throbber
Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 125 Filed 09/13/22 PageID.3734 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sean Pak (SBN 219032)
`seanpak@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 875-6320
`Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
`
`Thomas D. Pease (pro hac vice)
`(N.Y. Bar No. 2671741)
`thomaspease@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`Telephone: (212) 849-7000
`Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Taction Technology, Inc.
`
`Christopher S. Marchese (SBN
`170239)
`marchese@fr.com
`Seth M. Sproul (SBN 217711)
`sproul@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel: (858) 678-5070
`Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Joy B. Kete (pro hac vice)
`kete@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park
`Boston, MA 02210
`Tel: 617-542-5070 / Fax: 617-542-8906
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`18
`
`19
`
`17
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`20
`
`
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`TACTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`Defendant
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
` Case No. 21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB
`____________________
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR
`APPROVAL OF FIRST
`AMENDMENT TO THE
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Judge: Hon. Todd W. Robinson
`
`Magistrate Judge: Hon Jill L.
`Burkhardt
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 125 Filed 09/13/22 PageID.3735 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`Plaintiff Taction Technology, Inc. and Defendant Apple Inc. hereby jointly
`
`2
`
`move for entry of a first amendment to the Protective Order (Dkt. 41) regarding the
`
`3
`
`disclosure and use of discovery materials. The proposed amendment to the protective
`
`4
`
`order is attached to this joint motion (in PDF format) and is also being lodged (in
`
`5
`
`Word format). The Parties agree to the terms and limitations in the attached proposed
`
`6
`
`First Amendment to the Protective Order Regarding the Disclosure and Use of
`
`7
`
`Discovery Materials and request that the Court enter the proposed order.
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-1-
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 125 Filed 09/13/22 PageID.3736 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 13, 2022
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`By: /s/ Joy B. Kete
`
`Christopher S. Marchese (SBN 170239)
`marchese@fr.com
`Seth M. Sproul (SBN 217711)
`sproul@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel: (858) 678-5070 / Fax: (858) 678-
`5099
`
`Joy B. Kete (pro hac vice)
`kete@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park
`Boston, MA 02210
`Tel: 617-542-5070 / Fax: 617-542-8906
`
`Counsel for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`
`Dated: September 13, 2022
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`By: /s/ Sean Pak
`
`Sean Pak (SBN 219032)
`seanpak@quinneemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 875-6320
`Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
`
`Thomas D. Pease (pro hac vice)
`(N.Y. Bar No. 2671741)
`thomaspease@quinnemanuel.com
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 125 Filed 09/13/22 PageID.3737 Page 4 of 5
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`Telephone: (212) 849-7000
`Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
`
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Taction Technology,
`Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB Document 125 Filed 09/13/22 PageID.3738 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and
`
`3
`
`foregoing document has been served on September 13, 2022, to all counsel of record
`
`4
`
`who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF
`
`5
`
`system per Civil Local Rule 5.4. Any other counsel of record will be served by
`
`6
`
`electronic mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Sean Pak
`
`Sean Pak
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket