throbber
Case 3:23-cv-01200-H-DEB Document 33 Filed 02/26/24 PageID.617 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Gregory P. Olson, State Bar No. 177942
`LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY P. OLSON
`501 W. Broadway, Ste. 1370
`San Diego, California 92101
`Telephone: (619) 564-3650
`Email: greg@olsonesq.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Torrey Pines Logic, Inc.,
`Luong Hin, Michael Dellosa, Sophia Smith,
`Shaun Ferguson, and Leonid Boris Volfson
`
`
`
`DASSAULT SYSTEMES
`SOLIDWORKS CORPORATION,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TORREY PINES LOGIC, INC., LUONG
`HIN; MICHAEL DELLOSA; SOPHIA
`SMITH, SHAUN FERGUSON, LEONID
`BORIS VOLFSON,
`
`Defendants.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
` Case No. 3:23-cv-01200-H-DEB
`
`DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO
`PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
`LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND
`AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`Complaint Filed: June 28, 2023
`Amended Complaint Filed: August 25,
`2023
`
`DATE:
`TIME:
`DEPT.:
`
`
`
`
`
`March 11, 2024
`10:30 AM.
`12a
`
`Plaintiff Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corporation (“Plaintiff”) filed its
`Amended Complaint on August 25, 2023. (Doc. No. 9.) The Amended Complaint
`added two new defendants: Sean Ferguson (“Ferguson”) and Leonid Boris Volfson
`(“Volfson”). Defendants, including Volfson and Ferguson, filed an Answer to the
`Amended Complaint, asserting specific denials and affirmative defenses. (Doc. No.
`17.) Defendants have denied all copyright infringement of the SolidWorks software.
`
`1
`DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
`FILE SAC
`
` Case No. 3:23-cv-01200-H-DEB
`
`

`

`Case 3:23-cv-01200-H-DEB Document 33 Filed 02/26/24 PageID.618 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`The Scheduling Order Regulating Discovery and Other Pretrial Proceedings
`
`was entered on December 7, 2023. (Doc. No. 25.)
`The parties are currently engaged in extensive discovery. Defendants’
`discovery includes seeking files and documents regarding Plaintiff’s so-called
`“monitoring technology.” This monitoring technology is the cornerstone of Plaintiff’s
`Amended Complaint and now its Second Amended Complaint. See e.g., Second
`Amended Complaint, paragraphs 26, 27, 42, 43, 44, 50, 54, 56, 58, 64, 65, 67, 69, 70,
`76, 78, 84, 88, 95, 98, 100, 101, 102, 110, 111, 112, 115, 119, 131, 132 and others.
`Defendants have requested that the monitoring technology be produced to Defendants
`and all reports and data pertaining to the allegations of the Amended Complaint.
`Defendants contend this discovery is critical to its defenses and will confirm errors
`and false information in specific allegations Plaintiff made to support its claims for
`copyright infringement. To date, Plaintiff has failed to produce the monitoring
`technology and associated reports and data. Defendants will continue to seek the
`reports and data through discovery. The parties have a further status conference
`scheduled for April 5, 2024, before Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher. (Doc. No.
`30.)
`
`Plaintiff now seeks to add two new parties as defendants: Premier Optical
`Technologies LLC and Christopher Thomas. Defendants recognize the great liberality
`applied in connection with allowing leave to amend pleadings under Rule 15(a) of the
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff’s motion for
`leave but reserve all rights to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the Second
`Amended Complaint as appropriate and to continue to engage in discovery, including
`without limitation, discovery regarding Plaintiffs’ monitoring technology and the
`alleged basis for all of Plaintiff’s claims.
`///
`///
`///
`
`2
`DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
`TO FILE SAC
`
`Case No. 3:23-cv-01200-H-DEB
`
`

`

`Case 3:23-cv-01200-H-DEB Document 33 Filed 02/26/24 PageID.619 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`Dated: February 26, 2024
`
`LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY P. OLSON
`
`By: s/ Gregory P. Olson
`
`GREGORY P. OLSON
`
`Attorney for Defendants Torrey Pines
`
`Logic, Inc., Leonid Boris Volfson,
`
`Luong Hin, Michael Dellosa,
`
`Sophia Smith, and Shuan Ferguson
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`3
`DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
`TO FILE SAC
`
`Case No. 3:23-cv-01200-H-DEB
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket