throbber
Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 2 Filed 10/31/18 PagelD.8 Page1of1
`
`AN shay,
`64
`eh
`a
`Ok
`a
`ef
`$b Bowe bet
`ISOCT31 PM 4:12
`WShERK. 1S DISTR:
`SOUTHERIOS TRICTOFEAUFGRA
`
`ay RO
`
`DEPUTY
`|
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICY COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`Case No. 18 GR 4685 GPC
`
`NOTICE OF RELATED CASE
`
`:
`
`i
`
`.
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`Vv.
`
`JACOB BYCHAK,
`MARK MANOOGIAN,
`MOHAMMED ABDUL QAYYUM,
`PETR PACAS,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT:
`
`Please take notice that the above entitled case is related to United
`
`States v. Daniel Dye, Case No. 18-CR-0822-GPC,
`
`and United States v.
`
`Vincent Tarney, Case No. 18-CR-3469-GPC, pursuant to Local Rule 57.2.1,
`
`Related Cases.
`
`The United States Attorney certifies the cases are
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`related for the following reason(s):
`
`(1) More than one indictment or information is filed or
`pending against the same defendant or defendants.
`
`A (2) Prosecution against different defendants arises from:
`
`____s fa)
`
`«A common wiretap
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`_____—s
`(b)
`~A common search warrant
`YK (c) Activities that are part of the same alleged
`criminal event or transaction;
`that is,
`the
`cages involved substantially the same facts
`and the same questions of law.
`
`| Attorney
`
`28 DATED:
`
`10/a4 [i
`
`.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket