`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 2
`Declaration of AUSA Melanie Pierson
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 316-2 Filed 12/10/21 PageID.4107 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`RANDY S. GROSSMAN
`Acting United States Attorney
`MELANIE K. PIERSON
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`California State Bar Nos. 112520
`Federal Office Building
`880 Front Street, Room 6293
`San Diego, California 92101-8893
`Telephone: (619) 546-7976
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`United States of America
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`Case No. 18-cr-4683-GPC
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ASSISTANT U.S.
`
`Plaintiff,
`ATTORNEY MELANIE K. PIERSON
`
`REGARDING THE REVIEW OF THE CHS
`v.
`
`FILE
`
`
`JACOB BYCHAK et. al.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`I, Melanie K. Pierson, hereby submit the following declaration in
`response to the court’s request for information regarding the source
`of information from Spamhaus (SS). I state under penalty of perjury
`that:
`1.
`
`I have been employed an Assistant United States Attorney in
`the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District
`of California since 1987. I am one of the prosecutors
`assigned to the investigation and prosecution of Jacob
`Bychak, Mark Manoogian, Mohammed Abdul Qayyum and Petr Pacas
`in Criminal Case No, 18cr-4683-GPC. That case is currently
`set for trial in May of 2022.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 316-2 Filed 12/10/21 PageID.4108 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`On November 18, 2021, the court held a hearing on the
`defendants’ motions for reconsideration of the denial of the
`motion for disclosure of the identity of SS. During that
`hearing, the court requested that the government review the
`CHS file of SS, and inquire regarding any other internal FBI
`files regarding the activities of SS in this case.
`On November 30, 2021, I visited the FBI offices in San Diego
`and reviewed the electronic file of CHS No. S-00091118, which
`was created by another FBI field office in October of 2018.
`I reviewed every page of this electronic file. The file
`contained no mention of any activities of SS in conjunction
`with the San Diego office of the FBI, no mention of any of
`the individual defendants and no mention of the netblocks at
`issue in this case. The file contained two documents that
`named Company A, among many other companies, as involved in
`spamming. Redacted versions of these two documents were
`thereafter produced to the defense as discovery.
`The file indicated that the CHS was not expected to testify
`but was acting as a source of information regarding spam and
`spammers. The file indicated that beginning in October of
`2018, the CHS was annually given four admonishments,
`including one indicating that the CHS was providing
`voluntarily providing truthful information and could take no
`independent action without direction from the FBI. The file
`indicated that there were no payments to the CHS and no
`issues with truthfulness.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 316-2 Filed 12/10/21 PageID.4109 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`
`DATED:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`I asked Special Agent Chabalko if there were any internal
`FBI documents regarding his contacts with SS, other than
`those which had already been provided to the prosecutors.
`Agent Chabalko advised that no separate file exists regarding
`SS in the San Diego Field Office of the FBI. He told me he
`reviewed his available case review updates provided to his
`supervisors. Case review updates older than the last five
`years are no longer available. Special Agent Chabalko advised
`that only two of the case review updates mentioned Spamhaus,
`which he provided to me for review. The file reviews that
`mention Spamhaus cover the period from March 25, 2017 to June
`30, 2017, and for the period from October 1, 2017 to December
`31, 2017. Those reports indicated that Chabalko had received
`information and documents from Spamhaus. The identity of the
`documents were not specified and there was no substantive
`discussion of the nature of the information provided by
`Spamhaus in the case review updates. Special Agent Chabalko
`stated that he was aware of no other internal FBI documents
`mentioning his contacts with SS that have not been provided
`to prosecutors.
`
`December 10, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MELANIE K. PIERSON
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site