throbber
Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 167 Filed 03/20/19 PageID.17467 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`NUVASIVE, INC.,
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` Case No.: 3:18-CV-347-CAB-MDD
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
`
`
`ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC. et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`On March 20, 2019, the Court held a hearing to construe certain disputed terms and
`
`phrases of the patents at issue in this lawsuit. Having considered the submissions of the
`
`parties, the arguments of counsel, and for the reasons set forth at the hearing, the Court
`
`enters the claim constructions listed below.
`
`Claim Term
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`Court’s Construction
`
`rigidly coupled
`
`7,819,801
`
`fixed and immovably connected
`
`distraction assembly
`
`8,439,832
`
`collection or group of components that
`operate together to create a tissue
`distraction corridor
`
`slidably engageable
`
`8,355,780
`
`slides to contact
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1
`
`3:18-CV-347-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:18-cv-00347-CAB-MDD Document 167 Filed 03/20/19 PageID.17468 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`In addition the Court adopts the parties’ agreed upon constructions of the following
`
`terms:
`
`Claim Term
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`Construction
`
`plurality of sequential
`dilators
`
`7,819,801
`
`two or more sequential dilators
`
`trajectory
`
`9,833,227
`
`direction or path
`
`9,974,531
`
`two or more dilators
`
`9,974,531
`
`wherein when the first, second, and
`third retractor blades are adjacent to
`one another in the closed position
`such that the first, second, and third
`retractor blades abut one another
`
`plurality of dilators /
`plurality of sequential
`dilators
`
`Wherein the first,
`second, and third
`retractor blades are
`adjacent to one another
`in the closed position
`the first, second, and
`third retractor blades
`abut one another
`
`
`
`As for the term “lateral, transpoas path”, as used in many of the patents at issue
`
`in this case, the Court understands that the parties agree that it means “approach to the
`
`lumbar spine that (1) approaches from the patient's lateral aspect (or side); and (2) goes
`
`through the psoas muscle,” see In re NuVasive, Inc., 693 F. App’x 893, 900–01 (Fed. Cir.
`
`2017), but that the parties dispute whether this term is limiting. The Court takes this issue
`
`under submission and will issue a ruling in due course.
`
`It is SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: March 20, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`2
`
`3:18-CV-347-CAB-MDD
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket