`
`
`ROBERT S. BREWER, JR.
`United States Attorney
`MELANIE K. PIERSON
`Assistant U.S. Attorney
`California Bar No. 112520
`Office of the U.S. Attorney
`880 Front Street, Room 6293
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Tel: (619) 546-7976
`Fax: (619) 546-0631
`Email: Melanie.Pierson@usdoj.gov
`
`Attorneys for the United States
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`Case No. 18-CR-4683-GPC
`
`
`v.
`
`Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel
`
`
`JACOB BYCHAK,
`
`STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE
`MARK MANOOGIAN,
`ORDER FOR RESTRICTED
`MOHAMMED ABDUL QAYYUM,
`MATERIAL
`and PETR PACAS,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, the United
`States Attorney, and defendants Jacob Bychak, Mark Manoogian, Mohammed Abdul
`Qayyum, and Petr Pacas (collectively "defendants"), by and through their counsel of
`record, anticipate that documents and other information disclosed in connection with this
`case ("Material") by the government to defendants may contain confidential, trade secret
`or proprietary information of Amobee, Inc. ("Amobee"). The parties hereby stipulate as
`follows:
`
`identified to the government by Amobee as containing
`Any Material
`1.
`confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information shall be marked by the government on
`the first page with the legend "RESTRICTED" at the time the documents are made
`available for examination and when copies are produced to defendants. Any Material that
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 195-1 Filed 07/02/20 PageID.1984 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`is produced on electronic format may be designated Restricted by marking the medium
`(thumb drive, hard drive, DVD, etc.) “RESTRICTED” or, where this is impracticable, by
`written notice accompanying the production. Material will not be designated Restricted if
`it has previously been made public.
`
`Inadvertent failure to designate Material as Restricted may be remedied by
`2.
`supplemental written notice and may be retroactively designated in the same manner and
`shall be treated appropriately from the date written notice of the designation is provided to
`defendants.
`
`If defendants contest the government’s designation of any Material as
`3.
`Restricted, defendants may seek review of the designation by the Court.
`
`Restricted Material shall not be used or disclosed in connection with any
`4.
`action or for any purpose, except that, solely for the purpose of this litigation, Restricted
`Material may be disclosed to and reviewed by only the following persons:
`
`(a) Defendants;
`
`their associated attorneys, private
`including
`(b) Defendants’ attorneys,
`investigators, and secretarial, paralegal, clerical and other employees, as well as the United
`States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California and secretarial, paralegal,
`clerical and other employees and any law enforcement agents assigned to this case;
`
`(c) The Court, persons employed by the Court, and stenographers transcribing the
`testimony or argument at a hearing, trial or deposition or appeal related to the above-
`captioned matter;
`
`(d) Directors, officers or employees of Amobee, as well as Amobee’s counsel;
`
`Experts and trial witnesses in this action, as well as anyone working with or
`(e)
`for such experts.
`
`5. With respect to persons covered under subsection (d), disclosure may be made
`only after written notice to Amobee’s counsel. With respect to persons covered under
`2
`Protective Order for Restricted Materials
`18cr4683-GPC
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 195-1 Filed 07/02/20 PageID.1985 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`subsection (e), disclosure of Restricted Material may be made only after such persons
`execute the Memorandum of Understanding attached to the Protective Order. Defendants
`must either serve the executed Memorandum of Understanding on the government or file
`the executed Memorandum of Understanding with the Court, within seven (7) calendar
`days of the disclosure.
`
`6. Without written permission from Amobee or a court order, a party (the
`government or any of the defendants) may not file any Restricted Material in the public
`record in this action. The parties agree to seek permission of the court to file any Restricted
`Material relevant to any hearing before the court under seal.
`
`7. When not in use, Restricted Material shall be kept in a locked area inaccessible
`to persons who are not authorized access under this Stipulation and the Protective Order.
`
`If another court or an administrative agency subpoenas or orders production
`8.
`of any Restricted Material, the parties (the government and defendants) will make
`reasonable efforts to protect the Restricted Material, including promptly notifying Amobee
`and cooperating with Amobee in seeking a protective order.
`
`Not later than sixty (60) days after the conclusion of this action including,
`9.
`without limitation, any appeals or the expiration of any time for appeal, counsel for
`defendants shall collect and return to the government all Restricted Material (including all
`copies, extracts, abstracts, charts and summaries thereof).
`
`10. This Stipulation and the Protective Order do not apply to the use of Restricted
`Material during a court hearing or trial.
`
`11. Except as provided in paragraph 10, the provisions of this Stipulation and the
`Protective Order shall, absent further order of the Court, continue to be binding throughout
`and after the conclusion of this action, including, without limitation, any appeals. The final
`resolution of this case shall not relieve any person who has received Restricted Material
`from the obligations imposed by this Stipulation and the Protective Order, and the Court
`
`Protective Order for Restricted Materials
`
`3
`
`
`18cr4683-GPC
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 195-1 Filed 07/02/20 PageID.1986 Page 4 of 6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`shall retain jurisdiction after such final determination or settlement for the limited purpose
`of enforcing the provisions of this Stipulation and the Protective Order.
`
`Dated: June 16, 2020
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`ROBERT S. BREWER, JR.
`United States Attorney
`
`By
`Melanie K. Pierson
`Assistant United States Attorney
`
`Dated: July 1, 2020
`
`BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER, WOLPERT, NESSIM,
`DROOKS, LINCENBERG & RHOW, P.C.
`
`By
`Gary S. Lincenberg
`Naeun Rim
`Attorneys for Petr Pacas
`
`Dated: ____________, 2020
`
`WIECHERT, MUNK & GOLDSTEIN, PC
`
`By
`
`David W. Wiechert
`Jessica C. Munk
`William J. Migler
`Attorneys for Jacob Bychak
`
`Protective Order for Restricted Materials
`
`4
`
`18cr4683-GPC
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 195-1 Filed 07/02/20 PageID.1987 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`
`Case 3:18-cr-04683-GPC Document 195-1 Filed 07/02/20 PageID.1988 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`Dated: ____________, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: ____________, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND
`POPEO, P.C.
`
`
`By
`Randy K. Jones
`Attorney for Mark Manoogian
`
`BIENERT | KATZMAN PC
`
`
`By
`Whitney Z. Bernstein
`Thomas H. Bienert, Jr.
`James Riddet
`Attorneys for Mohammed Abdul Qayyum
`
`Protective Order for Restricted Materials
`
`5
`
`
`18cr4683-GPC
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`June 23
`
`July 1
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site