`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`Gary S. Lincenberg - State Bar No. 123058
` glincenberg@birdmarella.com
`Nicole R. Van Dyk – State Bar No. 261646
` nvandyk@birdmarella.com
`Darren L. Patrick - State Bar No. 310727
` dpatrick@birdmarella.com
`BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER, WOLPERT, NESSIM,
`DROOKS, LINCENBERG & RHOW, P.C.
`1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90067-2561
`Telephone: (310) 201-2100
`Facsimile: (310) 201-2110
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Petr Pacas
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
` CASE NO. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC-4
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
`Plaintiff,
`ORDER APPROVING TRAVEL
`
`REQUEST
`vs.
`
`
`PETR PACAS,
`Filed Concurrently with Declaration of
`
`Darren L. Patrick and [Proposed] Order
`Defendant.
`
`
`Assigned to Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel
`
`
`
`
`Defendant Petr Pacas, by and through his counsel of record, hereby submits
`this Unopposed Motion for an order modifying Mr. Pacas’s bond conditions to
`permit him to travel to the Czech Republic to visit his family in June 2021 with a
`return date on or before July 15, 2021, so long as Mr. Pacas provides his Pretrial
`Services Officer with a copy of his travel itinerary to the Czech Republic and calls
`Pretrial Services both prior to departure and immediately upon his return. The basis
`for this unopposed motion is as follows:
`1.
`On October 31, 2018, Mr. Pacas and co-defendants Jacob Bychak,
`Mark Manoogian, and Mohammed Abdul Qayyum were charged in a 10-count
`indictment for conspiracy to commit violations of the wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C.
`§ 1343) and the CAN-SPAM Act (18 U.S.C. § 1037(a)(5)). (Dkt. 1.)
`2.
`On November 5, 2018, Mr. Pacas was arraigned and released on a
`3722999.1
`
`Case No. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC-4
`1
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING TRAVEL REQUEST
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 237 Filed 06/09/21 PageID.2416 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`$50,000 appearance bond secured by his signature. As a condition of release, his
`travel was restricted to San Diego County, the Central District of California, and the
`state of Utah at the discretion of his Pretrial Services Officer. (Dkt. 24.)
`3.
`This Court previously approved Mr. Pacas’s request to travel to the
`Czech Republic and Austria from December 20, 2018, through January 3, 2019.
`(Dkt. 43.) Mr. Pacas departed and returned on the approved dates as instructed
`without incident.
`4.
`This Court previously approved Mr. Pacas’s request to travel to Hawaii
`from September 24, 2019, through October 2, 2019. (Dkt. 124.) Mr. Pacas departed
`and returned on the approved dates as instructed without incident.
`5.
`This Court previously approved Mr. Pacas’s request to travel to the
`Czech Republic in June of 2020. (Dkt. 156.) Mr. Pacas departed and returned on
`the approved dates as instructed without incident.
`6.
`Trial is currently set in this matter for November 30, 2021.
`7.
`On June 7, 2021, Mr. Pacas’s counsel contacted Pretrial Services
`Officer Russell Parris by email to confirm that he had no objection to the request to
`allow Mr. Pacas to travel to the Czech Republic in June of 2020 with a return date
`on or before July 15, 2021, so long as Mr. Pacas provides Pretrial Services with a
`copy of his travel itinerary and calls Pretrial Services both prior to departure and
`immediately upon his return. Mr. Russell expressed no objection. (See Patrick
`Decl. ¶ 4, Ex. A.)
`7.
`On June 8, 2021, the government confirmed to defense counsel by
`email that it does not oppose this motion. (See id.)
`
`3722999.1
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC-4
`2
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING TRAVEL REQUEST
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 237 Filed 06/09/21 PageID.2417 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`DATED: June 9, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Gary S. Lincenberg
`Nicole R. Van Dyk
`Darren L. Patrick
`Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim,
`Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C.
`
`
`s/ Darren L. Patrick
`Darren L. Patrick
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Petr Pacas
`
`By:
`
`3722999.1
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC-4
`3
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING TRAVEL REQUEST
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 237 Filed 06/09/21 PageID.2418 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Counsel for Defendant certifies that the foregoing pleading has been
`
`electronically served on the following parties by virtue of their registration with the
`CM/ECF system:
`
`Ashley E. Goff
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`Email: ashley.goff@usdoj.gov
`
`Sabrina L. Feve
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`sabrina.feve@usdoj.gov
`
`Melanie K. Pierson
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`melanie.pierson@usdoj.gov
`
`Candina S. Heath
`U.S. Department of Justice
`Email: candina.heath2@usdoj.gov
`
`
`
`
`3722999.1
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC-4
`4
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING TRAVEL REQUEST
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 237 Filed 06/09/21 PageID.2419 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`DATED: June 9, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Gary S. Lincenberg
`Nicole R. Van Dyk
`Darren L. Patrick
`Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim,
`Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C.
`
`By:
`
`s/ Darren L. Patrick
`Darren L. Patrick
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Petr Pacas
`
`3722999.1
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC-4
`5
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING TRAVEL REQUEST
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site