`
`
`
`
`
`WIECHERT, MUNK & GOLDSTEIN, PC
`David W. Wiechert, SBN 94607
`Jessica C. Munk, SBN 238832
`Jahnavi Goldstein, SBN 245084
`27136 Paseo Espada, Suite B1123
`San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
`Telephone: (949) 361-2822
`Email: dwiechert@wmgattorneys.com
` jessica@wmgattorneys.com
` jahnavi@wmgattorneys.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Jacob Bychak
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`
`JACOB BYCHAK, MARK
`MANOOGIAN, MOHAMMED
`ABDUL QAYYUM, AND PETR
`PACAS,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
` CASE NO. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC
`
`Assigned to Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel
`
`DEFENDANT JACOB BYCHAK’S
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THE
`FOLLOWING MATERIALS EX
`PARTE/IN-CAMERA AND UNDER SEAL:
`1) DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF MOTION
`AND MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE
`TESTIMONY OF GOVERNMENT
`EXPERT WITNESSES BENKERT AND
`KINRICH;
`2) DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM OF
`POINTS AND AUTHORTIES IN
`SUPPORT THEREOF;
`3) THE DECLARATION OF JESSICA C.
`MUNK AND EXHIBITS THERETO
`
`[Proposed Order Signature Block Herein]
`
`
`
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Jacob Bychak, hereby moves the Court
`
`for an order granting leave to file the following materials ex parte/in-camera and under
`
`1
`DEFENDANT JACOB BYCHAK’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MATERIALS EX PARTE/ IN-
`CAMERA AND UNDER SEAL
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`30
`
`31
`
`32
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 348 Filed 03/24/22 PageID.4490 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`30
`
`31
`
`32
`
`seal: 1) Defendants’1 Notice of Motion and Motion In Limine to Exclude Testimony of
`
`Government Expert Witnesses Benkert and Kinrich; 2) Defendants’ Memorandum of
`
`Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; and 3) the Declaration of Jessica C. Munk and
`
`Exhibits Thereto (collectively the “MIL Filings”).
`
`Defendant Bychak brings this Motion to preserve and protect the attorney client
`
`privileged information set forth in the MIL Filings. The Court has inherent authority to
`
`seal and protect records and filings. See Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589,
`
`598 (1978). Protection of attorney client privilege and work product are compelling
`
`reasons to justify a motion to seal. See Hanson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc., 2013
`
`WL 5674997, at *3 (W.D. Wash. 2013)
`
`The MIL Filings relate to Defendants’ motion to the exclude the testimony of two
`
`government expert witnesses David E. Benkert and Jeffrey H. Kinrich (the “Witnesses”)
`
`because they were previously retained by Company A, which was a party with the
`
`Defendants to a joint defense agreement, and the Witnesses received and relied upon
`
`privileged information provided to them by Defendant Bychak regarding the topics that
`
`the Witnesses intend to testify to. The MIL Filings go into very specific details regarding
`
`the privileged information shared by Defendant Bychak with these Witnesses.
`
`Furthermore, the MIL Filings quote to and include a complete copy of the written joint
`
`defense agreement that Defendants were party to along with Company A, and that
`
`agreement itself is privileged.
`
`Additionally, there is good cause for the MIL Filings to be filed ex parte and in-
`
`camera, in addition to being filed under seal. It is black letter law that disclosure of
`
`privileged information to a third party generally constitutes a waiver of the privilege.
`
`Therefore, the MIL Filings, which contain detailed privileged information, cannot be
`
`served on the government, as the government’s receipt of the privileged information
`
`would likely destroy/waive the privilege. Accordingly, Defendant Bychak appropriately
`
`
`1 “Defendants” are Jacob Bychak, Mark Manoogian, Mohammed Abdul Qayyum and Petr
`Pacas.
`
`2
`DEFENDANT JACOB BYCHAK’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MATERIALS EX PARTE/ IN-
`CAMERA AND UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 348 Filed 03/24/22 PageID.4491 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`seeks leave to file the MIL Filings ex parte for the Court’s in-camera review, which is
`
`necessary to maintain the privilege.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 24, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`DATE:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted:
`
`
`
`WIECHERT, MUNK & GOLDSTEIN, PC
`
`By: s/ Jessica C. Munk
` Jessica C. Munk
` Attorney for Jacob Bychak
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` HONORABLE GONZALO P. CURIEL
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`DEFENDANT JACOB BYCHAK’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MATERIALS EX PARTE/ IN-
`CAMERA AND UNDER SEAL
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`30
`
`31
`
`32
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 348 Filed 03/24/22 PageID.4492 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Counsel for Defendant certifies that the foregoing pleading has been electronically
`
`served on the following parties by virtue of their registration with the CM/ECF system:
`
`
`AUSA Melanie K. Pierson
`AUSA Sabrina L. Feve
`AUSA Ashley E. Goff
`U.S. Attorney’s Office
`880 Front Street, Rm 6293
`San Diego, CA 92101
`melanie.pierson@usdoj.gov
`sabrina.feve@usdoj.gov
`ashley.goff@usdoj.gov
`
`Candina S. Heath
`Department of Justice
`1301 New York Avenue NW, Suite 600
`Washington, DC 20530
`candina.heath2@usdoj.gov
`
`
`
` I
`
` certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`America that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`Executed on March 24, 2022, at San Juan Capistrano, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/Jessica C. Munk
`Jessica C. Munk
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`30
`
`31
`
`32
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site