throbber
Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-27 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32611 Page 1 of
`16
`
`EXHIBIT 26
`
`DECLARATION OF TRENT D. TANNER
`IN SUPPORT OF
`NUVASIVE'S OPPOSITION TO
`DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1-10
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-27 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32612 Page 2 of
`16
`
`Robert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes OnlyRobert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`November 05, 2019November 05, 2019
`
`· · · · · · UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`· · · · · ·SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`· · · · · · · · ·SAN DIEGO DIVISION
`
`NUVASIVE, INC., a Delaware
`corporation,
`· · · · · Plaintiff,
`· · · · · v.· · · · ·Case No. 3:18-CV-00347
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · -CAB-MDD
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., a
`Delaware corporation and
`ALPHATEC SPINE, INC., a
`California corporation,
`· · · · · Defendants.
`_______________________________________________________
`· · ·HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`· · · VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF ROBERT JUDD, CPA
`· ·ALPHATEC’S HOLDINGS, INC. RULE 30(b)(6) WITNESS
`· · · · · · · · SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
`· · · · · · · · · NOVEMBER 5, 2019
`
`Reported By:
`PATRICIA Y. SCHULER
`CSR No. 11949
`
`
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.comU.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`

`
`EXHIBIT 26
`Page 560
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-27 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32613 Page 3 of
`16
`
`Robert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes OnlyRobert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`November 05, 2019November 05, 2019
`Page 2
`
`Page 4
`
`·1· · · · · · · ·UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`·2· · · · · · · SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`·3· · · · · · · · · · SAN DIEGO DIVISION
`·4
`·5· ·NUVASIVE, INC., a Delaware
`· · ·corporation,
`·6
`· · · · · · · ·Plaintiff,
`·7
`· · · · · · · ·v.· · · · · · ·Case No. 3:18-CV-00347
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·-CAB-MDD
`· · ·ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., a
`·9· ·Delaware corporation and
`· · ·ALPHATEC SPINE, INC., a
`10· ·California corporation,
`11· · · · · · ·Defendants.
`12· ·_______________________________________________________
`13· · · · Videotaped deposition of ROBERT JUDD, CPA taken
`14· ·on behalf of the Plaintiffs at 12235 El Camino Real,
`15· ·Suite 100, San Diego, California, at 8:59 a.m. and
`16· ·ending at 5:58 p.m., on November 5, 2019, before
`17· ·PATRICIA Y. SCHULER, Certified Shorthand Reporter
`18· ·No. 11949.
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · ·I-N-D-E-X
`·2· ·WITNESS:· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION
`·3· ·ROBERT JUDD, CPA· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
`·4· ·MR. CARLSON· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 7
`·5
`·6
`·7· · · · · · · · · · · E-X-H-I-B-I-T-S
`·8· ·PLAINTIFF'S· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`·9· ·Exhibit 1· · ·Nuvasive, Inc.'s Notice of· · · · · 24
`· · · · · · · · · ·Deposition of Alphatec Holdings,
`10· · · · · · · · ·Inc. and Alphatec Spine, Inc.
`· · · · · · · · · ·Pursuant to rule 30(B)(6)
`11
`· · ·Exhibit 2· · ·LinkedIn Information for R. Judd,· ·28
`12· · · · · · · · ·CPA
`13· ·Exhibit 6· · ·Excel spreadsheet Bates stamped· · 144
`· · · · · · · · · ·ATEC_LLIF000854415
`14
`· · ·Exhibit 8· · ·Thumb drive with Excel· · · · · · ·144
`15· · · · · · · · ·spreadsheets
`16· ·Exhibit 7· · ·Excel spreadsheet Bates stamped· · 187
`· · · · · · · · · ·ATEC_LLIF000854525
`17
`· · ·Exhibit 9· · ·Listing of all agreements· · · · · 213
`18· · · · · · · · ·involving Alphatec
`19· ·Exhibit 10· · Alphatec Spine, Inc. Journal· · · ·217
`· · · · · · · · · ·Entry Form, Bates stamped
`20· · · · · · · · ·ATEC_LLIF000465519 through 465532
`21· ·Exhibit 11· · Nonexclusive Patent License· · · · 222
`· · · · · · · · · ·Agreement, Bates stamped
`22· · · · · · · · ·ATEC_LLIF000262386 through 262404
`23· ·Exhibit 3· · ·Excel spreadsheet Bates stamped· · 224
`· · · · · · · · · ·ATEC_LLIF000004858
`24
`25
`
`·1· ·APPEARANCES:
`·2· ·FOR PLAINTIFF:
`·3· · · · · · ·WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
`·4· · · · · · ·BY:· ERIK J. CARLSON, ESQ.
`·5· · · · · · ·BY:· NATALIE MORGAN, ESQ.
`·6· · · · · · ·633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`·7· · · · · · ·Los Angeles, California· 90071
`·8· · · · · · ·ecarlson@wsgr.com
`·9· ·FOR DEFENDANTS:
`10· · · · · · ·WINSTON STRAWN LLP
`11· · · · · · ·BY:· BRIAN J. NISBET, ESQ.
`12· · · · · · ·35 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4100
`13· · · · · · ·Chicago, Illinois 60601-9703
`14· · · · · · ·bnisbet@winston.com
`15· · · · · · ·- and -
`16· · · · · · ·WINSTON STRAWN LLP
`17· · · · · · ·BY:· NIMALKA R. WICKRAMASEKERA, ESQ.
`18· · · · · · ·333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3800
`19· · · · · · ·Los Angeles, California 90071-1543
`20· · · · · · ·nwickramasekera@winston.com
`21· ·Also Present:
`22· · · · · · ·Blake Inglish, (Telephonic)
`· · · · · · · ·Ryan Mehner (Telephonic)
`23· · · · · · ·Tyson Marshall
`24· ·Videographer:
`25· · · · · · ·Ty Paulson
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 5
`
`·1· · · · · · · · E-X-H-I-B-I-T-S (CONTINUED)
`·2· ·PLAINTIFF'S· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`·3· ·Exhibit 4· · ·Excel spreadsheet Bates stamped· · 224
`· · · · · · · · · ·ATEC_LLIF000004861
`·4
`· · ·Exhibit 12· · Exclusive License Agreement,· · · ·233
`·5· · · · · · · · ·Bates stamped ATEC_LLIF000854416
`· · · · · · · · · ·through 854435
`·6
`· · ·Exhibit 13· · Private Label Distribution· · · · ·239
`·7· · · · · · · · ·Agreement, Bates stamped
`· · · · · · · · · ·ATEC_LLIF000854660 through 854683
`·8
`· · ·Exhibit 14· · Document entitled "Product Line· · 253
`·9· · · · · · · · ·Planning/Input (Phase 1 of 2)"
`· · · · · · · · · ·Bates stamped ATEC_LLIF0000002410
`10· · · · · · · · ·through 2443
`11· ·Exhibit 5· · ·Excel spreadsheet Bates stamped· · 267
`· · · · · · · · · ·ATEC_LLIF000147937
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.comU.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`2 to 5
`
`YVer1f
`
`EXHIBIT 26
`Page 561
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-27 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32614 Page 4 of
`16
`
`Robert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes OnlyRobert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`November 05, 2019November 05, 2019
`Page 6
`
`·1· · ·SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA; TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2019
`·2· · · · · · · · · · · · ·8:59 a.m.
`·3· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Good morning.· We are
`·4· ·on the record at 8:59 a.m. on November 5, 2019.
`·5· ·Audio and video recording will continue to take
`·6· ·place until all parties agree to go off the record.
`·7· ·Please note that the microphones are sensitive and
`·8· ·may pick up whispering and private conversations.
`·9· · · · · · ·This is the video-recorded deposition of
`10· ·Robert Judd, taken by counsel for plaintiff in the
`11· ·matter of Nuvasive, Inc., versus Alphatec Holdings,
`12· ·Inc., filed in the United States District Court,
`13· ·San Diego Division.
`14· · · · · · ·This deposition is taking place at
`15· ·Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, located at
`16· ·12235 El Camino Real, in San Diego, California
`17· ·92130.
`18· · · · · · ·My name is Ty Paulson.· I am the
`19· ·videographer on behalf of U.S. Legal Support,
`20· ·located at 1230 Columbia Street, Suite 400, in
`21· ·San Diego, California 92101.
`22· · · · · · ·The court reporter is Patricia Schuler,
`23· ·on behalf of U.S. Legal Support.· I am not
`24· ·financially interested this action, nor a party to
`25· ·this action.
`
`Page 8
`
`·1· ·Judd.· R-O-B-E-R-T; Jared, J-A-R-E-D; Judd,
`·2· ·J-U-D-D.
`·3· · · · Q.· ·Have you ever been deposed before?
`·4· · · · A.· ·I have not.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· So first I'll go over some ground
`·6· ·rules just about the mechanics of taking a
`·7· ·deposition and getting it transcribed and recorded.
`·8· · · · · · ·You understand you are testifying under
`·9· ·oath?
`10· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`11· · · · Q.· ·And the court reporter sitting here is
`12· ·going to be taking down everything you say and
`13· ·transcribing what is said.· So in order to
`14· ·facilitate that process I ask that if I ask a
`15· ·question, you provide a verbal response, yes or no,
`16· ·so that she can get that down.
`17· · · · · · ·Does that make sense?
`18· · · · A.· ·Yeah.· Yeah.
`19· · · · Q.· ·And I'll do my best to ask a question and
`20· ·stop to wait for you to give an answer.· And I'd
`21· ·ask that we try not to talk over each other.· And I
`22· ·know it gets to be a little difficult, but we
`23· ·should both try our best because it messes up the
`24· ·transcript, okay?
`25· · · · A.· ·Absolutely.
`
`Page 7
`·1· · · · · · ·Counsel will state their appearances for
`·2· ·the record, after which the court reporter will
`·3· ·swear in the witness.
`·4· · · · · · ·MR. CARLSON:· Erik Carlson from Wilson,
`·5· ·Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati appearing for plaintiff
`·6· ·Nuvasive, Inc.· And with me is colleague Natalie
`·7· ·Morgan.· On the line we have our damages expert
`·8· ·Blake English along with his necessary support
`·9· ·personnel Ryan Mainer.
`10· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· My name is Brian Nisbet with
`11· ·Winston and Strawn on behalf of the defendant
`12· ·Alphatec entities.· With me is Tyson Marshall,
`13· ·counsel at Alphatec.
`14
`15· · · · · · · · · · ROBERT JUDD, CPA,
`16· · having been administered an oath, was examined and
`17· · · · · · · · · ·testified as follows:
`18
`19· · · · · · · · · · · · EXAMINATION
`20· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`21· · · · Q.· ·Good morning, Mr. Judd.
`22· · · · A.· ·Good morning.
`23· · · · Q.· ·Could you state and spell your name for
`24· ·the record, please.
`25· · · · A.· ·Yeah.· Robert -- full name Robert Jared
`
`Page 9
`·1· · · · Q.· ·The one thing I ask is that if I have a
`·2· ·question pending, that you answer the question
`·3· ·before you need to take a break.
`·4· · · · A.· ·Okay.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·So in other words, let me take a step
`·6· ·back.· If you need a break at any time just let me
`·7· ·know.· The only time I would ask that we wait to
`·8· ·take a break is if there is a question pending and
`·9· ·you need to give an answer.
`10· · · · A.· ·Okay.
`11· · · · Q.· ·If you don't understand a question,
`12· ·please just ask me for clarification.· And if you
`13· ·do answer, I'll take that as an indication that you
`14· ·understood the question, okay?
`15· · · · A.· ·Okay.
`16· · · · Q.· ·And then one other thing.· Your lawyer
`17· ·may make an objection to the question I ask.· And
`18· ·unless there is an instruction not to answer, I'm
`19· ·entitled to an answer, so you still need to answer
`20· ·after the objection.
`21· · · · A.· ·Okay.
`22· · · · Q.· ·Is there anything that would impact or
`23· ·interfere with your ability to testify truthfully
`24· ·today?
`25· · · · A.· ·No.
`
`
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.comU.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`6 to 9
`
`YVer1f
`
`EXHIBIT 26
`Page 562
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-27 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32615 Page 5 of
`16
`
`Robert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes OnlyRobert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`November 05, 2019November 05, 2019
`Page 38
`·1· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Why don't we go off the
`·2· ·record for a minute.
`·3· · · · · · ·MR. CARLSON:· So you're instructing him
`·4· ·not to answer, and there's a question pending, and
`·5· ·we're going to go off the record?· Counsel, I think
`·6· ·that seems improper.
`·7· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· We can do it all here.
`·8· ·That's fine.· I don't see the reason why you're
`·9· ·asking him questions about who recruited him to
`10· ·Alphatec.· He's a 30(b)6 witness.· You could have
`11· ·served him a 30(b)1 deposition notice, you didn't.
`12· · · · · · ·MR. CARLSON:· We didn't need to.
`13· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`14· · · · Q.· ·Which Alphatec executive officer or
`15· ·employee actually offered you the job?
`16· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`17· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· So the person that offered
`18· ·me the job -- and actually by the way, when they
`19· ·offered me the job, I told them this is not about
`20· ·money for me -- was Jeff Black, the CFO.
`21· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`22· · · · Q.· ·Did he interview you for your position at
`23· ·Alphatec also?
`24· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`25· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I don't understand your
`
`Page 40
`·1· · · · A.· ·You're telling me there are seven, I
`·2· ·don't know.
`·3· · · · Q.· ·Have you reviewed any patents in
`·4· ·preparation for your deposition today?
`·5· · · · A.· ·I did not review any patents.
`·6· · · · Q.· ·Do you know anything about the nature of
`·7· ·the patents that are asserted in this case?
`·8· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· I object to the form of the
`·9· ·question, instruct you not to answer to the extent
`10· ·you have any sort of understanding that you gained
`11· ·from counsel.· If you have an independent
`12· ·understanding --
`13· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· No, I don't.
`14· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· -- you can answer.
`15· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`16· · · · Q.· ·You haven't read anything online about
`17· ·the case that identified what the patents generally
`18· ·relate to?
`19· · · · A.· ·No.· No.
`20· · · · Q.· ·Do you have an understanding of the
`21· ·accused products that are at issue in the case?
`22· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· I would just reiterate my
`23· ·objection to the extent that you gained any
`24· ·understanding from counsel on that, exclude that
`25· ·from your answer.
`
`Page 39
`·1· ·question.· Did Jeff Black interview for a job at
`·2· ·Nuvasive?· Sorry.
`·3· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·4· · · · Q.· ·Was he the one who interviewed you before
`·5· ·you got your offer to join Alphatec?
`·6· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`·7· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Did he interview me for the
`·8· ·job at Alphatec?
`·9· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`10· · · · Q.· ·Right.· Did you have to go through an
`11· ·interview as part of getting your job at Alphatec?
`12· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`13· · · · Q.· ·And was he the one involved in that
`14· ·interview?
`15· · · · A.· ·He was, yes.
`16· · · · Q.· ·Did you get a signing bonus when you
`17· ·joined Alphatec?
`18· · · · A.· ·I did not.
`19· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`20· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`21· · · · Q.· ·Do you know what patents are asserted in
`22· ·this case?
`23· · · · A.· ·I don't know all of the patents.
`24· · · · Q.· ·Do you understand that there are seven
`25· ·patents asserted?
`
`Page 41
`
`·1· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· What do you mean by
`·2· ·understanding?
`·3· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·4· · · · Q.· ·Let me ask a different question.
`·5· · · · · · ·You understand that this is a patent
`·6· ·case, right?
`·7· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·8· · · · Q.· ·And Nuvasive is asserting patents against
`·9· ·Alphatec, right?
`10· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`11· · · · Q.· ·And I will represent to you there are
`12· ·seven patents asserted.
`13· · · · A.· ·Okay.
`14· · · · Q.· ·And in the case, Nuvasive has accused
`15· ·products made by Alphatec of infringing those seven
`16· ·patents.
`17· · · · A.· ·Makes sense.
`18· · · · Q.· ·Do you have an understanding of what
`19· ·those products that are accused of infringement
`20· ·are, the Alphatec products?
`21· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· And I will reiterate my
`22· ·objection.
`23· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I know what products are
`24· ·included in the data we've provided to you. I
`25· ·guess that's the best way I know how to answer that
`
`
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.comU.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`38 to 41
`
`YVer1f
`
`EXHIBIT 26
`Page 563
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-27 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32616 Page 6 of
`16
`
`Robert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes OnlyRobert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`November 05, 2019November 05, 2019
`Page 42
`
`·1· ·question.
`·2· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·3· · · · Q.· ·And what products are included in the
`·4· ·data that you provided to us?
`·5· · · · A.· ·Yeah, it's the Battalion lateral and
`·6· ·interbody spacers.· There is also light cable for
`·7· ·the retractor, various neuromonitoring products are
`·8· ·in the sales data as well.
`·9· · · · Q.· ·So I have the Battalion lateral interbody
`10· ·spacer, the light cable, and various
`11· ·neuromonitoring products?
`12· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`13· · · · Q.· ·Anything else?
`14· · · · A.· ·If we pulled up a document, we might find
`15· ·something else in there, but nothing that I can
`16· ·recall.
`17· · · · Q.· ·We were discussing before the topics that
`18· ·you were designated to testify regarding, right?
`19· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`20· · · · Q.· ·And one of those topics you remember was
`21· ·No. 9?
`22· · · · A.· ·Yup.
`23· · · · Q.· ·And No. 9 reads, "Any Alphatec products
`24· ·intended to be used in conjunction with, sold with,
`25· ·or packaged with the accused products."
`
`Page 44
`·1· ·on.
`·2· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Again, I would ask you to
`·3· ·clarify what you mean by "understanding."
`·4· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·5· · · · Q.· ·You understand that you're the
`·6· ·spokesperson for Alphatec on Topic 9, right?
`·7· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`·8· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· You have told me that a
`·9· ·couple of times now, yes.
`10· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`11· · · · Q.· ·And you agreed to be the spokesperson,
`12· ·right?
`13· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`14· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I know I am here to talk to
`15· ·you about Topic No. 9.
`16· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`17· · · · Q.· ·And in order to prepare to be the
`18· ·spokesperson for Alphatec on Topic 9 --
`19· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`20· · · · Q.· ·-- what did you use as an understanding
`21· ·for accused products to prepare?
`22· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`23· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I guess I'm still not clear
`24· ·on what you mean by "understanding."· I mean, I
`25· ·feel like maybe we're disconnected on what
`
`Page 43
`·1· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`·2· · · · Q.· ·What did you do to prepare to testify in
`·3· ·response to this topic?
`·4· · · · A.· ·So again, looked at the sales data in the
`·5· ·sales cube.· I guess to clarify, the sales cube has
`·6· ·a lot of information in it, so there's other
`·7· ·information in that database that would tell, you
`·8· ·know, what -- I mean, to this point you can look at
`·9· ·a case or an order and see what products are used
`10· ·in those cases.· So looking through that database
`11· ·and then, again, as I mentioned, talking to Mike to
`12· ·make sure I understood what those products were,
`13· ·because I -- there's a lot -- the detail at which
`14· ·those are represented in that sales cube is not
`15· ·always at the level of detail which I look at that
`16· ·stuff in my day-to-day basis.
`17· · · · Q.· ·So Topic 9, refers to the accused
`18· ·products, right?
`19· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`20· · · · Q.· ·How did you prepare to testify if you
`21· ·didn't have an understanding of accused products?
`22· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.· He's
`23· ·here to -- he's prepared to testify subject to our
`24· ·responses and objections, which I think clarifies
`25· ·the scope of the products he's prepared to testify
`
`Page 45
`
`·1· ·understanding means.
`·2· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·3· · · · Q.· ·Let me try again.· Try a different angle.
`·4· · · · · · ·Topic 9 describes some information that
`·5· ·Nuvasive is interested in learning about in this
`·6· ·deposition, right?
`·7· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`·8· · · · Q.· ·And I'll represent to you that when
`·9· ·you're designated as a 30(b)6 witness, you're a
`10· ·company spokesperson, which we have discussed on
`11· ·that topic?
`12· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`13· · · · Q.· ·So how are we -- how are you prepared to
`14· ·give us information about Topic 9 if you don't have
`15· ·an understanding of what the accused products are?
`16· · · · A.· ·Well --
`17· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`18· ·Mischaracterizes his testimony.
`19· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Yeah, I guess I would
`20· ·disagree with your statement that I don't have an
`21· ·understanding.· I guess I'm trying to understand
`22· ·what you mean by that.· Do I understand what the
`23· ·products are?· I understand these are the accused
`24· ·products.· So I guess I'm not sure what -- maybe
`25· ·not answering your question, but I don't understand
`
`
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.comU.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`42 to 45
`
`YVer1f
`
`EXHIBIT 26
`Page 564
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-27 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32617 Page 7 of
`16
`
`Robert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes OnlyRobert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`November 05, 2019November 05, 2019
`Page 46
`
`·1· ·what the question is.
`·2· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·3· · · · Q.· ·When preparing to testify in response to
`·4· ·Topic 9, did you consider the Alphatec LLIF
`·5· ·Squadron retractor to be an accused product?
`·6· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`·7· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Do you have a copy of our
`·8· ·responses and rejections.· Maybe this will
`·9· ·short-circuit --
`10· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`11· · · · Q.· ·I just have it in my notes.
`12· · · · A.· ·Okay.
`13· · · · Q.· ·Which is what I am reading from, your
`14· ·responses.
`15· · · · A.· ·Yeah, I think I had a list presented to
`16· ·me that named the accused products.· And believe
`17· ·the retractor was on that list.
`18· · · · Q.· ·That's Alphatec LLIF Squadron retractor?
`19· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`20· · · · Q.· ·And the dilator was on that list too?
`21· · · · A.· ·I believe the dilator is on there as
`22· ·well.
`23· · · · Q.· ·And the K-wire?
`24· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`25· · · · Q.· ·And the intradiscal shim?
`
`Page 48
`
`·1· · · · Q.· ·And you said you talked to Mike?
`·2· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`·3· · · · Q.· ·And we previously discussed that, right?
`·4· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·What information regarding those products
`·6· ·that I just listed as the accused products did Mike
`·7· ·provide?
`·8· · · · A.· ·So in some of our sales data there's also
`·9· ·some other products that aren't actually on the
`10· ·accused products list.· Some of those are, well,
`11· ·what I mentioned earlier, neuromonitoring products.
`12· ·So I'm trying to understand what products were and
`13· ·weren't neuromonitoring, and so that was part of
`14· ·the discussion.· And then also a question like on
`15· ·the shim, making sure I understood exactly how the
`16· ·shim is used in the surgery.
`17· · · · Q.· ·So sticking on the first thing you
`18· ·mentioned that you discussed with Mike, that was an
`19· ·explanation of what were or were not
`20· ·neuromonitoring products or related products?
`21· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`22· · · · Q.· ·And what testimony or information do you
`23· ·have about what those neuromonitoring products are?
`24· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`25· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Sorry.· Do I understand --
`
`Page 47
`
`·1· · · · A.· ·Yes, that sounds right.
`·2· · · · Q.· ·And shim inserter tool?
`·3· · · · A.· ·Um-hmm.
`·4· · · · Q.· ·And the Battalion lateral spacer?
`·5· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·6· · · · Q.· ·The fourth blade?
`·7· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·8· · · · Q.· ·And the light cable/light source
`·9· ·connector.
`10· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`11· · · · · · ·Sorry.· You just wanted me to name those,
`12· ·that's all you wanted me to do?
`13· · · · Q.· ·Yeah.
`14· · · · A.· ·Sorry.· I thought you were getting at
`15· ·some other understanding of those products, like --
`16· ·sorry.
`17· · · · Q.· ·It's okay.· Due to the formality of this
`18· ·deposition, sometimes you get tripped up on things
`19· ·that we shouldn't?
`20· · · · A.· ·Yeah, I definitely -- I know those
`21· ·products.· I know their names.· I am clear those
`22· ·were the accused products, yes.
`23· · · · Q.· ·I think we were talking about what you
`24· ·did to prepare for this topic, right?
`25· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`
`Page 49
`
`·1· ·sorry.· Can you say that one more time?
`·2· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·3· · · · Q.· ·Sure.· What testimony or information do
`·4· ·you have about what neuromonitoring products are
`·5· ·included in the sales cube that you reviewed?
`·6· · · · A.· ·Yeah, I mean, if we were to pull it up
`·7· ·and look at it, I'm prepared to tell you what
`·8· ·products are neuromonitoring and which aren't and
`·9· ·do my best to articulate what those products do.
`10· · · · Q.· ·Just generally, when you're preferring to
`11· ·neuromonitoring products, are you referring to the
`12· ·neuromonitor or something else?
`13· · · · A.· ·Fair question.· I'm referring to the
`14· ·products that are disposables and are used with
`15· ·neuromonitoring.· You know, so not the
`16· ·neuromonitoring equipment per se, but typically the
`17· ·disposables that are used during surgery and billed
`18· ·for.
`19· · · · Q.· ·And do you have just an example?· We'll
`20· ·get to the sales cube in a little bit, but do you
`21· ·have just an example of a disposable that is used
`22· ·with a neuromonitor?
`23· · · · A.· ·Yeah.· So a couple are, you have a clip,
`24· ·clips onto the -- the dilator when you're trying to
`25· ·get down into the surgery site.· You have a probe
`
`
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.comU.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`46 to 49
`
`YVer1f
`
`EXHIBIT 26
`Page 565
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-27 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32618 Page 8 of
`16
`
`Robert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes OnlyRobert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`November 05, 2019November 05, 2019
`Page 66
`·1· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I would say, "No."· I mean.
`·2· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·3· · · · Q.· ·Why not?
`·4· · · · A.· ·Well, because I don't know -- it's not --
`·5· ·surgeons have all kinds of different practices and
`·6· ·uses, and again, if you ask me, is there a
`·7· ·likelihood that a Squadron -- is it possible?· Oh,
`·8· ·yeah, it's possible, and probably more than
`·9· ·50 percent of the time I would guess, but I'm just
`10· ·guessing.· Like you're asking me, looking at the
`11· ·information in the sales cube, can I say that that
`12· ·implant was sold therefore our Squadron retractor
`13· ·was used?· And, no, I can't make that connection.
`14· ·Is there a possibility or even a likelihood?
`15· ·Potentially, but I'm speculating because I don't
`16· ·know.
`17· · · · Q.· ·So are you aware that the Alphatec LLIF
`18· ·implant is designed specifically to work with the
`19· ·Alphatec Squadron retractor?
`20· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`21· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· That's not something that I
`22· ·know to be the case.
`23· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`24· · · · Q.· ·You disagree with that?
`25· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`
`Page 68
`·1· ·sales cube spreadsheet that would indicate a
`·2· ·Squadron retractor was not used when an Alphatec
`·3· ·LLIF implant was used?
`·4· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection; to form.
`·5· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· There's nothing in the data
`·6· ·that would tell me that one wasn't used either.
`·7· ·Just like there is nothing that would tell me it is
`·8· ·used.
`·9· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Is this maybe a good time to
`10· ·break?· Are you done with that topic?
`11· · · · · · ·MR. CARLSON:· I was about to move on, so
`12· ·it's a perfect time.
`13· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· We are off the record
`14· ·at 10:18 a.m.
`15· · · · · · ·(Recess taken.)
`16· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· We're back on the
`17· ·record at 10:29 a.m.
`18· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`19· · · · Q.· ·Good morning again, Mr. Malone.· You
`20· ·understand you're still under oath?
`21· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`22· · · · Q.· ·Sorry.· Not Mr. Malone.· Mr. Judd.· We
`23· ·are scheduling a lot of depositions.· It's hard to
`24· ·keep everyone straight.· I'm sorry, Mr. Judd.
`25· · · · A.· ·I am not Mr. Malone.· But yes, I do
`
`Page 67
`·1· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I'm not a clinical expert.
`·2· ·I don't know what you do with an implant to make it
`·3· ·specifically for use with a retractor.
`·4· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Right.· So if an Alphatec LLIF implant is
`·6· ·sold, you don't know one way or another whether
`·7· ·that implant could work with a retractor other than
`·8· ·the squadron?
`·9· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`10· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Again, based on my
`11· ·understanding just to use your example of a --
`12· ·we're talking about an Alphatec Battalion lateral
`13· ·spacer that gets used.· Is there a possibility that
`14· ·a Medtronic retractor was used with the surgery, or
`15· ·that a Nuvasive retractor was used or that a DuPuy
`16· ·retractor was used?· I mean, that's a possibility.
`17· ·Retractors, again, from my understanding, is just
`18· ·making an access pathway.· These spacers are all
`19· ·kind of the same size, so I don't know that a
`20· ·retractor is designed to be used with -- again, I
`21· ·feel like I'm on the edge of my clinical knowledge,
`22· ·but I don't know that I connect the two in that
`23· ·way.· It's not a closed system I guess.
`24· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`25· · · · Q.· ·Is there anything in the data in the
`
`Page 69
`·1· ·understand I am still under oath.
`·2· · · · Q.· ·So right before the break, we were
`·3· ·talking about some of the components that Alphatec
`·4· ·sells or provides for a lateral procedure, right?
