throbber
Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 299 Filed 05/20/23 PageID.13220 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`Roger A. Denning (SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Christopher S. Marchese (SBN 170239)
`marchese@fr.com
`Seth M. Sproul (SBN 217711)
`sproul@fr.com
`John W. Thornburgh (SBN 154627)
`thornburgh@fr.com
`Ryan P. O’Connor (SBN 253596)
`oconnor@fr.com
`Daniela Glaser (SBN 341535)
`glaser@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel: (858) 678-5070
`Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Additional Counsel listed on Signature
`Page
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`TACTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`
`
`
`
`
` Defendant.
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB
`
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S
`NOTICE OF AMENDED MOTION
`FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
`DAUBERT MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`OPINIONS OF PLAINTIFF’S
`EXPERTS JAMES H. OLIVER, PH.D.
`AND PATRICK F. KENNEDY, PH.D.,
`AND MOTION TO STRIKE
`
`
`Hearing Date:
`Hearing Time:
`Courtroom:
`Judge:
`
`
`
`July 13, 2023
`1:30 p.m.
`3A
`Hon. Todd W.
`Robinson
`
`Case No. 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 299 Filed 05/20/23 PageID.13221 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`TO PLAINTIFF AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on July 13, 2023 at 1:30 p.m., or as soon
`
`thereafter may be heard in the United States District Court, Southern District of
`
`California, located at Edward J. Schwartz United States Courthouse, 221 West
`
`Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101, Courtroom 3A, before the Honorable Todd W.
`
`Robinson, Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) will move, and hereby does move, for:
`
`A.
`
`Summary judgment on the following issues:
`
`(1) Apple Accused Products do not infringe U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`10,820,117 and 10,659,885
`
`(2) Apple’s Monolithic Magnet Accused Products do not infringe
`
`10,820,117 and 10,659,885
`
`(3) Taction is not entitled to pre-suit damages under 35 U.S.C. § 287.
`
`B. An order striking the testimony of Plaintiff Taction’s technical expert,
`
`Dr. James Oliver, as well as the entirety of the opinions and testimony of Plaintiff
`
`Taction’s damages expert, Dr. Patrick Kennedy.
`
`This motion is made pursuant to Federal R. Civ. P. 56, Federal Rule of
`
`Evidence 702, the Court’s Scheduling Order, and the Local Rules applicable thereto.
`
`This motion is based on this notice of motion and motion, the accompanying
`
`memorandum of points and authorities, the declaration of Seth M. Sproul in support
`
`of the motion, the pleadings on file in this action, and on such other written or oral
`
`argument or evidence as may be presented at or before the time this motion is taken
`
`under submission.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S NOTICE OF AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY
`JUDGMENT AND DAUBERT MOT. TO EXCL. OLIVER AND KENNEDY OPINIONS
`Case No. 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 299 Filed 05/20/23 PageID.13222 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`Dated: May 19, 2023
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`By: /s/ Seth M. Sproul
`
`Roger A. Denning (SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Christopher S. Marchese (SBN 170239)
`marchese@fr.com
`Seth M. Sproul (SBN 217711)
`sproul@fr.com
`John W. Thornburgh (SBN 154627)
`thornburgh@fr.com
`Ryan P. O’Connor (SBN 253596)
`oconnor@fr.com
`Daniela Glaser (SBN 341535)
`glaser@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel: (858) 678-5070
`Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Joy B. Kete (pro hac vice)
`kete@fr.com
`Qiuyi Wu (pro hac vice)
`qwu@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Tel: 516-542-5070/Fax 617-542-8906
`
`Jacqueline Tio (pro hac vice)
`tio@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1180 Peachtree Street, N.E., 21st Floor
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Tel: 404-892-5005/Fax 404-892-5005
`
`Counsel for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`2
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S NOTICE OF AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY
`JUDGMENT AND DAUBERT MOT. TO EXCL. OLIVER AND KENNEDY OPINIONS
`Case No. 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 299 Filed 05/20/23 PageID.13223 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
`REGARDING CONFERENCE OF COUNSEL
`
`Pursuant to Judge Todd W. Robinson’s Standing Order for Civil Cases, counsel
`
`for the parties met and conferred telephonically on May 19, 2023. Gavin Snyder
`
`attended for Plaintiff. Seth Sproul attended for Defendant. The parties discussed their
`
`positions on this motion. The discussions conclusively ended in an impasse, leaving
`
`an open issue for the court to resolve. Plaintiff indicated that it opposes this motion.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 19, 2023
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Seth M. Sproul
`
`Seth M. Sproul
`
`
`1
`DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S NOTICE OF AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY
`JUDGMENT AND DAUBERT MOT. TO EXCL. OLIVER AND KENNEDY OPINIONS
`Case No. 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket