`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 56 Filed 11/23/21 PageID.1009 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`TACTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No.: 21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB
`
`ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
`MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
`UNDER SEAL
`
`[ECF No. 50]
`
`
`
`Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to File Documents Under Seal. (ECF No. 50.)
`
`Plaintiff seeks to redact information from its Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Compel
`
`and attached exhibit. (ECF Nos. 50; 52.) Plaintiff seeks to redact this information because
`
`(1) it has been designated as “Confidential – For Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the
`
`protective order, and (2) it contains “sensitive” and “confidential business information.”
`
`(ECF No. 50 at 2.) Plaintiff filed the proposed document and exhibit under seal in
`
`unredacted form and publicly filed the documents in redacted form. (ECF Nos. 51; 52.)
`
`
`
`Plaintiff has demonstrated good cause to make narrowly tailored redactions of its
`
`business information from its opposition and exhibit to Defendant’s Motion to Compel.
`
`See Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006).
`
`Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No. 50) is GRANTED. The Court DIRECTS the
`
`1
`
`21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB
`
`
`
`Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 56 Filed 11/23/21 PageID.1010 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`Clerk of Court to file Plaintiff’s unredacted opposition and exhibit (ECF No. 51) UNDER
`
`SEAL.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: November 23, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`2
`
`21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
