
