`·5· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`·6· · · · Q.· ·One of the components we were discussing
`·7· ·was the shim that Alphatec sells for a lateral
`·8· ·procedure.
`·9· · · · A.· ·Yeah.
`10· · · · Q.· ·Is that shim specifically designed to be
`11· ·used with Alphatec's Squadron retractor?
`12· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`13· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I don't know the answer to
`14· ·that.
`15· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`16· · · · Q.· ·Do you have any knowledge or information
`17· ·of Alphatec's shim being used with another
`18· ·retractor?
`19· · · · A.· ·I don't.
`20· · · · Q.· ·Now, the light cable that Alphatec sells
`21· ·for a lateral procedure, is that light cable
`22· ·designed specifically to be used with an Alphatec
`23· ·Squadron retractor?
`24· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`25· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· My understanding is that it
`
`
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.comU.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`66 to 69
`
`YVer1f
`
`EXHIBIT 26
`Page 566
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-27 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32619 Page 9 of
`16
`
`Robert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes OnlyRobert Judd, CPA· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`November 05, 2019November 05, 2019
`Page 70
`·1· ·is designed to fit with the Alphatec retractor.
`·2· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·3· · · · Q.· ·Are you aware of any other retractor that
`·4· ·is designed to work with Alphatec's light cable?
`·5· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`·6· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I am not aware of anyone
`·7· ·else that is designing a retractor to work -- or
`·8· ·has designed a retractor to work with our light
`·9· ·cable.· But I don't know whether it is or is not
`10· ·compatible with anyone else's.
`11· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`12· · · · Q.· ·Alphatec does not intend that a retractor
`13· ·other than the Squadron be used with its LLIF
`14· ·implant, right?
`15· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.· It's
`16· ·outside the scope.
`17· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I don't know that I can
`18· ·answer that question.
`19· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`20· · · · Q.· ·You have no information of knowledge of
`21· ·Alphatec's intent -- strike that.
`22· · · · · · ·Do you have any knowledge or information
`23· ·as to whether Alphatec intends its LLIF implants to
`24· ·be used with a retractor other than the Alphatec's
`25· ·Squadron retractor?
`
`Page 72
`·1· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`·2· · · · Q.· ·Is the K-wire -- sorry.· Strike that.
`·3· · · · · · ·What Alphatec products are sold with
`·4· ·Alphatec's K-wire?
`·5· · · · A.· ·I think when you see -- I mean, I think a
`·6· ·K-wire is probably similar to some of the other
`·7· ·products we discussed early.· I mean, you see a
`·8· ·K-wire -- and just to clarify, I suppose we are
`·9· ·talking about the K-wires.· They're specifically
`10· ·for lateral -- designed for lateral use.· Because,
`11· ·I mean, there's K-wires used in all kinds of
`12· ·different procedures, right?
`13· · · · Q.· ·Yes.· Thank you for that clarification.
`14· ·I will re-ask the question.
`15· · · · · · ·Is Alphatec's K-wire that is sold for a
`16· ·lateral procedure sold with any other Alphatec
`17· ·products?
`18· · · · A.· ·Yeah.· I often see that K-wire sold with
`19· ·the dilators.· You know, you see -- you do see --
`20· ·again, see the light cables often, the shims, the
`21· ·spacers in cases where there is a -- cases or
`22· ·surgeries where there is a K-wire.
`23· · · · Q.· ·Is Alphatec's K-wire for a lateral
`24· ·procedure packaged with other Alphatec products?
`25· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.
`
`Page 71
`·1· · · · · · ·MR. NISBET:· Objection to form.· Outside
`·2· ·the scope.
`·3· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· What I can tell you is that
`·4· ·my understanding of what we are doing at Alphatec
`·5· ·is we are trying to -- trying to make products that
`·6· ·will work for a lateral procedure.
`·7· · · · · · ·There are many elements of a lateral
`·8· ·procedure, one being, like we started out
`·9· ·discussing, access.· Of course you need a cage to
`10· ·put into space, the vertebrae.
`11· ·BY MR. CARLSON:
`12· · · · Q.· ·Alphatec sells a K-wire for use in a
`13· ·lateral procedure, right?
`14· · · · A.· ·That is my understanding, yes.
`15· · · · Q.· ·What products are intended to be used in
`16· ·conjunction with Alphatec's

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket