`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER,
`WOLPERT, NESSIM, DROOKS
`LINCENBERG & RHOW P.C.
`Gary S. Lincenberg, SBN 123058
`Nicole R. Van Dyk, SBN 261646
`Darren L. Patrick, SBN 310727
`Alexis A. Wiseley, SBN 330100
`1875 Century Park East, Floor 23
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Telephone: (310) 201-2100
`Email: glincenberg@birdmarella.com
` nvandyk@birdmarella.com
` dpatrick@birdmarella.com
` awiseley@birdmarella.com
`
`Attorneys for Petr Pacas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`JACOB BYCHAK, et al.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`Case No. 18-CR-4683-GPC
`Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
`ORDER APPROVING MR.
`PACAS’S TRAVEL REQUEST
`
`
`Filed concurrently with Declaration of
`Alexis A. Wiseley
`
`
`
`Petr Pacas, by and through his counsel of record, hereby submits this
`Unopposed Motion for an order modifying Mr. Pacas’s bond conditions to permit
`him to travel to countries within the European Union with his family between July
`21, 2022 and August 12, 2022, including all countries through which travel is
`required for flight layovers and any additional days necessitated by flight delays or
`cancellations, so long as Mr. Pacas provides his Pretrial Services Officer with a
`copy of his travel itinerary and calls Pretrial Services both prior to departure and
`3800742.1
`Case No. 18-CR-4683-GPC
`
`PETR PACAS'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING TRAVEL REQUEST
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 486 Filed 07/12/22 PageID.7256 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`upon his return. The basis for this unopposed motion is as follows:
`On October 31, 2018, Mr. Pacas and co-defendants Jacob Bychak,
`1.
`Mark Manoogian, and Mohammed Abdul Qayyum were charged in a 10-count
`indictment for conspiracy to commit violations of the wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C. §
`1343) and the CAN-SPAM Act (18 U.S.C. § 1037(a)(5)). (Dkt. 1.)
`On November 5, 2018, Mr. Pacas was arraigned and released on a
`2.
`$50,000 appearance bond secured by his signature. As a condition of his release, his
`travel was restricted to San Diego County, the Central District of California, and the
`state of Utah at the discretion of his Pretrial Services Officer. (Dkt. 26.) A true and
`correct copy of the November 5, 2018 Pretrial Release Order is attached as Exhibit
`A.
`
`This Court previously approved Mr. Pacas’s request to travel to the
`3.
`Czech Republic and Austria from December 20, 2018 through January 3, 2019.
`(Dkt. 43.) Mr. Pacas departed and returned on the approved dates as instructed
`without incident.
`This Court previously approved Mr. Pacas’s request to travel to Hawaii
`4.
`from September 24, 2019 through October 2, 2019. (Dkt. 124.)
`This Court previously approved Mr. Pacas’s request to travel to the
`5.
`Czech Republic in June of 2020. (Dkt. 156.) Mr. Pacas was ultimately unable to
`travel in June of 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
`This Court previously approved Mr. Pacas’s request to travel to the
`6.
`Czech Republic in June of 2021, with a return date on or before July 15, 2021.
`(Dkt. 238.) Mr. Pacas departed and returned on the approved dates as instructed
`without incident.
`This Court previously approved Mr. Pacas’s request to travel to the
`7.
`Czech Republic in December of 2021, with a return date on or before January 15,
`2022. (Dkt. 308.) Mr. Pacas departed and returned on the approved dates as
`instructed without incident.
`3800742.1
`
`Case No. 18-CR-4683-GPC
`2
`PETR PACAS'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING TRAVEL REQUEST
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 486 Filed 07/12/22 PageID.7257 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3800742.1
`
`
`
`On May 23, 2022, the trial in this case began and, on June 10, 2022, the
`8.
`Court declared a mistrial. (Dkts. 443, 485.)
`On June 10, 2022, the Court approved the Deferred Prosecution
`9.
`Agreement entered into between the government and Mr. Pacas. (Dkt. 477.)
`Pursuant to that agreement, the United States has agreed to dismiss the charges in
`the Indictment as to Mr. Pacas at the end of the deferral period. (Id. ¶ A.) However,
`Mr. Pacas remains subject to supervision by United States Pretrial Services during
`the deferral period. (Id. ¶ C.2.)
`10. Mr. Pacas’s Deferred Prosecution Hearing is set for June 12, 2023 at
`10:30 AM in Courtroom 2D. Mr. Pacas is required to appear in person unless the
`government moves to dismiss prior to the hearing. (Dkt. 476.)
`11. On July 7 and 8, 2022, Mr. Pacas’s counsel conferred with Mr. Pacas’s
`Pretrial Services Officer, Russell Parris, regarding Mr. Pacas’s travel request. Mr.
`Parris indicated that he will defer to the Court’s ruling.
`12. On July 11, 2022, Mr. Pacas’s counsel conferred by email with
`Assistant United States Attorneys Sabrina Fève and Melanie Pierson, and Computer
`Crime and Intellectual Property Section Senior Counsel for the United States
`Department of Justice Candy Heath, to confirm that they had no objection to Mr.
`Pacas’s travel request. On the same day, Assistant United States Attorney Pierson
`confirmed that the government has no objection. A true and correct copy of the July
`11, 2022 email is attached as Exhibit B.
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER, WOLPERT,
`NESSIM, DROOKS, LINCENBERG &
`RHOW, P.C.
` By: s/ Alexis A. Wiseley
`
`Gary S. Lincenberg
`Nicole Rodriguez Van Dyk
`Darren L. Patrick
`Alexis A. Wiseley
`Attorneys for Petr Pacas
`Case No. 18-CR-4683-GPC
`3
`PETR PACAS'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING TRAVEL REQUEST
`
`Dated: July 12, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site