`
`
`
`WIECHERT, MUNK & GOLDSTEIN, PC
`David W. Wiechert, SBN 94607
`Jessica C. Munk, SBN 238832
`William J. Migler, SBN 318518
`27136 Paseo Espada, Suite B1123
`San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
`Tel: (949) 361-2822
`Email: dwiechert@aol.com
` jessica@wmgattorneys.com
` william@wmgattorneys.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Jacob Bychak
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Case No. 18-CR-4683-GPC
`Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel
`
`DECLARATION OF JESSICA C. MUNK
`IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
`COMPEL DISCOVERY RELATING TO
`SPAMHAUS’ HISTORY OF
`COOPERARTING WITH
`GOVERNMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS;
`EXHIBITS A-C
`
`Hearing Date: October 4, 2021
`Hearing Time: 1:00 P.M.
`Department: Courtroom 2D
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`JACOB BYCHAK, et al.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF JESSICA C. MUNK
`
`I, Jessica C. Munk, declare:
`1. I am a principal at the law firm Wiechert, Munk & Goldstein, PC, attorneys of
`record for defendant Jacob Bychak. I am licensed to practice in the State of California and
`in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. I have personal
`
`1
`DECLARATION OF JESSICA C. MUNK
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 281-2 Filed 09/20/21 PageID.3177 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`knowledge of the following, and if called to do so, I could competently testify thereto.
`
`2. Defendants previously moved the Court to order the government to identify all
`documents in its possession which were forwarded from the Company A informant, via
`Spamhaus (“Motion to Compel”). Dkt. No. 257. At the hearing on this motion,
`government counsel indicated that the Spamhaus informant “is not just corresponding
`with the FBI agent here, but also with the FBI agents in other offices.” A true and correct
`copy of the relevant excerpts of the transcript from the August 20, 2021 hearing reflecting
`this statement is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The quoted statement begins on page 8,
`line 23.
`3. Soon after this Motion to Compel was filed, on August 12, 2021 the government
`made its 40th document production to the defense, which included an FBI 302 whereby
`the government attempts to rewrite history and distance itself from the Spamhaus
`informant’s lengthy cooperation with the government, stating the Spamhaus informant
`was not “officially a CHS for the FBI until 10/12/18.” A true and correct copy of this 302
`is attached hereto as Exhibit B. This 302 is contrary to the numerous 302s provided by
`the government in discovery dated 2013 and 2014 hereby the Spamhaus informant is
`clearly identified as CHS (S-0009118).
`4. Also, after Defendants filed this prior Motion to Compel discovery related to the
`Spamhaus informant, the government on August 6, 2021 produced over 1,800 pages of
`additional discovery. Included in this production was a dossier from the Spamhaus
`informant, which was given to the government in June of 2014. The dossier contained
`Brady material helpful to the defense, and it was not produced until after the defense filed
`its July 30, 2021 Motion to Compel.
`5. On August 20, 2021, the Court granted the motion in part and ordered the
`government to have the Spamhaus informant identify which documents he provided came
`from the Company A informant. Dkt. No. 275. On August 25, 2021, government counsel
`sent the defense a letter delineating which documents the Company A informant gave to
`Spamhaus.
`
`2
`DECLARATION OF JESSICA C. MUNK
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 281-2 Filed 09/20/21 PageID.3178 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`6. In a recent document production, the government produced emails from August
`2021 between the FBI and the Spamhaus informant showing that the informant assisted
`the government in circumventing the attorney-client privilege in those documents taken
`from Company A. Specifically, the informant provided documents containing summaries
`of various emails and explaining that “I found the C[] Y[] email documents, and to avoid
`any potential attorney/client privilege issues (even though they were sent voluntarily by
`Y[] and not by their attorney herself), I will only provide the headers of the emails as well
`as a summary of the contents to provide some context.” A true and correct redacted copy
`of the relevant portions of this email is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
`7. On August 25 and 26, 2021, defense counsel asked the government to provide
`all documents and information relating to Spamhaus assisting the government in other
`investigations or prosecutions apart from the instant case relating to potential violations of
`the CAN-SPAM Act and other federal statutes. On August 26, 2021, the government
`declined to do so.
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`Executed on September 20, 2021 in San Juan Capistrano, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Jessica C. Munk
`Jessica C. Munk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`DECLARATION OF JESSICA C. MUNK
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site