throbber
Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.29636 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`NIMALKA R. WICKRAMASEKERA (SBN: 268518)
`nwickramasekera@winston.com
`DAVID P. DALKE (SBN: 218161)
`ddalke@winston.com
`LEV TSUKERMAN (SBN: 319184)
`ltsukerman@winston.com
`WILLIAM M. WARDLAW (SBN: 328555)
`wwardlaw@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 S. Grand Avenue
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
`Telephone: (213) 615-1700
`Facsimile: (213) 615-1750
`
`GEORGE C. LOMBARDI (pro hac vice)
`glombardi@winston.com
`BRIAN J. NISBET (pro hac vice)
`bnisbet@winston.com
`SARANYA RAGHAVAN (pro hac vice)
`sraghavan@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601-9703
`Telephone: (312) 558-5600
`Facsimile: (312) 558-5700
`
`CORINNE STONE HOCKMAN (pro hac vice)
`chockman@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`800 Capitol Street, Suite 2400
`Houston, TX 77002-2529
`Telephone: (713) 651-2600
`Facsimile: (713) 651-2700
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC. AND ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN DIEGO DIVISION
`Case No. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`NUVASIVE, INC., a Delaware
`corporation,
`
`[Assigned to Courtroom 4C – Honorable
`
`Cathy Ann Bencivengo]
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`DECLARATION OF BRIAN J.
`v.
`NISBET IN SUPPORT OF
`
`DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., a
`NUVASIVE’S MOTION FOR
`Delaware corporation and ALPHATEC
`PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`SPINE, INC., a California corporation,
`AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`NISBET DECL. ISO DEFENDANTS’ OPP. TO NUVASIVE’S
`
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.29637 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`I, Brian J. Nisbet, declare as follows:
`
`I am a partner with the law firm of Winston & Strawn LLP, counsel of
`1.
`record for defendants Alphatec Holdings, Inc. and Alphatec Spine, Inc. (individually
`and collectively, “Alphatec”). I have personal knowledge of the following facts and, if
`called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto.
`Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the pages Bates stamped
`2.
`NUVA_ATEC0252170 through NUVA_ATEC0252175.
`Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the pages Bates stamped
`3.
`NUVA_ATEC0251803 through NUVA_ ATEC0251807.
`Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent Application No.
`4.
`11/093,409 bearing Bates numbers NUVA_ATEC0020856 through NUVA_
`ATEC0020910.
`Exhibit 4 is a true and correct excerpt of the Patent Owner Preliminary
`5.
`Response Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.107 filed on April 17, 2019 in IPR2019-00361.
`Exhibit 5 is a true and correct excerpt of the transcript of the November 4,
`6.
`2020 deposition of Scott Robinson.
`Exhibit 6 is a true and correct excerpt of the December 18, 2020 Rebuttal
`7.
`Report of Barton L. Sachs, M.D.
`Exhibit 7 is a true and correct excerpt of the November 20, 2020 Corrected
`8.
`Opening Expert Report of Jim Youssef, M.D. Regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,361,156
`(’156 Patent) and 8,187,334 (’334 Patent).
`Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of Appellant’s Principal Brief filed in
`9.
`case no. 20-2245 pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
`Circuit.
`10. Exhibit 9 is a true and correct excerpt of the November 20, 2020 Opening
`Report of Barton L. Sachs, M.D.
`
`11. Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of the document marked as Exhibit 9
`
`
`at the January 11, 2021 deposition of Barton L. Sachs, M.D.
`
`-1-
`
`NISBET DECL. ISO DEFENDANTS’ OPP. TO NUVASIVE’S
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.29638 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`12. Exhibit 11 is a true and correct excerpt of the transcript of the January 11,
`
`2021 deposition of Barton L. Sachs, M.D.
`13. Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of United States Patent Application
`Publication 2003/0028249 A1 (Baccelli et al.).
`14. Exhibit 13 is a true and correct excerpt from The American Heritage
`Dictionary (Second College Edition 1991).
`15. Exhibit 14 is a true and correct excerpt from The Concise Oxford
`Dictionary of Current English (Ninth Edition 1995).
`16. Exhibit 15 is a true and correct excerpt from the Merriam-Webster’s
`Collegiate Dictionary (Tenth Edition 2002).
`17. Exhibit 16 is a true and correct excerpt of the transcript of the October 30,
`2020 deposition of Mike Aleali.
`18. Exhibit 17 is a true and correct copy of the pages Bates stamped
`ATEC_LLIF000001842 through ATEC_LLIF000001846.
`19. Exhibit 18 is a true and correct excerpt of the December 18, 2020 Rebuttal
`Expert Report of Jim Youssef, M.D.
`20. Exhibit 19 is a true and correct copy of Defendants’ September 18, 2020
`Response to Plaintiff NuVasive, Inc.’s Fifth Set of Interrogatories (No. 23).
`21. Exhibit 20 is a true and correct excerpt of Defendants’ September 18, 2020
`Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff NuVasive, Inc.’s Interrogatories (Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7,
`8, and 17).
`22. Exhibit 21 is a true and correct excerpt of Defendants’ November 3, 2020
`Amended Response to Plaintiff NuVasive, Inc.’s Fifth Set of Interrogatories (No. 23).
`23. Exhibit 22 is a true and correct excerpt of Defendants’ November 6, 2020
`Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff NuVasive, Inc.’s Interrogatories (Nos. 2, 7, 11 and
`17).
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`NISBET DECL. ISO DEFENDANTS’ OPP. TO NUVASIVE’S
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.29639 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`24. Exhibit 23 is a true and correct excerpt of Defendants’ October 26, 2020
`
`Responses and Objections to NuVasive, Inc.’s Third Amended Notice of Deposition of
`Alphatec Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6).
`25. Exhibit 24 is a true and correct copy of an email exchange between
`Defendants’ counsel and Plaintiff’s counsel on October 25, 2020.
`26. Exhibit 25 is a true and correct excerpt of the transcript of the January 12,
`2021 deposition of Keith R. Ugone, Ph.D.
`27. Exhibit 26 is a true and correct excerpt of the transcript of the January 13,
`2021 deposition of Jim Youssef, M.D.
`28. Exhibit 27 is a true and correct excerpt of the transcript of the January 18,
`2021 deposition of Blake Inglish.
`29. Exhibit 28 is a true and correct excerpt of the transcript of the October 29,
`2019 deposition of Scott Robinson.
`30. Exhibit 29 is a true and correct excerpt of the transcript of the December
`19, 2019 deposition of Mike Aleali.
`31. Exhibit 30 is a true and correct copy of NuVasive, Inc.’s January 14, 2020
`Amended Second Notice of Deposition of Alphatec Holdings, Inc. and Alphatec Spine,
`Inc. Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6).
`32. Exhibit 31 is a true and correct excerpt of the transcript of the January 15,
`2020 deposition of Frank Chang.
`33. Exhibit 32 is a true and correct excerpt of the November 22, 2019 Rebuttal
`Report of Barton L. Sachs, M.D.
`34. Exhibit 33 is a true and correct excerpt of the December 18, 2020
`Supplemental Rebuttal Expert Report of Keith R. Ugone, Ph.D.
`35. Exhibit 34 is a true and correct excerpt of the November 20, 2020
`Supplemental Expert Report of Blake Inglish.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`NISBET DECL. ISO DEFENDANTS’ OPP. TO NUVASIVE’S
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.29640 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and
`
`the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 16th
`day of February 2021, at Chicago, Illinois.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian J. Nisbet
`BRIAN J. NISBET
`TABLE OF EXHIBITS
`
`Page Nos.
`1-6
`7-11
`12-66
`67-77
`78-85
`86-134
`135-144
`145-221
`222-276
`277
`278-288
`289-296
`297-300
`301-303
`304-307
`308-319
`320-324
`325-337
`338-348
`349-363
`364-375
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Exhibit
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`NISBET DECL. ISO DEFENDANTS’ OPP. TO NUVASIVE’S
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 307 Filed 02/16/21 PageID.29641 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`376-385
`386-393
`394-395
`396-403
`404-408
`409-412
`413-417
`418-422
`423-433
`434-447
`448-451
`452-460
`461-463
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-5-
`
`NISBET DECL. ISO DEFENDANTS’ OPP. TO NUVASIVE’S
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`
`
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`29
`30
`31
`32
`33
`34
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket