throbber
Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307-29 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.30086 Page 1 of 6
`
`EXHIBIT 28
`
`TO THE DECLARATION OF BRIAN J.
`NISBET IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’
`OPPOSITION TO NUVASIVE’S MOTION
`FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307-29 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.30087 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`Scott Robinson· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes OnlyScott Robinson· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`October 29, 2019October 29, 2019
`
`· · · · · · · · ·UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`· · · · · · · · SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`· · · · · · · · · · · SAN DIEGO DIVISION
`
`· · ·
`
` · ·NUVASIVE, INC., a Delaware
`· · ·corporation,
`
`··
`
` · · · · · · ·Plaintiff,
`
`··
`
` · · · · · · ·v.· · · · ·Case No. 3:18-CV-00347
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·-CAB-MDD
`· · ·ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., a
`· · ·Delaware corporation and
`· · ·ALPHATEC SPINE, INC., a
`· · ·California corporation,
`
`· · · · · · · ·Defendants.
`
`· · ·_______________________________________________________
`
`· · · · · HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`
`· · · · · · VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF SCOTT ROBINSON
`
`· · · · ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC. RULE 30(b)(6) WITNESS
`
`· · · · · · · · · · ·SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
`
`· · · · · · · · · · · ·OCTOBER 29, 2019
`
`· ·
`
` · ·Reported By:
`· · ·PATRICIA Y. SCHULER
`· · ·CSR No. 11949
`
`· · · ·
`
`
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.comU.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`

`
`EXHIBIT 28 - PAGE 413
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307-29 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.30088 Page 3 of 6
`
`Scott Robinson· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`Scott Robinson· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`October 29, 2019
`October 29, 2019
`
`·1· · · · · · · ·UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`·2· · · · · · · SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · · SAN DIEGO DIVISION
`
`Page 2
`
`·4
`
`·5· ·NUVASIVE, INC., a Delaware
`
`· · ·corporation,
`
`·6
`
`· · · · · · · ·Plaintiff,
`
`·7
`
`· · · · · · · ·v.· · · · · · ·Case No. 3:18-CV-00347
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·-CAB-MDD
`
`· · ·ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., a
`
`·9· ·Delaware corporation and
`
`· · ·ALPHATEC SPINE, INC., a
`
`10· ·California corporation,
`
`11· · · · · · ·Defendants.
`
`12· ·_______________________________________________________
`
`13· · · · Videotaped deposition of SCOTT ROBINSON, taken
`
`14· ·on behalf of the Defendants at 12235 El Camino Real,
`
`15· ·Suite 100, San Diego, California, at 9:18 a.m. and
`
`16· ·ending at 6:27 p.m., on October 29, 2019, before
`
`17· ·PATRICIA Y. SCHULER, Certified Shorthand Reporter
`
`18· ·No. 11949.
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 4
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · ·I-N-D-E-X
`·2· ·WITNESS:· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·EXAMINATION
`·3· ·SCOTT ROBINSON· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
`·4· ·MS. DEVINE· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·7
`·5
`·6
`·7· · · · · · · · · · · E-X-H-I-B-I-T-S
`·8· ·PLAINTIFF'S· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`·9· ·Exhibit 1· · ·Defendants' Responses and· · · · · ·15
`· · · · · · · · · ·Objections to Nuvasive Inc.'s
`10· · · · · · · · ·Notice of Deposition of Alphatec
`· · · · · · · · · ·Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6)
`11
`· · ·Exhibit 2· · ·Nuvasive, Inc.'s Notice of· · · · · 22
`12· · · · · · · · ·Deposition of Alphatec Holdings,
`· · · · · · · · · ·Inc. and Alphatec Spine, Inc.
`13· · · · · · · · ·Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6)
`14· ·Exhibit 3· · ·Nuvasive's Notice of Deposition· · ·25
`· · · · · · · · · ·of Scott Robinson
`15
`· · ·Exhibit 4· · ·LinkedIn profile for Scott· · · · · 50
`16· · · · · · · · ·Robinson
`17· ·Exhibit 5· · ·Course Program and Travel· · · · · ·83
`· · · · · · · · · ·Itinerary, Bates stamped
`18· · · · · · · · ·ATEC_LLIF000626779
`19· ·Exhibit 6· · ·Conduct Internal Training 6.4.9,· · 91
`· · · · · · · · · ·Bates stamped ATEC_LLIF000002354
`20· · · · · · · · ·through 2397
`21· ·Exhibit 7· · ·Surgical Technique Guide, Bates· · ·98
`· · · · · · · · · ·stamped ABOU003617 through 3640
`22
`· · ·Exhibit 8· · ·Document Bates stamped NUVA_ATEC· ·182
`23· · · · · · · · ·001447 to 0014475
`24· ·Exhibit 9· · ·Document Bates stamped ATEC_LLIF· ·207
`· · · · · · · · · ·00004548 to 4561
`25
`
`·1· ·APPEARANCES:
`
`·2· ·FOR PLAINTIFF:
`
`·3· · · · · · ·WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
`
`·4· · · · · · ·BY:· WENDY L. DEVINE, ESQ.
`
`·5· · · · · · ·BY:· CHRISTINA DASHE, ESQ.
`
`·6· · · · · · ·BY:· PAUL D. TRIPOD, II, ESQ.
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 5
`
`·1· · · · · · · · E-X-H-I-B-I-T-S (CONTINUED)
`
`·2· ·PLAINTIFF'S· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE
`
`·3· ·Exhibit 10· · Document Bates stamped· · · · · · ·212
`
`· · · · · · · · · ·ATEC_LLIF000003809 through 3818
`
`·4
`
`· · ·Exhibit 11· · Document Bates stamped ATEC LLIF· ·221
`
`·5· · · · · · · · ·0003829 to 3835
`
`·7· · · · · · ·One Market Plaza, Spear Tower
`
`·6· ·Exhibit 12· · Document Bates stamped ATEC_LLIF· ·228
`
`·8· · · · · · ·Suite 3300
`
`· · · · · · · · · ·000137018 to 137039
`
`·9· · · · · · ·San Francisco, California· 94105
`
`·7
`
`10· · · · · · ·wdevine@wsgr.com
`
`11· ·FOR DEFENDANTS:
`
`12· · · · · · ·WINSTON STRAWN LLP
`
`13· · · · · · ·BY:· NIMALKA R. WICKRAMASEKERA, ESQ.
`
`14· · · · · · ·333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3800
`
`15· · · · · · ·Los Angeles, California 90071-1543
`
`16· · · · · · ·nwickramasekera@winston.com
`
`17
`
`18· ·Also Present:
`
`19· · · · · · ·Tyson Marshall
`
`20· ·Videographer:
`
`21· · · · · · ·Craig Ellingson
`
`22· · · · · · ·Collette Stark
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`· · ·Exhibit 13· · Document Bates stamped ATEC_LLIF· ·258
`
`·8· · · · · · · · ·000745897 to 745926
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`2 to 5
`
`YVer1f
`
`EXHIBIT 28 - PAGE 414
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307-29 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.30089 Page 4 of 6
`
`Scott Robinson· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`Scott Robinson· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`October 29, 2019
`October 29, 2019
`
`·1· · ·SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA; TUESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2019
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · · · · ·9:18 a.m.
`
`·3· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· We are on the record
`
`·4· ·at 9:18 a.m. on October 29, 2019.· Audio and video
`
`·5· ·recording will continue to take place until all
`
`·6· ·parties agree to go off the record.· Please note
`
`·7· ·that microphones are sensitive and may pick up
`
`·8· ·whispering and private conversations.
`
`·9· · · · · · ·This is the video-recorded deposition of
`
`10· ·Scott Robinson taken by counsel for the plaintiff
`
`11· ·in the matter of Nuvasive, Inc., a Delaware
`
`12· ·corporation versus Alphatec Holdings, et al., filed
`
`13· ·in the United States District Court, Southern
`
`14· ·District of California, San Diego division.
`
`15· · · · · · ·This deposition is being held at Wilson,
`
`16· ·Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, located at 12235 El
`
`17· ·Camino Real, San Diego, California 92130.· My name
`
`18· ·is Craig Ellingson.· I'm the videographer on behalf
`
`19· ·of U.S. Legal Support, located at 1230 Columbia
`
`20· ·Street, Suite 400, San Diego, California 92101.
`
`21· · · · · · ·The court reporter is Patricia Schuler,
`
`22· ·on behalf of U.S. Legal Support.· I am not related
`
`23· ·to any party in this action nor am I financially
`
`24· ·interested in the outcome.
`
`25· · · · · · ·Counsel will state their appearances for
`
`Page 6
`
`Page 8
`·1· · · · A.· ·712 Apple Ridge, Encinitas, California
`·2· ·92024.
`·3· · · · Q.· ·Who is your current employer?
`·4· · · · A.· ·Alphatec Spine.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·How long have you been employed there?
`·6· · · · A.· ·Since March of 2010; going on 10 years.
`·7· · · · Q.· ·Mr. Robinson, have you ever had your
`·8· ·deposition taken before?
`·9· · · · A.· ·No.· This is the first.
`10· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· So I am just going to go over a
`11· ·few ground rules so we're on the same page.
`12· · · · · · ·Do you understand when I ask you a
`13· ·question, you need to give me a verbal answer?
`14· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`15· · · · Q.· ·If you don't understand my question,
`16· ·would you please let me know?
`17· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`18· · · · Q.· ·And if you do answer my question, do you
`19· ·understand that I am going to take that as meaning
`20· ·that you understood the question that I was asking?
`21· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`22· · · · Q.· ·Do you understand that you are providing
`23· ·testimony under oath today?
`24· · · · A.· ·I understand I am presenting testimony on
`25· ·nonprivileged information in the topics outlined.
`
`Page 7
`·1· ·the record, after which the court reporter will
`·2· ·swear in the witness.
`·3· · · · · · ·MS. DEVINE:· Wendy Devine from Wilson,
`·4· ·Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati on behalf of Nuvasive,
`·5· ·Inc.· With me are my co-counsel Christina Dashe and
`·6· ·Paul Tripod of the same firm.
`·7· · · · · · ·MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:· Nimalka
`·8· ·Wickramasekera from Winston Strawn on behalf of the
`·9· ·witness, the defendants.· And with me is Tyson
`10· ·Marshall, vice president and associate general
`11· ·counsel of Alphatec.
`12
`13· · · · · · · · · · · SCOTT ROBINSON,
`14· · having been administered an oath, was examined and
`15· · · · · · · · · ·testified as follows:
`16
`17· · · · · · · · · · · · EXAMINATION
`18· ·BY MS. DEVINE:
`19· · · · Q.· ·Good morning, Mr. Robinson.
`20· · · · A.· ·Hello.
`21· · · · Q.· ·Would you please state and spell your
`22· ·name for the record.
`23· · · · A.· ·Scott Robinson.· S-c-o-t-t,
`24· ·R-o-b-i-n-s-o-n.
`25· · · · Q.· ·And what is your current address?
`
`Page 9
`·1· · · · Q.· ·Do you understand that you are under oath
`·2· ·today as you testify, as you would be if you were
`·3· ·testifying in a court of law?
`·4· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·And do you understand that I am entitled
`·6· ·to complete and truthful answers to the best of
`·7· ·your recollection?
`·8· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·9· · · · Q.· ·Is there any reason, Mr. Robinson, that
`10· ·you cannot give your most truthful, accurate and
`11· ·complete testimony today?
`12· · · · A.· ·No.
`13· · · · Q.· ·Could you please tell me, Mr. Robinson,
`14· ·how you prepared for your deposition?
`15· · · · A.· ·There were a lot of documents.· The
`16· ·complaint was reviewed.· There were internal and
`17· ·external marketing documents that were produced by
`18· ·Alphatec.· There was a design history file.· There
`19· ·were, you know, as many documents related to this
`20· ·case as were made available.
`21· · · · Q.· ·Did you choose any of the documents that
`22· ·you reviewed to prepare for your deposition?
`23· · · · A.· ·I am not sure I understand the question.
`24· · · · Q.· ·Sure.· So when you reviewed documents to
`25· ·prepare for your deposition, did you go out and
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`6 to 9
`
`YVer1f
`
`EXHIBIT 28 - PAGE 415
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307-29 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.30090 Page 5 of 6
`
`Scott Robinson· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`Scott Robinson· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`October 29, 2019
`October 29, 2019
`
`Page 190
`·1· ·at our change control history to understand the
`·2· ·nature and number of changes.
`·3· ·BY MS. DEVINE:
`·4· · · · Q.· ·Okay.· Let's turn the page to the one
`·5· ·that is Bates labeled 1448.
`·6· · · · · · ·Do you see the preface section here?
`·7· · · · A.· ·I do.
`·8· · · · Q.· ·What is the purpose of the preface
`·9· ·section?
`10· · · · A.· ·I would imagine, just like a preface of a
`11· ·book, it describes in very general terms what is --
`12· ·what is contained within the system.
`13· · · · Q.· ·Do you see in the first paragraph -- one,
`14· ·two, three lines down -- there is a sentence that
`15· ·begins "The system"?
`16· · · · A.· ·Um-hmm.
`17· · · · Q.· ·And it reads, "The system features a
`18· ·three-bladed retractor system combined with broad
`19· ·disk prep and implant offerings."
`20· · · · · · ·Did I read that correctly?
`21· · · · A.· ·I believe so, yes.
`22· · · · Q.· ·Would you agree that the Battalion
`23· ·features a three-blade retractor system?
`24· · · · A.· ·A three-blade retractor system is part of
`25· ·the Battalion.
`
`Page 192
`·1· ·labeled 14449, do you see Section 1, Preoperative
`·2· ·Planning?
`·3· · · · A.· ·I do.
`·4· · · · Q.· ·And that section reads, "The Squadron
`·5· ·Retractor Lateral Access System has been designed
`·6· ·to allow for the use of neuromonitoring based on
`·7· ·the surgeon's discretion, and may be used with many
`·8· ·commercially available neuromonitoring systems."
`·9· · · · · · ·Did I read that correctly?
`10· · · · A.· ·I believe so, yes.
`11· · · · Q.· ·Is that a truthful and accurate
`12· ·statement?
`13· · · · · · ·MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:· Outside the scope.
`14· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I believe it's a truthful
`15· ·and accurate statement, yes.
`16· ·BY MS. DEVINE:
`17· · · · Q.· ·And just generally to the best your
`18· ·knowledge, are there any statements in Exhibit 8
`19· ·that are not truthful and accurate?
`20· · · · A.· ·Without reading through it verbatim, I
`21· ·don't remember it word for word, I think that I
`22· ·should generally be in agreement with everything
`23· ·that is stated in the document.
`24· · · · Q.· ·Can you turn to the page that's Bates
`25· ·labeled 14450, and it goes on to the next page,
`
`Page 191
`·1· · · · Q.· ·And does Alphatec consider the fact that
`·2· ·it is a three-bladed retractor to be a key feature
`·3· ·of the Battalion?
`·4· · · · · · ·MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:· Objection.· Outside
`·5· ·the scope.· Vague.
`·6· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I think it is just -- it's
`·7· ·a description.· It is a -- it's just a description
`·8· ·of one instrument within that system.
`·9· ·BY MS. DEVINE:
`10· · · · Q.· ·Did Alphatec consider making the
`11· ·Battalion Squadron retractor two-bladed?
`12· · · · A.· ·There were talks about a two-bladed
`13· ·system, three-bladed system, and four-bladed
`14· ·system.
`15· · · · Q.· ·Why did Alphatec choose a three-bladed
`16· ·system?
`17· · · · A.· ·I mean, there were a lot of three-blade
`18· ·systems on the market.· The surgeons who were part
`19· ·of our design team offered the most feedback on --
`20· ·well, they offered feedback on their experience,
`21· ·and a lot of their experience was based off of a
`22· ·three-blade system, so they seemed -- you know,
`23· ·they had the most commentary on a three-bladed
`24· ·system.
`25· · · · Q.· ·If we go to the next page that's Bates
`
`Page 193
`·1· ·14451.· There's a discussion of retro peritoneal
`·2· ·access.
`·3· · · · · · ·Do you see that?
`·4· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`·5· · · · Q.· ·Is this consistent with what we discussed
`·6· ·earlier with the surgeon using his or her finger to
`·7· ·navigate the muscles and other tissue down to the
`·8· ·surface of the psoas?
`·9· · · · A.· ·I believe so, yes.
`10· · · · Q.· ·And if you look over on Page 14451, there
`11· ·is a blowup of the dilator.
`12· · · · · · ·Do you see that?
`13· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`14· · · · Q.· ·And do you see it states, "Black lines
`15· ·and silver triangle indicate orientation"?
`16· · · · A.· ·Um-hmm.
`17· · · · Q.· ·And is that consistent with what we
`18· ·discussed earlier about the triangles and lines on
`19· ·Alphatec's dilators?
`20· · · · · · ·MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:· Objection.· Vague.
`21· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I believe it is, yes.
`22· ·BY MS. DEVINE:
`23· · · · Q.· ·If you go to the next page, 14452, there
`24· ·is a section on traversing the psoas that discusses
`25· ·advancing -- strike that.
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com 190 to 193
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com
`
`YVer1f
`
`EXHIBIT 28 - PAGE 416
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307-29 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.30091 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`Scott Robinson· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes OnlyScott Robinson· Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
`
`October 29, 2019October 29, 2019
`
`Page 266
`·1· · · · · · ·MS. WICKRAMASEKERA:· I have nothing.
`·2· ·Thank you for your time.
`·3· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Great.· Thank you.
`·4· · · · · · ·THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Off the record.· The
`·5· ·time is 6:27 p.m.
`·6· · · · · · ·(The videotaped deposition of
`·7· · · · · · ·SCOTT ROBINSON concluded at 6:27 p.m.)
`·8
`·9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`·1· · · · · · ·I, PATRICIA Y. SCHULER, a Certified
`
`·2· ·Shorthand Reporter of the State of California, do
`
`·3· ·hereby certify:
`
`Page 268
`
`·4· · · · · · ·That the foregoing proceedings were taken
`
`·5· ·before me at the time and place herein set forth;
`
`·6· ·that any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings,
`
`·7· ·prior to testifying, were duly sworn; that a
`
`·8· ·verbatim record of the proceedings was made by me
`
`·9· ·using machine shorthand which was thereafter
`
`10· ·transcribed under my direction; that the foregoing
`
`11· ·transcript is a true record of the testimony given.
`
`12· · · · · · ·Further, that if the foregoing pertains
`
`13· ·to the original transcript of a deposition in a
`
`14· ·Federal Case, before completion of the proceedings,
`
`15· ·review of the transcript [X] was [ ] was not
`
`16· ·requested.
`
`17· · · · · · ·I further certify I am neither
`
`18· ·financially interested in the action nor a relative
`
`19· ·or employee of any attorney of party to this
`
`20· ·action.
`
`21· · · · · · ·IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date
`
`22· ·subscribed my name.
`
`23· ·Dated:· October 29, 2019
`
`24· · · · · · · · · · · · · _________________________
`
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · PATRICIA Y. SCHULER
`
`25· · · · · · · · · · · · · CSR NO. 11949
`
`·1
`
`·2
`
`·3
`
`·4
`
`·5
`
`·6
`
`·7
`
`·8
`
`Page 267
`
`Page 269
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · DEPOSITION ERRATA SHEET
`
`·2· ·CASE NAME:· NUVASIVE, INC., v. ALPHATEC HOLDINGS
`
`· · ·DEPOSITION DATE:· OCTOBER 29, 2019
`
`·3· ·WITNESS NAME:· · ·SCOTT ROBINSON
`
`·4· ·Reason Codes:· 1. To clarify the record.
`
`·5· · · · · · · · · 2. To conform to the facts.
`
`·9· ·I, SCOTT ROBINSON, do hereby declare under the
`
`10· ·penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing
`
`11· ·transcript; that I have made any corrections as
`
`12· ·appear noted, in ink, initialed by me, or attached
`
`13· ·hereto; that my testimony as contained herein, as
`
`14· ·corrected, is true and correct.
`
`15· · · · EXECUTED this _____ day of _________________,
`
`16· ·20____, at _____________________, _______________.
`
`17· · · · · · · · · · · (City)· · · · · · · · (State)
`
`18
`
`19· · · · · · · · · · · · ____________________________
`
`20· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · SCOTT ROBINSON
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · 3. To correct transcription errors.
`
`·7· ·Page _____ Line ______ Reason Code ______
`
`·8· ·From _______________________ to ____________________
`
`·9· ·Page _____ Line ______ Reason Code ______
`
`10· ·From _______________________ to ____________________
`
`11· ·Page _____ Line ______ Reason Code ______
`
`12· ·From _______________________ to ____________________
`
`13· ·Page _____ Line ______ Reason Code ______
`
`14· ·From _______________________ to ____________________
`
`15· ·Page _____ Line ______ Reason Code ______
`
`16· ·From _______________________ to ____________________
`
`17· ·Page _____ Line ______ Reason Code ______
`
`18· ·From _______________________ to ____________________
`
`19· ·Page _____ Line ______ Reason Code ______
`
`20· ·From _______________________ to ____________________
`
`21· ·Page _____ Line ______ Reason Code ______
`
`22· ·From _______________________ to ____________________
`
`23· ·Page _____ Line ______ Reason Code ______
`
`24· ·From _______________________ to ____________________
`
`25· ·Page _____ Line ______ Reason Code ______
`
`
`
`U.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.comU.S. Legal Support | www.uslegalsupport.com 266 to 269
`
`EXHIBIT 28 - PAGE 417
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket