throbber
Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34466 Page 1 of 11
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI P.C.
`MORRIS FODEMAN (pro hac vice)
`mfodeman@wsgr.com
`WENDY L. DEVINE (SBN 246337)
`wdevine@wsgr.com
`NATALIE J. MORGAN (SBN 211143)
`nmorgan@wsgr.com
`12235 El Camino Real
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 350-2300
`
`HILGERS GRABEN PLLC
`MICHAEL T. HILGERS (pro hac vice)
`mhilgers@hilgersgraben.com
`575 Fallbrook Blvd, Suite 202
`Lincoln, NE 68521
`(402) 218-2106
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff NuVasive, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN DIEGO DIVISION
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28 PARTIES’ AGREED PROPOSED VERDICT
`FORM
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`PARTIES’ AGREED PROPOSED
`VERDICT FORM
`
`))))))))))))))
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`NUVASIVE, INC., a Delaware
`corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., a
`Delaware corporation, and ALPHATEC
`SPINE, INC., a California corporation,
`Defendants.
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34467 Page 2 of 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`ADDITIONAL COUNSEL INFORMATION:
`NIMALKA R. WICKRAMASEKERA (SBN: 268518)
`nwickramasekera@winston.com
`DAVID P. DALKE (SBN: 218161)
`ddalke@winston.com
`LEV TSUKERMAN (SBN: 319184)
`ltsukerman@winston.com
`WILLIAM M. WARDLAW (SBN: 328555)
`wwardlaw@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 S. Grand Avenue
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
`Telephone: (213) 615-1700
`Facsimile: (213) 615-1750
`GEORGE C. LOMBARDI (pro hac vice)
`glombardi@winston.com
`BRIAN J. NISBET (pro hac vice)
`bnisbet@winston.com
`SARANYA RAGHAVAN (pro hac vice)
`sraghavan@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601-9703
`Telephone: (312) 558-5600
`Facsimile: (312) 558-5700
`
`ROBERT N. KANG (SBN: 274389)
`rkang@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`101 California Street, 35th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-5840
`Telephone: (415) 591-1000
`Facsimile: (415) 491-1400
`
`Attorneys for Defendants ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC.
`AND ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.
`
`PARTIES’ AGREED PROPOSED VERDICT
`FORM
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34468 Page 3 of 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`INSTRUCTIONS: Answer each of the following Questions 1 through 7,
`following the jury instructions and the instructions given on this Verdict Form.
` “The ’832 patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 8,439,832.
` “The ’801 patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 7,819,801.
` “The ’531 patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 9,974, 531.
`
`PARTIES AGREED PROPOSED VERDICT
`FORM
`
`1
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34469 Page 4 of 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`AGREED QUESTION 2: WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
`Question 2. Did NuVasive prove by a preponderance of the evidence that
`Alphatec willfully infringed the ’832, ’801, or ’531 patents?
`(Checking “Yes” below is finding for NuVasive on the issue; checking “No”
`below is finding for Alphatec on the issue).
`
`(For NuVasive)
`
`(For Alphatec)
`
`’832 Patent
`
`Yes ________
`
`’801 Patent
`
`Yes ________
`
`’531 Patent
`
`Yes ________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` No
`
`________
`
` No
`
`________
`
` No
`
`________
`
`(Continue to Question 3)
`
`PARTIES’ AGREED UPON PROPOSED
`JURY INSTRUCTIONS
`
`2
`
`18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34470 Page 5 of 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`AGREED QUESTION 3: INVALIDITY
`Did Alphatec prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the claims
`of the ’832, ’801, or ’531 patents are invalid as obvious?
`(Checking “Yes” below is finding for Alphatec on the issue; checking “No”
`below is finding for NuVasive on the issue).
