`
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,
`MINTZ, LEVIN, CORN, FERRIS,
`GLOVSKYAND POPEO, P.C.
`GLOVSKYAND POPEO, P.C.
`Randy K. Jones, SBN 141711
`Randy K. Jones, SBN 141711
`3580 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300
`3580 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300
`San Diego, Ca 92130
`San Diego, Ca 92130
`Telephone: (858) 314-1510
`Telephone: (858) 314-1510
`Email: rkjones@mintz.com
`Email: rkjones@mintz.com
`
`Daniel Goodrich, BBO 692624 (Pro Hac)
`Daniel Goodrich, BBO 692624 (Pro Hac)
`Ryan Dougherty, BBO 703380 (Pro Hac)
`Ryan Dougherty, BBO 703380 (Pro Hac)
`One Financial Center
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`Boston, MA 02111
`Email: djgoodrich@mintz.com
`Email: djgoodrich@mintz.com
`rtdougherty@mintz.com
`rtdougherty@mintz.com
`
`Attorneys For Mark Manoogian
`Attorneys For Mark Manoogian
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`Plaintiff,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`v.
`JACOB BYCHAK, et al.,
`JACOB BYCHAK, et al.,
`Defendant.
`Defendant.
`
`CASE NO.: 18-CR-4683-GPC
`CASE NO.: 18-CR-4683-GPC
`The Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel
`The Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel
`DEFENDANT MARK
`DEFENDANT MARK
`MANOOGIAN’S UNOPPOSED
`MANOOGIAN'S UNOPPOSED
`MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING
`MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING
`TRAVEL REQUEST; ORDER
`TRAVEL REQUEST; ORDER
`
`Defendant Mark Manoogian, by and through counsel, Randy K. Jones, hereby
`Defendant Mark Manoogian, by and through counsel, Randy K. Jones, hereby
`submits this Unopposed Motion for an Order modifying Mr. Manoogian’s bond
`submits this Unopposed Motion for an Order modifying Mr. Manoogian's bond
`conditions, permitting him to travel to within the continental United States, so long
`conditions, permitting him to travel to within the continental United States, so long
`as Mr. Manoogian provides his Pretrial Services Officer with a copy of any planned
`as Mr. Manoogian provides his Pretrial Services Officer with a copy of any planned
`travel itinerary and calls Pretrial Services both prior to departure and upon his return.
`travel itinerary and calls Pretrial Services both prior to departure and upon his return.
`The basis for this Unopposed Motion is as follows:
`The basis for this Unopposed Motion is as follows:
`1
`1
`DEFENDANT MARK MANOOGIAN’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER TO TRAVEL
`DEFENDANT MARK MANOOGIAN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER TO TRAVEL
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 497 Filed 08/31/22 PageID.7419 Page 2 of 4
`
`On October 31, 2018, Mr. Manoogian and his co-defendants Jacob
`1.
`1.
`On October 31, 2018, Mr. Manoogian and his co-defendants Jacob
`Bychak, Mohammed Abdul Qayyum, and Petr Pacas were charged in a 10-count
`Bychak, Mohammed Abdul Qayyum, and Petr Pacas were charged in a 10-count
`Indictment for conspiracy to commit violations of the wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C.
`Indictment for conspiracy to commit violations of the wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C.
`§ 1343), and the CAN-SPAM Act (18 U.S.C. § 1037(a)(5)). ECF Dkt. No. 1.
`§ 1343), and the CAN-SPAM Act (18 U.S.C. § 1037(a)(5)). ECF Dkt. No. 1.
`2.
`On November 1, 2018, Mr. Manoogian was arraigned and released on
`On November 1, 2018, Mr. Manoogian was arraigned and released on
`2.
`a $50,000 appearance bond secured by his signature. ECF Dkt. Nos. 10, 16. Mr.
`a $50,000 appearance bond secured by his signature. ECF Dkt. Nos. 10, 16. Mr.
`Manoogian’s travel was restricted to San Diego County and the states of Arizona,
`Manoogian's travel was restricted to San Diego County and the states of Arizona,
`Massachusetts, and Rhode Island at the discretion of Pretrial Services and he was
`Massachusetts, and Rhode Island at the discretion of Pretrial Services and he was
`instructed not to travel to Mexico. ECF Dkt. No. 16.
`instructed not to travel to Mexico. ECF Dkt. No. 16.
`3.
`On May 23, 2022, the trial in this case began and, on June 10, 2022, the
`On May 23, 2022, the trial in this case began and, on June 10, 2022, the
`3.
`Court declared a mistrial. ECF Dkt. Nos. 443, 485.
`Court declared a mistrial. ECF Dkt. Nos. 443, 485.
`4.
`On June 10, 2022, Mr. Manoogian entered a guilty plea to Count 1 of
`On June 10, 2022, Mr. Manoogian entered a guilty plea to Count 1 of
`4.
`the Superseding Information, charging conspiracy to violate the CAN-SPAM Act,
`the Superseding Information, charging conspiracy to violate the CAN-SPAM Act,
`18 U.S.C. § 1037(a)(5), (b)(3) and a violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, 18 U.S.C. §
`18 U.S.C. § 1037(a)(5), (b)(3) and a violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, 18 U.S.C. §
`1037(a)(5), (b)(3), both misdemeanors. ECF Dkt. Nos. 481, 482.
`1037(a)(5), (b)(3), both misdemeanors. ECF Dkt. Nos. 481, 482.
`5.
`Mr. Manoogian’s sentencing hearing is set for October 3, 2022, at 10:30
`5. Mr. Manoogian's sentencing hearing is set for October 3, 2022, at 10:30
`a.m in Courtroom 2D before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. ECF Dkt. No. 481.
`a.m in Courtroom 2D before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. ECF Dkt. No. 481.
`6.
`Mr. Manoogian recently launched a new business and plans to attend a
`6. Mr. Manoogian recently launched a new business and plans to attend a
`trade show in Lafayette, Louisiana from October 16, 2022 through October 18, 2022,
`trade show in Lafayette, Louisiana from October 16, 2022 through October 18, 2022,
`to promote his business and to develop other business opportunities.
`to promote his business and to develop other business opportunities.
`7.
`Mr. Manoogian’s new business venture may require additional travel
`7. Mr. Manoogian's new business venture may require additional travel
`within the continental United States in the coming months to promote the business
`within the continental United States in the coming months to promote the business
`and to develop other opportunities.
`and to develop other opportunities.
`8.
`Mr. Manoogian plans to travel to his home state of Massachusetts along
`8. Mr. Manoogian plans to travel to his home state of Massachusetts along
`with his wife and children to visit family from November 11, 2022 through
`with his wife and children to visit family from November 11, 2022 through
`November 13, 2022. Under the conditions of his Pretrial Release Order, Mr.
`November 13, 2022. Under the conditions of his Pretrial Release Order, Mr.
`Manoogian is permitted to travel to Massachusetts without pre-approval from this
`Manoogian is permitted to travel to Massachusetts without pre-approval from this
`Court or his Pretrial Services Officer. ECF Dkt. No. 16. Time permitting during the
`Court or his Pretrial Services Officer. ECF Dkt. No. 16. Time permitting during the
`2
`2
`DEFENDANT MARK MANOOGIAN’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER TO TRAVEL
`DEFENDANT MARK MANOOGIAN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER TO TRAVEL
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 497 Filed 08/31/22 PageID.7420 Page 3 of 4
`
`trip, however, Mr. Manoogian and his family may also visit his sister, who lives in
`trip, however, Mr. Manoogian and his family may also visit his sister, who lives in
`New Jersey. As such, Mr. Manoogian requests permission to travel to New Jersey,
`New Jersey. As such, Mr. Manoogian requests permission to travel to New Jersey,
`and through Connecticut and New York on the way to New Jersey.
`and through Connecticut and New York on the way to New Jersey.
`9.
`Mr. Manoogian’s Pretrial Services Officer has no objection to these
`9. Mr. Manoogian's Pretrial Services Officer has no objection to these
`travel requests and defers to the Court. Further, Mr. Manoogian’s Pretrial Services
`travel requests and defers to the Court. Further, Mr. Manoogian's Pretrial Services
`Officer suggested that Mr. Manoogian request that the Court modify the conditions
`Officer suggested that Mr. Manoogian request that the Court modify the conditions
`of his release to allow travel within the continental United States, subject to the
`of his release to allow travel within the continental United States, subject to the
`discretion of Pretrial Services. Pretrial Services is not opposed to such modification.
`discretion of Pretrial Services. Pretrial Services is not opposed to such modification.
`10.
`The government has no objection to these specific travel requests or a
`10. The government has no objection to these specific travel requests or a
`modification to allow travel within the continental United States.
`modification to allow travel within the continental United States.
`
`Dated: August 31, 2022
`Dated: August 31, 2022
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Respectfully submitted,
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,
`MINTZ, LEVIN, CORN, FERRIS,
`GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`
`/s/ Randy K. Jones
`/s/ Randy K Jones
`Randy K. Jones
`Randy K. Jones
`Daniel J. Goodrich (Pro Hac)
`Daniel J. Goodrich (Pro Hac)
`Ryan Dougherty (Pro Hac)
`Ryan Dougherty (Pro Hac)
`Attorneys for Mark Manoogian
`Attorneys for Mark Manoogian
`
`3
`3
`DEFENDANT MARK MANOOGIAN’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER TO TRAVEL
`DEFENDANT MARK MANOOGIAN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER TO TRAVEL
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 497 Filed 08/31/22 PageID.7421 Page 4 of 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Counsel for the Defendant certifies that the foregoing pleading has been
`Counsel for the Defendant certifies that the foregoing pleading has been
`electronically served on the following parties by virtue of their registration with the
`electronically served on the following parties by virtue of their registration with the
`CM/ECF system:
`CM/ECF system:
`
`Melanie K. Pierson
`Melanie K. Pierson
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`880 Front Street, Rm 6293
`880 Front Street, Rm 6293
`San Diego, CA 92101
`San Diego, CA 92101
`melanie.pierson@usdoj.gov
`melanie.pierson@usdoj.gov
`
`Sabrina Feve
`Sabrina Feve
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`880 Front Street, Rm 6293
`880 Front Street, Rm 6293
`San Diego, CA 92101
`San Diego, CA 92101
`sfeve@usa.doj.gov
`sfeve@usa.doj.gov
`
`Candina S. Heath
`Candina S. Heath
`Department of Justice
`Department of Justice
`1301 New York Avenue NW, Suite 600
`1301 New York Avenue NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20530
`Washington, DC 20530
`candina.heath2@usdoj.gov
`candina.heath2@usdoj.gov
`
`I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`America that the foregoing is true and correct.
`America that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed on August 31, 2022 in San Diego, California.
`Executed on August 31, 2022 in San Diego, California.
`
`/s/ Randy K. Jones
`/s/ Randy K Jones
`Randy K. Jones
`Randy K. Jones
`Attorney for Mark Manoogian
`Attorney for Mark Manoogian
`
`128722869v.4
`128722869v.4
`
`1
`1
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`10
`10
`11
`11
`12
`12
`13
`13
`14
`14
`15
`15
`16
`16
`17
`17
`18
`18
`19
`19
`20
`20
`21
`21
`22
`22
`23
`23
`24
`24
`25
`25
`26
`26
`27
`27
`28
`28
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site