throbber
Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-1 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32026 Page 1 of 6
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`DECLARATION OF TRENT D. TANNER
`IN SUPPORT OF
`NUVASIVE'S OPPOSITION TO
`DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1-10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-1 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32027 Page 2 of 6
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN DIEGO DIVISION
`
`CASE NO.: 18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`[PROPOSED] PRETRIAL ORDER
`
`Judge: Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo
`Courtroom: 15A
`
`Trial Date: December 8, 2021
`
`))
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`NUVASIVE, INC., a Delaware
`corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., a
`Delaware corporation, and ALPHATEC
`SPINE, INC., a California corporation,
`
`Defendants.
`
`[PROPOSED] PRETRIAL ORDER
`
`18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`
`
`2 2
`
`
`
`3 3
`
`
`
`4 4
`
`
`
`5 5
`
`
`
`6 6
`
`
`
`7 7
`
`
`
`8 8
`
`
`
`9 9
`
`
`
`10 10
`
`
`
`11 11
`
`
`
`12 12
`
`
`
`13 13
`
`
`
`14 14
`
`
`
`15 15
`
`
`
`16 16
`
`
`
`17 17
`
`
`
`18 18
`
`
`
`19 19
`
`
`
`20 20
`
`
`
`21 21
`
`
`
`22 22
`
`
`
`23 23
`
`
`
`24 24
`
`
`
`25 25
`
`
`
`26 26
`
`
`
`27 27
`
`
`
`28 28
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-1 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32028 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`
`
`2 2
`
`
`
`3 3
`
`
`
`4 4
`
`
`
`5 5
`
`
`
`6 6
`
`
`
`7 7
`
`
`
`8 8
`
`
`
`9 9
`
`Following pretrial proceedings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and CivLR
`
`16.1.f.6.
`
`IT IS ORDERED:
`
`I.
`
`NATURE OF THE CASE
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement. In this case, Plaintiff
`
`NuVasive, Inc. (or “NuVasive” for short) alleges that Defendants Alphatec
`
`Holdings, Inc. and Alphatec Spine, Inc. (collectively “Alphatec” for short) infringe
`
`three U.S. Patents. The first patent is U.S. Patent Number 8,439,832, which the
`
`Court and Parties will often refer to by the last three digits of the patent number, so
`
`
`
`10 10
`
`that is “the ’832 Patent.” The second patent is U.S. Patent Number 7,819,801, which
`
`
`
`11 11
`
`the Court and Parties will often refer to as “the ’801 Patent.” The third patent is U.S.
`
`
`
`12 12
`
`Patent Number 9,974,531, which the Court and Parties will often refer to as “the
`
`
`
`13 13
`
`’531 Patent”. The ’832 Patent, ’801 Patent, and ’531 Patent are the “Asserted
`
`
`
`14 14
`
`Patents.” The Asserted Patents generally relate to the field of spine surgery.
`
`
`
`15 15
`
`NuVasive owns the Asserted Patents. NuVasive alleges that certain of Alphatec’s
`
`
`
`16 16
`
`surgical access systems and implants infringe the Asserted Patents.
`
`
`
`17 17
`
`2.
`
`[NuVasive’s Position: The next paragraph of the neutral statement
`
`
`
`18 18
`
`should read as follows: “The Court has already determined that Alphatec infringes
`
`
`
`19 19
`
`the ’832 Patent. As to the ’801 Patent and the ’531 Patent, NuVasive has the burden
`
`
`
`20 20
`
`of proving that the accused products infringe those patents by a preponderance of
`
`
`
`21 21
`
`the evidence.”]; [Alphatec’s Position: The next paragraph of the neutral statement
`
`
`
`22 22
`
`should read as follows: “NuVasive has the burden of proving that the accused
`
`
`
`23 23
`
`products infringe the ’801 Patent and the ’531 Patent by a preponderance of the
`
`
`
`24 24
`
`evidence. Alphatec denies infringement of the ’801 Patent and ’531 Patent. You
`
`
`
`25 25
`
`will not be asked to decide whether Alphatec has infringed the ’832 Patent.”]
`
`
`
`26 26
`
`3.
`
`Alphatec denies willful infringement as to each Asserted Patent.
`
`
`
`27 27
`
`Alphatec also alleges that each of the Asserted Patents is invalid. Alphatec has the
`
`
`
`28 28
`
`[PROPOSED] PRETRIAL ORDER
`
`1
`
`18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-1 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32029 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`
`
`2 2
`
`
`
`3 3
`
`
`
`4 4
`
`
`
`5 5
`
`
`
`6 6
`
`
`
`7 7
`
`
`
`8 8
`
`
`
`9 9
`
`burden of proving that each Asserted Patent is invalid by clear and convincing
`
`evidence.
`
`4.
`
`NuVasive seeks damages for Alphatec’s infringement of the Asserted
`
`Patents and contends that such infringement has been, and continues to be, willful.
`
`5.
`
` Alphatec contends that NuVasive is not entitled to any damages
`
`because Alphatec does not infringe any valid claim of the Asserted Patents.
`
`II.
`
`CAUSES OF ACTION
`
`A.
`
`6.
`
`NuVasive’s Causes of Action
`
`NuVasive filed its Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement [Doc.
`
`
`
`10 10
`
`No. 110] on September 13, 2018 (“Operative Complaint”) originally alleging Eleven
`
`
`
`11 11
`
`causes of action for patent infringement.
`
`
`
`12 12
`
`7.
`
`[NuVasive’s Position: Omit the following paragraph]; [Alphatec’s
`
`
`
`13 13
`
`Position: “On September 3, 2021, the Court provided its Notes for Scheduling
`
`
`
`14 14
`
`Conference, identifying the patents and issues remaining in this case after the
`
`
`
`15 15
`
`Court’s previous rulings [Doc. Nos. 281, 282, 333]. On September 7, 2021, the
`
`
`
`16 16
`
`Court ordered NuVasive to provide a final disclosure of patent claims to be asserted
`
`
`
`17 17
`
`at trial by September 24, 2021 [Doc. No. 335].”]
`
`
`
`18 18
`
`8.
`
`On September 24, 2021, NuVasive provided its Final Disclosure of
`
`
`
`19 19
`
`Patent Claims to be Asserted at Trial [Doc No. 336]. [NuVasive’s Position:
`
`
`
`20 20
`
`“Pursuant to Doc. No. 336, the following causes of action will be tried to the jury at
`
`
`
`21 21
`
`the December 2021 trial:
`
`
`
`22 22
`
`
`
`23 23
`
`
`
`24 24
`
`
`
`25 25
`
`
`
`26 26
`
`
`
`27 27
`
`™ Third Cause of Action: Direct and indirect infringement of the ’832 Patent
`under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a)–(c);
`
`™ First Cause of Action: Direct and indirect infringement of the ’801 Patent
`under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a)–(c);
`
`™ Tenth Cause of Action: Direct and indirect infringement of the ’531 Patent
`under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a)–(c).”]
`
`9.
`
`[Alphatec’s Position: “Pursuant to Doc. No. 336, only the following
`
`
`
`28 28
`
`causes of action remain to be tried to the jury”]:
`
`[PROPOSED] PRETRIAL ORDER
`
`2
`
`18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-1 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32030 Page 5 of 6
`
`Dated: November 5, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`
`By:
`Wendy L. Devine (SBN 246337)
`
`Morris Fodeman (pro hac vice)
`mfodeman@wsgr.com
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor
`New York, NY 10019-6022
`(212) 999-5800
`
`Wendy L. Devine (SBN 246337)
`wdevine@wsgr.com
`One Market Plaza
`Spear Tower, Suite 3300
`San Francisco, California 94105-1126
`(415) 947-2000
`
`Natalie J. Morgan (SBN 211143)
`nmorgan@wsgr.com
`12235 El Camino Real
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 350-2300
`
`HILGERS GRABEN PLLC
`Michael T. Hilgers (pro hac vice)
`mhilgers@hilgersgraben.com
`575 Fallbrook Blvd., Suite 202
`Lincoln, NE 68521
`(402) 218-2106
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff NuVasive, Inc.
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`
`
`2 2
`
`
`
`3 3
`
`
`
`4 4
`
`
`
`5 5
`
`
`
`6 6
`
`
`
`7 7
`
`
`
`8 8
`
`
`
`9 9
`
`
`
`10 10
`
`
`
`11 11
`
`
`
`12 12
`
`
`
`13 13
`
`
`
`14 14
`
`
`
`15 15
`
`
`
`16 16
`
`
`
`17 17
`
`
`
`18 18
`
`
`
`19 19
`
`
`
`20 20
`
`
`
`21 21
`
`
`
`22 22
`
`
`
`23 23
`
`
`
`24 24
`
`
`
`25 25
`
`
`
`26 26
`
`
`
`27 27
`
`
`
`28 28
`
`[PROPOSED] PRETRIAL ORDER
`
`29
`
`18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 350-1 Filed 11/06/21 PageID.32031 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`1 1
`
`
`
`2 2
`
`
`
`3 3
`
`
`
`4 4
`
`
`
`5 5
`
`
`
`6 6
`
`
`
`7 7
`
`
`
`8 8
`
`
`
`9 9
`
`
`
`10 10
`
`
`
`11 11
`
`
`
`12 12
`
`
`
`13 13
`
`
`
`14 14
`
`
`
`15 15
`
`
`
`16 16
`
`
`
`17 17
`
`
`
`18 18
`
`
`
`19 19
`
`
`
`20 20
`
`
`
`21 21
`
`
`
`22 22
`
`
`
`23 23
`
`
`
`24 24
`
`
`
`25 25
`
`
`
`26 26
`
`
`
`27 27
`
`
`
`28 28
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`document has been served on this date to all current and/or opposing counsel of
`
`record, if any to date, who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via
`
`the Court’s CM/ECF system per CivLR 5.4(d). Any other counsel of record will be
`
`served by electronic mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`
`America that the above is true and correct. Executed this 8th day of October 2021
`
`at Los Angeles, California.
`
`By: /s/ Soo Kim
`Soo Kim
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`1
`
`18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`Page 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket