throbber
Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 253-15 Filed 01/18/20 PageID.22687 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 15
`
`
`TO THE DECLARATION OF BRIAN J. NISBET
`IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
`FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
`ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 253-15 Filed 01/18/20 PageID.22688 Page 2 of 6
`
`1"'")(cid:173)
`~
`Scripps
`
`Scripps Memorial Hospital
`Encinitas
`
`OPERATIVE REPORT
`
`NAME:
`Date of Operation: 02/14/2017
`Diet Phys:
`NEVILLE ALLEYNE, MD
`Date of Birth:
`
`MED REC#:
`Room:
`Account#:
`
`-EE2W 2105/A
`
`SURGEON:
`Neville Alleyne, MD
`
`PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
`L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and LS-SI lumbar spinal stenosis with instability and scoliosis.
`
`POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:
`L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and LS-SI lumbar spinal stenosis with instability and scoliosis.
`
`PROCEDURE PERFORMED:
`Part 1: XLIF L2-3, L3-4, L4-5.
`
`ASSISTANT:
`Tommy D Hammonds, PA.
`
`ANESTHESIA:
`General endotracheal anesthesia.
`
`ANESTHESIOLOGIST:
`Dr. Ladan Farhoomandi, MD.
`
`Somatosensory motor evoked potentials being performed by Ms. Christina Brady.
`
`PROCEDURE IN DETAIL:
`The patient brought to the operating room, supine position. After successful general endotracheal
`anesthesia. Central line, A-line, Foley catheter, Venodyne boots, and somatosensory motor evoked
`potentials were placed. The patient was then meticulously placed onto the operating table in a lateral
`decubitus position with the right side up. All bony prominences well padded. Axillary roll was placed and
`the patient was then positioned for an XLIF and taped into position with a blanket roll on the anterior
`portion and posterior portion to keep her aligned. The bed was then flexed and appropriate AP and lateral
`x-rays were taken with fluoroscopy to obtain good end plates. Next the anterior longitudinal ligament,
`posterior longitudinal ligament, the 30 yard line and trajectory path were then marked at L4-5, L3-4, and
`L2-3. The wound was then prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion. The subcutaneous tissue was then
`infiltrated with 10 cc of Marcaine with epi. Incision was carried down through the skin down to the
`subcutaneous tissue. The fascia was then entered at L4-5 by using the Metz, blunt dissection down to the
`psoas. The surgeon's hand was then used to sweep and palpate the iliac crest, the TP as well as the disc
`space. The 1st dilator was placed and the thresholds were then checked and noted to be stable
`circumferentially, K-wire was then placed into the L4-5 30-yard line, followed by 2nd dilator which was
`tested and the retractor blades were then placed over the 2nd dilator and the lights were then inserted. The
`
`OPERATIVE REPORT
`Page 1 of 3
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS'
`EYES ONLY
`
`ALLEYNE000013
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 253-15 Filed 01/18/20 PageID.22689 Page 3 of 6
`
`Squadron retractor was then opened and locked into position and secured with the bed mount. This was
`followed by the placement of the shim under AP fluoro at L4-5 followed by an annulotomy that was made
`after the K-wire and the dilators were removed and the floor of the disk space was then tested
`circumferentially for any thresholds. 15 blade was used to make a rectangular incision in to the anulus on
`the right side followed by pituitary rongeur to remove disc material and annular debris followed by the 4, 6,
`and 8 trial which were inspected under AP and lateral fluoro, the 8 trial was then used, we used an 8 x 18 x
`55 trial filled with DBM putty and BMP prior to placing are cage, the endplates were then scraped with the
`scrapper followed by the rasp. Pituitary rongeur was used to remove any further disc material and annular
`debris. The wound was then irrigated and suction dried and are 8 x 18 x 55 cage was then impacted with
`the impactor mallet. Intraoperative lateral x-ray continued our position. Because of the spondylolisthesis,
`care was taken to make sure where our posterior markers were, they were in good position and reduction of
`the spondylolisthesis was noted.
`
`At L3-4 in the similar fashion, through the same opening the 1st dilator was placed and checked
`for threshold, K-wire was then placed at the 30 yard line and the 2nd dilator circumferentially
`tested and the retractor blades were then inserted. Once this was accomplished, the light was then
`turned on and the dilators were opened up with a Squadron retractor which was then locked to the
`bed mount and secured after the Squadron retractor blades were opened. The floor of the disc space
`was then tested and noted to have adequate threshold. The shim was then placed uneventfully
`followed by the annulotomy at L3-4 followed by pituitary rongeur to remove disc material and
`annular debris, followed by the 4, 6, 8, and 10 trials. The 10 x 18 x 55 trial was felt to be snug.
`Once this was removed and checked under AP and lateral fluoro, it was noted be in good position.
`This was followed by the scraper rasp disc space irrigation and the implant was then placed from
`Alphatec using the ____ impacted with the impactor mallet noted to be in good position and
`our attention was then taken to L2-3. In a similar fashion, at L2-3 through a separate incision
`skin incision was made. Subcutaneous tissue was visualized followed by the blunt dissection using
`the Metzenbaum scissors to the psoas at L2-3. The first dilator was placed and thresholds were
`tested, noted be adequate, K-wire was then introduced into the L2-3 disk space followed by the 2nd
`dilator which was checked circumferentially followed by the Squadron retractor blades being placed
`with the retractor uneventfully at L2-3 and opened after it was secured to the bed mount. Once this
`was accomplished, the 1st and 2nd dilators were removed, K-wire was left in place. The floor of the
`disc space was then tested circumferentially for adequate thresholds. The shim was then introduced
`at L2-3, secured, followed by the annulotomy which was done with a 15 blade followed by straight
`pituitary rongeur followed by the scraper and 4, 6, and 8 trials which were checked under AP and
`lateral fluoro, noted to have good threshold, once they were reintroduced, the 8 was felt to be
`adequate, we used an 8 x 18 x 50 filled with BMP and DBM putty. Impacted with the impactor mallet.
`Prior to doing this, the disc space at L2-3 was scraped, rasped, and further disc debris was
`removed followed by disc space irrigation and suctioning of that disk space. With the cage now in
`place L2-3 intraoperative AP and lateral fluoro confinned the position and orientation at all 3
`levels. The Floseal was then placed into each one of these openings and followed by lyophilized
`vancomycin. Fascia was closed with 1 Vicryl followed by the deep subcutaneous tissue with the 2-0
`Vicryl for both incisions. The incisions were then stapled. Dennabond and an Ioban dressing was
`then applied. Sponge and needle count were correct x2. The patient tolerated the procedure well. At
`no time were there any alterations in somatosensory and motor evoked potentials. Total blood loss
`
`OPERATIVE REPORT
`Page 2 of 3
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS'
`EYES ONLY
`
`ALLEYNE000014
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 253-15 Filed 01/18/20 PageID.22690 Page 4 of 6
`
`about 50 cc for ____ combined 3 levels and at no time were there any alterations in somatosensory
`or motor evoked potentials. The 2nd part will be dictated after the patient is ___ _
`
`NEVILLE ALLEYNE, MD
`
`NA
`D: 2017-02-14 10:58:00
`T: 02/14/2017 20:29:54
`C:
`20170214731339491
`Confirmation No.: 20366483
`
`DICTATED BY:NEVILLE ALLEYNE, MD
`
`OPERATIVE REPORT
`Page 3 of 3
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS'
`EYES ONLY
`
`ALLEYNE0000 15
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 253-15 Filed 01/18/20 PageID.22691 Page 5 of 6
`+use s1e.1saa
`Scripps CONFIDENTIAL If arror, call:
`p. 1/3
`2017/03/13 16:41
`t◄ l
`
`C>
`S ...
`... crtpps
`
`Scripps Memorial Hospital
`Encinitas
`
`OPERATIVE REPORT
`
`NAME:
`Date of Operation: 02/14/2017
`NEVILLE ALLEYNE. MD
`Diet Phys:
`Date of Birth:
`
`MED REC#:
`Room:
`Account#:
`
`EDISC -
`
`SURGEON:
`Neville Alleyne, MD
`
`PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:
`
`1. L2-L2, L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S 1 decompressive laminectomy.
`2. Bilateral medial facetectomies at L2 to S 1.
`3. Bilateral foraminotomies at L2 to Sl.
`4. K2M instrumentation TIO to S2.
`5. Bilateral lateral fusion at T9 to S2.
`
`ASSISTANT:
`Mr. Tommy Hammonds.
`
`ANESfflESIA:
`General endotracheal anesthesia.
`
`ANESfflESIOLOGIST:
`Dr. Ladan Farhoomand. Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials being performed by Ms. Christine
`Brady.
`
`PROCEDURE IN DETAIL:
`The patient was brought to the operating room, supine position after successful general endotracheal
`anesthesia. Foley catheter had already been in place. Central line and A-line were already in place. The
`patient was taken from an excellent position and positioned on the operating table in Jackson frame for the
`posterior procedure. Care was taken moving the cervical spines so as to not cause a cervical spine injwy.
`All bony prominences were well padded. The upper extremities at 90:90 with padding under the ax.ilia to
`prevent brachia! plexopathy. Final position was then approved by Anesthesia.
`
`The patient was then prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. The subcutaneous tissue from TIO to
`S2 was infiltrated with 1: 500,000 epinephrine solution. Incision was carried down to the fascia. Fascia was
`then incised down to the spinolaminar junction further dissection out to the tips of the transverse process
`was accomplished using a Cobb and electrocautery dissection. Next, the supraspinous and interspinous
`ligaments at _____ were then removed. Next, the pins were placed into the TS spinous process and
`one pin at the posterior superior iliac spine on the right and the other on the left. The _____ was then
`assembled and the Mazor Renaissance robot was then called for.
`
`With the assembly of the _ _ _ __ , the AP and oblique registrations were then taken in the thoracic and
`
`OPERATIVE REPORT
`Page 1 of 3
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS'
`EYES ONLY
`
`ALLEYNE000016
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 253-15 Filed 01/18/20 PageID.22692 Page 6 of 6
`p, 2/3
`[4]
`Scripp5 CONFIDENTIAL If error, call:
`+858 678.7500
`2017/03/13 16:41
`
`lumbar spine and sacral spine. After this was accomplished. the _____ had the robot attached and
`trajectories were then made from Tl O down to S2. Each screw was then drilled, tapped, and the screws
`were placed using the K2M instrumentation. The screws were pre-determined from our plan registration.
`With the screws now in placed, the decompression was then commenced.
`
`Using a _ _ ___ Smith-Peterson rongeur, the spinous process at L2. L3, L4, L5, and S1 were then
`removed, kept in _____ basin for later bone grafting. Redundant ligamentum flavum was then
`removed and bilateral partial medial facetectomies were then commenced using a high-speed on #3,
`#4, #5 _____ upbiting Kerrison rongeur followed by bilateral foraminotomies at L2, L3, IA, LS,
`and SI with #2 and #3 _____ Kerrison rongeur. The KW probe was then placed in the
`neuroforamen, it was without any impedance, and the wound was then irrigated with 3 L of bacitracin
`jet lavage. Once this was accomplished, the transverse process corresponding facet joints were then
`decorticated. Rods were then cut and contoured to a proper degree of sagittal contour. All screw
`heads were then tested and noted to have adequate _____ . Intraoperative AP and lateral x- ray
`was then taken to assess the alignment of our construct which appeared to be stable with adequate
`thresholds for all of our pedicle screws. The sagittal contour was then placed into the rods,
`engaged into the pedicle screws secured with interlocking nuts. The construct was then tightened to
`80 inch pounds of force with the corresponding distraction and compression done at the scoliotic
`level according to our plan. With the screws now all tightened, a cross connector was then placed
`in the thoracic spine and one in lumbar spine, secured. Gel-Foam was then placed over the dural
`tube after Ray-Tee sponge was removed. The Ray-Tee sponge was kept in place until bone graft was
`placed into the lateral gutter which started with the BMP, local bone. DBM putty and ___ _
`strips. Care was taken not to have any other bone graft material follow the exposed dural tube or
`nerve root sleeves to result in iatrogenic central or neural foraminal stenosis. After the Ray-Tee
`was removed, Gel-Foam was then applied over the dural tube. An 8-inch ConstaVac drain was brought
`through a separate stab incision. The wound was sprinkled with Lyophilized vancomycin. The deep
`fascia was then closed with #1 Vicryl. The subcutaneous tissue was then irrigated with another 3 L,
`sprinkled with Lyophilized vancomycin. The drain was also brought through a separate stab incision
`superolateral aspect of the wound on the right and closed with 2-0 Vicryl followed by the skin with
`skin staples. Dermabond sterile fluffs and ABD pad and Ioban dressing were then applied. The sponge
`
`OPERATIVE REPORT
`Page 2 of 3
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS'
`EYES ONLY
`
`ALLEYNE000017
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket