`
`
`Randy K. Jones - SBN 141711
`rkjones@mintz.com
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,
`GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`3580 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300
`San Diego, California 92130
`Telephone: (858) 314-1510
`
`Attorney for Mark Manoogian
`
`
`Whitney Z. Bernstein - SBN 304917
`wbernstein@bmkattorneys.com
`Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. - SBN 135311
`tbienert@bmkattorneys.com
`James Riddet – SBN 39826
`jriddet@bmkattorneys.com
`BIENERT | KATZMAN PC
`903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 350
`San Clemente, California 92673
`Telephone: (949) 369-3700
`
`Attorneys for Mohammed Abdul
`Qayyum
`
`
`Gary S. Lincenberg - SBN 123058
` glincenberg@birdmarella.com
`Naeun Rim - SBN 263558
` nrim@birdmarella.com
`BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER, WOLPERT,
`NESSIM, DROOKS, LINCENBERG &
`RHOW, P.C.
`1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90067-2561
`Telephone: (310) 201-2100
`Facsimile: (310) 201-2110
`
`Attorneys for Petr Pacas
`
`David W. Wiechert - SBN 94607
`dwiechert@aol.com
`Jessica C. Munk - SBN 238832
`jessica@wmgattorneys.com
`William J. Migler - SBN 318518
`william@wmgattorneys.com
`WIECHERT, MUNK & GOLDSTEIN, PC
`27136 Paseo Espada, Suite B1123
`San Juan Capistrano, California 92675
`Telephone: (949) 361-2822
`
`Attorneys for Jacob Bychak
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
` CASE NO. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC
`
`MOTION TO CONTINUE
`BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
`DECLARATION OF NAEUN RIM
`
`Assigned to Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`JACOB BYCHAK, MARK
`MANOOGIAN, MOHAMMED
`ABDUL QAYYUM, AND PETR
`PACAS,
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MOTION TO CONTINUE
`
`Case No. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 216 Filed 10/15/20 PageID.2220 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`In light of various deadlines and hearings in other matters, Defendants Jacob
`Bychak, Mark Manoogian, Mohammed Abdul Qayyum, and Petr Pacas
`(“Defendants”), by and through counsel of record, move this Court for an order
`extending the deadlines to file supplemental briefing regarding IP netblocks and
`property issues, as ordered by the Court on October 1, 2020. (Dkt. 214.)
`Defendants request the following briefing schedule:
`Defendants are to file their supplemental brief by November 2, 2020;
`The Government is to file its opposition brief by November 16, 2020; and
`Defendants are to file their reply by November 23, 2020.
`Defendants also seek a continuance of the hearing from November 19, 2020
`to December 3, 2020 at 1:00 p.m., or on another date that the Court is available to
`hear the matter.
`The Government has not taken a position on this motion. On October 13,
`2020, defense counsel Naeun Rim attempted to meet and confer with counsel for the
`Government by email regarding the proposed dates. (Decl. Rim ¶ 2.) On October
`14, 2020, Assistant United States Attorney (“AUSA”) Melanie Pierson informed
`defense counsel that she did not object to the dates but had not heard back from
`AUSA Sabrina Feve, who was in trial. (Id.) At 8:48 a.m. on October 15, 2020, Ms.
`Feve informed defense counsel by email that she did not oppose the proposed dates,
`but then emailed again at 9:06 a.m. to note that Ms. Pierson had a trial on November
`2, which may pose a conflict. (Decl. Rim ¶ 3.) Defense counsel reminded Ms. Feve
`that the proposed deadline for the Government’s brief was November 16, 2020, and
`that Ms. Pierson had already agreed to the proposed dates. (Id.) Defense counsel
`asked for a response by 11 a.m. to enable the timely filing of this motion. As of the
`time of filing, the Government had not yet responded. (Id.)
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`MOTION TO CONTINUE
`
`Case No. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 216 Filed 10/15/20 PageID.2221 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`DATED: October 15, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`Given that the original briefing deadline was set for today, Defendants now
`submit this motion to the Court.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Gary S. Lincenberg
`Naeun Rim
`Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim,
`Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Naeun Rim
`Naeun Rim
`
`Attorneys for Petr Pacas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`MOTION TO CONTINUE
`
`Case No. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 216 Filed 10/15/20 PageID.2222 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`DECLARATION OF NAEUN RIM
`I, Naeun Rim, declare as follows:
`I am an active member of the Bar of the State of California and a
`1.
`Principal with Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow,
`A Professional Corporation, attorneys of record for Petr Pacas in this action. I make
`this declaration in support of Motion to Continue Briefing Schedule. Except for
`those matters stated on information and belief, I make this declaration based upon
`personal knowledge and, if called upon to do so, I could and would so testify.
`On October 13, 2020, I emailed counsel for the Government to meet
`2.
`and confer regarding the proposed dates. On October 14, 2020, Assistant United
`States Attorney (“AUSA”) Melanie Pierson emailed me and informed me that she
`did not object to the dates but wanted to wait to hear back from AUSA Sabrina
`Feve, who was in trial.
`At 8:48 a.m. on October 15, 2020, Ms. Feve responded to my email of
`3.
`two days ago and initially informed me that the Government did not oppose the
`proposed dates. At 9:06 a.m., Ms. Feve emailed again to note that Ms. Pierson had a
`trial on November 2, which may pose a conflict. I reminded Ms. Feve that the
`proposed deadline for the Government’s brief was November 16, 2020, two weeks
`after the trial date, and that Ms. Pierson had already agreed to the proposed dates. I
`asked for a response by 11 a.m. to enable the timely filing of this motion. As of the
`time of filing, the Government had not yet responded.
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
`America that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I executed this declaration
`on October 15, 2020, at Los Angeles, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Naeun Rim
`Naeun Rim
`
`
`
`1
`MOTION TO CONTINUE
`
`Case No. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 216 Filed 10/15/20 PageID.2223 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`Counsel for Defendants certify that the foregoing pleading has been
`
`electronically served on the following parties by virtue of their registration with the
`CM/ECF system:
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`Sabrina L. Feve
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`sabrina.feve@usdoj.gov
`
`Melanie K. Pierson
`Assistance U.S. Attorney
`melanie.pierson@usdoj.gov
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Gary S. Lincenberg
`Naeun Rim
`Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim,
`Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`DATED: October 15, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`s/ Naeun Rim
`Naeun Rim
`
`Attorneys for Petr Pacas
`
`2
`MOTION TO CONTINUE
`
`Case No. 3:18-cr-04683-GPC
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site