`
`’832 Patent
`
`(For Alphatec)
`
`(For NuVasive)
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 3
`
`Claim 9
`
`Yes ________
`
`Yes ________
`
`Yes ________
`
`Claim 10
`
`Yes ________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` No
`
`________
`
` No
`
`________
`
` No
`
`________
`
` No
`
`________
`
`’801 Patent
`
`(For Alphatec)
`
`(For NuVasive)
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 2
`
`Claim 15
`
`Claim 16
`
`Claim 26
`
`Yes ________
`
`Yes ________
`
`Yes ________
`
`Yes ________
`
`Yes ________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` No
`
`________
`
` No
`
`________
`
` No
`
`________
`
` No
`
`________
`
`No
`
`________
`
`PARTIES AGREED PROPOSED VERDICT
`FORM
`
`3
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34471 Page 6 of 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`(For Alphatec)
`
`(For NuVasive)
`
`Yes ________
`
`
`
`
`
` No
`
`________
`
` No
`
`________
`
`’531 Patent
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 39
`
`Yes ________
`
`PARTIES AGREED PROPOSED VERDICT
`FORM
`
`4
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34472 Page 7 of 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`SIGNATURE
`You have now reached the end of the Verdict Form and should review it to
`ensure it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Foreperson
`should then sign and date the Verdict Form in the Spaces Below and notify the
`Courtroom Deputy that you have reached a verdict. The Foreperson should retain
`possession of the verdict form and bring it when the jury is brought back into the
`courtroom.
`
`Dated: ________, 2022
`
`By:
`
`NAME
`
`PARTIES AGREED PROPOSED VERDICT
`FORM
`
`5
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34473 Page 8 of 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Dated: December 20, 2021 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`By: /s/ Christina Dashe
`Christina Dashe
`Morris Fodeman (pro hac vice)
`mfodeman@wsgr.com
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor
`New York, NY 10019-6022
`(212) 999-5800
`
`Wendy L. Devine (SBN 246337)
`wdevine@wsgr.com
`One Market Plaza
`Spear Tower, Suite 3300
`San Francisco, California 94105-1126
`(415) 947-2000
`
`Natalie J. Morgan (SBN 211143)
`nmorgan@wsgr.com
`Christina Dashe (SBN 292360)
`cdashe@wsgr.com
`12235 El Camino Real
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 350-2300
`
`HILGERS GRABEN PLLC
`Michael T. Hilgers (pro hac vice)
`mhilgers@hilgersgraben.com
`575 Fallbrook Blvd., Suite 202
`Lincoln, NE 68521
`(402) 218-2106
`Attorneys for Plaintiff NuVasive, Inc.
`
`PARTIES AGREED PROPOSED VERDICT
`FORM
`
`6
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34474 Page 9 of 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`
`By: /s/ Robert N. Kang
`ROBERT N. KANG (SBN: 274389)
`rkang@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`101 California Street, 35th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-5840
`Telephone: (415) 591-1000
`Facsimile: (415) 491-1400
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Alphatec Holdings,
`Inc. and Alphatec Spine, Inc.
`
`PARTIES AGREED PROPOSED VERDICT
`FORM
`
`7
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34475 Page 10 of 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
`
` I, Christina Dashe, hereby attest that I obtained the concurrence of Robert N.
`Kang in filing this document. I declare under penalty of the laws of the United
`States that the foregoing is true and correct.
` Executed this 20th Day of December 2021 at San Diego, California.
`
`Dated: December 20, 2021 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
`By: /s/ Christina Dashe
`CHRISTINA DASHE
`
`PARTIES AGREED PROPOSED VERDICT
`FORM
`
`8
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 364 Filed 12/20/21 PageID.34476 Page 11 of 11
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`document has been served on this date to all current and/or opposing counsel of
`record, if any to date, who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via
`the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civ.L.R. 5.4(d). Any other counsel of record will
`be served by electronic mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery.
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`America that the above is true and correct. Executed this 20th day of December
`2021 at Los Angeles, California.
`
`By: /s/ Soo Kim
`Soo Kim
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`1
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket