throbber
Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 300-1 Filed 01/08/21 PageID.26933 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`NIMALKA R. WICKRAMASEKERA (SBN: 268518)
`nwickramasekera@winston.com
`DAVID P. DALKE (SBN: 218161)
`ddalke@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 S. Grand Avenue
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543
`Telephone: (213) 615-1700
`Facsimile: (213) 615-1750
`
`GEORGE C. LOMBARDI (pro hac vice)
`glombardi@winston.com
`BRIAN J. NISBET (pro hac vice)
`bnisbet@winston.com
`SARANYA RAGHAVAN (pro hac vice)
`sraghavan@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601-9703
`Telephone: (312) 558-5600
`Facsimile: (312) 558-5700
`
`CORINNE STONE HOCKMAN (pro hac vice)
`chockman@winston.com
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`800 Capitol Street, Suite 2400
`Houston, TX 77002-2529
`Telephone: (713) 651-2600
`Facsimile: (713) 651-2700
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC. AND ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN DIEGO DIVISION
`Case No. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`NUVASIVE, INC., a Delaware
`corporation,
`
`[Assigned to Courtroom 4C – Honorable
`
`Cathy Ann Bencivengo]
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`DECLARATION OF BRIAN J.
`v.
`NISBET IN SUPPORT OF
`
`ALPHATEC’S OPPOSITION TO
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., a
`MOTION TO STRIKE
`Delaware corporation and ALPHATEC
`
`SPINE, INC., a California corporation,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF BRIAN J. NISBET ISO ALPHATEC’S
`
`OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 300-1 Filed 01/08/21 PageID.26934 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`I, Brian J. Nisbet, declare as follows:
`I am a partner with the law firm of Winston & Strawn LLP, counsel of
`1.
`record for defendants Alphatec Holdings, Inc. and Alphatec Spine, Inc. (individually
`and collectively, “Alphatec”). I have personal knowledge of the following facts and, if
`called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto.
`Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the pages Bates numbered NUVA_
`2.
`ATEC0115139–153.
`Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the pages Bates numbered
`3.
`NUVA_ATEC0338292–294.
`Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the page Bates numbered
`4.
`NUVA_ATEC0340873.
`Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the pages Bates numbered
`5.
`NUVA_ATEC0341150–153.
`Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the page Bates numbered
`6.
`NUVA_ATEC0341168.
`Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of the pages Bates numbered
`7.
`NUVA_ATEC0341176–177.
`Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of the pages Bates numbered
`8.
`NUVA_ATEC0341182–183.
`Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of the pages Bates numbered
`9.
`NUVA_ATEC0341357–358.
`10. Exhibit 9 is a true and correct excerpt (without exhibits) of Alphatec’s
`October 30, 2018 preliminary invalidity contentions for U.S. patent nos. 9,924,859;
`9,974,531; and 8,187,334.
`11. Exhibit 10 is a true and correct excerpt (without exhibits) of Alphatec’s
`December 7, 2018 amended invalidity contentions for U.S. patent nos. 7,819,801;
`8,355,780; 8,439,832; 9,833,227; 8,753,270; and 8,361,156.
`
`DECLARATION OF BRIAN J. NISBET ISO ALPHATEC’S
`
`OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE
`
`1
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 300-1 Filed 01/08/21 PageID.26935 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`12. Exhibit 11 is a true and correct excerpt (without exhibits) of Alphatec’s
`January 15, 2019 supplemental amended invalidity contentions for U.S. patent nos.
`7,819,801; 8,355,780; 8,439,832; 9,833,227; 8,753,270; and 8,361,156.
`13. Exhibit 12 is a true and correct excerpt (without exhibits) of Alphatec’s
`January 16, 2019 amended invalidity contentions for U.S. patent nos. 9,924,859;
`9,974,531; and 8,187,334.
`14. Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy (without exhibits) of Alphatec’s
`November 12, 2020 final invalidity contentions for U.S. patent nos. 8,361,156; and
`8,187,334.
`15. Exhibit 14 is a true and correct excerpt of NuVasive’s September 4, 2018
`responses to Alphatec’s first set of interrogatories (nos. 1–12).
`16. Exhibit 15 is a true and correct excerpt of NuVasive’s November 2, 2018
`supplemental responses to Alphatec’s second set of interrogatories (nos. 13–15).
`17. Exhibit 16 is a true and correct excerpt of NuVasive’s September 18, 2020
`supplemental responses to Alphatec’s interrogatory nos. 1–7 and 9–16.
`18. Exhibit 17 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated September 28, 2020
`that I wrote to NuVasive’s counsel.
`19. Exhibit 18 is a true and correct excerpt of NuVasive’s October 16, 2020
`fourth supplemental responses to Alphatec’s interrogatory nos. 3 and 13.
`20. Exhibit 19 is a true and correct highlighted copy of an email exchange
`between Alphatec’s counsel and NuVasive’s counsel between October 12, 2020 and
`November 10, 2020.
`21. Exhibit 20 is a true and correct highlighted copy of an email exchange
`between Alphatec’s counsel and NuVasive’s counsel between October 26, 2020 and
`November 6, 2020.
`22. Exhibit 21 is a true and correct excerpt of the transcript for the November
`6, 2020 deposition of Ryan Donahoe.
`
`DECLARATION OF BRIAN J. NISBET ISO ALPHATEC’S
`
`OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE
`
`2
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 300-1 Filed 01/08/21 PageID.26936 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`23. Exhibit 22 is a true and correct excerpt (without exhibits) of Dr. Youssef’s
`December 18, 2020 rebuttal expert report.
`24. Exhibit 23 is a true and correct excerpt of NuVasive’s October 22, 2018
`supplemental responses to Alphatec’s first set of interrogatories (nos. 1, 4, 8, 10, and
`11).
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and
`the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 8th
`day of January 2021, at Chicago, Illinois.
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Brian J. Nisbet
`BRIAN J. NISBET
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF BRIAN J. NISBET ISO ALPHATEC’S
`
`OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE
`
`3
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 300-1 Filed 01/08/21 PageID.26937 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Exhibit
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`
`TABLE OF EXHIBITS
`
`
`Page Nos.
`1–16
`17–20
`21–22
`23–29
`30–32
`33–53
`54–74
`75–78
`79–90
`91–103
`104–117
`118–130
`131–160
`161–168
`169–185
`186–213
`214–223
`224–249
`250–253
`254–259
`260–285
`286–294
`295–305
`
`
`
`4
`
`DECLARATION OF BRIAN J. NISBET ISO ALPHATEC’S
`
`OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 3:18-CV-00347-CAB-MDD
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket