throbber
Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2166 Page 1 of 43
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INCORPORATED,
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`
`[REDLINED] AMENDED
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`Judge: Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`Magistrate Judge: Hon. Mitchell D. Dembin
`
`AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
`
`
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2167 Page 2 of 43
`
`
`
`In order to expedite the flow of discovery material, facilitate the prompt
`
`resolution of disputes over confidentiality, adequately protect confidential materials,
`
`and ensure that protection is afforded only to material so entitled, and for good cause
`
`shown, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), it is hereby ORDERED THAT:
`1.
`
`PURPOSE AND LIMITATIONS
`1.1 Protected Material designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`
`– OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” under the terms of
`
`this Protective Order shall be used by a Receiving Party solely for the above-captioned
`
`cases and all related appeals, and shall not be used directly or indirectly for any other
`
`purpose whatsoever, except as expressly provided for herein and/or agreed to by the
`
`producing party.
`1.2 Nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed to require a
`
`Producing Party to produce or disclose information not otherwise required to be
`
`produced under the applicable rules or orders of the Court. Production or disclosure
`
`of “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`
`ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`– SOURCE CODE” information under this Protective Order shall not prejudice the
`
`right of any Producing Party making that production or disclosure to maintain the
`
`trade secret status or confidentiality of that information in other contexts. Similarly,
`
`no Producing Party waives any right to object on any ground to the admissibility of
`
`any of the Discovery Material, or portion thereof, covered by this Protective Order.
`1.3 Disclosure and discovery activity in this Action is likely to involve
`
`production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special
`
`protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than litigating
`
`this Action may be warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition
`
`the Court to enter this Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Protective
`
`Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`1
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2168 Page 3 of 43
`
`
`
`and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the
`
`limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the
`
`applicable legal principles.
`
`2.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`2.1 Action: Qualcomm Incorporated v. Apple Inc., Case No. 3:17-CV-
`
`02403-CAB-MDD.
`2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation
`
`of information or items under this Protective Order.
`2.3 Chip-Level Schematics: include electronic drawings and symbolic
`
`representations that describe or depict digital or analog electrical or electronic circuits
`
`within integrated circuit chips.
`2.4
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of
`
`how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection
`
`under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). A Producing Party may designate any
`
`Disclosure or Discovery Material as “CONFIDENTIAL” if it contains or reflects
`
`confidential, proprietary, and/or commercially sensitive information.
`2.5 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House
`
`Counsel (as well as their legal support staff).
`2.6 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or
`
`items
`
`that
`
`it produces
`
`in disclosures or
`
`in responses
`
`to discovery as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`
`ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`– SOURCE CODE.”
`2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless
`
`of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including,
`
`among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or
`
`generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`
`
`2
`
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2169 Page 4 of 43
`
`
`
`2.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter
`
`pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its Outside Counsel of
`
`Record to serve as an expert witness or a litigation consultant in this Action (including
`
`any necessary support personnel of such person to whom disclosure is reasonably
`
`necessary for this litigation), and who is not a current employee of a Party or of a
`
`competitor of a Party, and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become
`
`an employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party.
`2.9
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”
`
`Information or Items: “Confidential Information or Items” that contain or reflect
`
`information that is extremely confidential and/or sensitive in nature and the Producing
`
`Party reasonably believes that the disclosure of such Discovery Material is likely to
`
`cause economic harm or significant competitive disadvantage to the Producing Party.
`
`The Parties agree that the following information, if non-public, shall be presumed to
`
`merit the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” designation:
`
`trade secrets, pricing information, financial data, sales or marketing forecasts or plans,
`
`business plans, sales or marketing strategy, product development information,
`
`engineering documents, testing documents, employee information, and other non-
`
`public information of similar competitive and business sensitivity.
`2.10 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`
`ONLY – SOURCE CODE” Information or Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential
`
`Information or Items” that include Source Code (as defined below) or Chip-Level
`
`Schematics (as defined above), disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party
`
`would create a substantial risk of serious competitive harm that could not be avoided
`
`by less restrictive means. Nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed as a
`
`representation or admission that Source Code or Chip-Level Schematics are properly
`
`discoverable in this Action, or to obligate any Party to produce any Source Code or
`
`Chip-Level Schematics.
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`
`
`3
`
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2170 Page 5 of 43
`
`
`
`2.11 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees in the legal department of
`
`a Party in this Action and who have responsibility for managing this Action. House
`
`Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
`2.12 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or
`
`other legal entity not named as a Party to this Action.
`2.13 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a Party
`
`to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a Party in connection with this
`
`Action and have entered an appearance on behalf of that Party in this Action, as well
`
`as other attorneys or support staff employed by the same firm as one of the attorneys
`
`who has entered an appearance on behalf of one of the Parties in this Action, to whom
`
`it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this Action.
`2.14 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors,
`
`employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their
`
`support staffs).
`2.15 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or
`
`Discovery Material in this Action.
`2.16 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support
`
`services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or
`
`demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium)
`
`and their employees and subcontractors. For the avoidance of doubt, Professional
`
`Vendors does not include professional jury or trial consultants or mock jurors.
`2.17 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is
`
`designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY”, or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE”, as provided for in this Protective Order.
`2.18 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material
`
`from a Producing Party.
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`
`
`4
`
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2171 Page 6 of 43
`
`
`
`2.19 Relevant Technology: technology related to (a) a user interface for
`
`displaying applications running on a computer system; (b) a user interface for digital
`
`camera focusing with corresponding flash; (c) gesture and touch sensitivity
`
`recognition; (d) multi-function power button technology; and/or (e) a user interface
`
`for responding to telephone calls with messages.
`2.20 Source Code: includes human-readable programming language text that
`
`defines software, firmware, (collectively, “software Source Code”) and integrated
`
`circuits (“hardware Source Code”). Text files containing Source Code shall
`
`hereinafter be referred to as “Source Code files.” Software Source Code files shall
`
`include, but are not limited to, files containing Source Code in “C,” “C++,” BREW,
`
`Java ME, J2ME, assembler, digital signal processor (DSP) programming languages,
`
`and other human readable text programming languages. Software Source Code files
`
`further include “.include files,” “make” files, “link” files, and other human-readable
`
`text files used in the generation and/or building of software directly executed on a
`
`microprocessor, micro-controller, or DSP. Hardware Source Code files include, but
`
`are not limited to, files containing Source Code in VDHL, Verilog, and other
`
`Hardware Description Language (“HDL”) formats, including but not limited to,
`
`Register Transfer Level (“RTL”) descriptions.
`
`3.
`
`SCOPE
`3.1 The protections conferred by this Protective Order cover not only
`
`Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted
`
`from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, derivations or
`
`compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or
`
`presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.
`3.2 Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing
`
`Party’s own disclosure or use of its own Protected Material for any purpose, and
`
`nothing in this Protective Order shall preclude any Producing Party from showing its
`
`own Protected Material to an individual who prepared the Protected Material.
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`5
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2172 Page 7 of 43
`
`
`
`Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Producing Party may not disclose its own Protected
`
`Material to the extent such Protected Material is also the Protected Material of any
`
`other party (e.g., settlement discussions and agreements containing confidentiality
`
`obligations), without the prior written consent of such other party, unless compelled
`
`to do so by a Court of competent jurisdiction.
`3.3 Nothing in this Protective Order shall restrict in any way the use or
`
`disclosure of Discovery Material by a Receiving Party that is: (i) in the public domain
`
`at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain
`
`after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a
`
`violation of this Protective Order, including becoming part of the public record
`
`through trial or otherwise; (ii) known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or
`
`obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the
`
`information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating
`
`Party; (iii) previously produced, disclosed and/or provided by the Designating Party
`
`to the Receiving Party or a non-party without an obligation of confidentiality and not
`
`by inadvertence or mistake; (iv) with the consent of the Designating Party; or (v)
`
`pursuant to order of the Court.
`3.4 Nothing in this Protective Order shall restrict a Producing Party’s use or
`
`disclosure of Discovery Material it produces that is designated as Protected Material
`
`by another Party or Non-Party, if it was previously disclosed, produced, or provided
`
`by the Designating Party to the Producing Party.
`3.5 Nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed to preclude any
`
`Party’s right to file any Protected Material with the Court under seal, subject to the
`
`procedures set forth in Judge Bencivengo’s Chambers Rules, Section V, updated
`
`January 23, 2018. This Protective Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party
`
`to seek further or additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this
`
`Protective Order in any way, including, without limitation, an order that certain matter
`
`not be produced at all.
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`
`
`6
`
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2173 Page 8 of 43
`
`
`
`4.
`
`DURATION
`4.1 Even after final disposition of the Action, the confidentiality obligations
`
`imposed by this Protective Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party
`
`agrees otherwise in writing, a court order otherwise directs, or that information
`
`otherwise becomes public. Final disposition occurs after an order, mandate, or
`
`dismissal finally terminating the above-captioned Action with prejudice, including all
`
`appeals.
`
`5.
`
`DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
`5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.
`
`Each Party or Non-Party that designates Discovery Materials for protection under this
`
`Protective Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that
`
`qualifies under the appropriate standards.
`5.2 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited except as
`
`provided specifically in this order or any federal statute or regulation.
`5.3
`
`If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items
`
`that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify
`
`for the level of protection initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly
`
`notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.
`5.4 Manner and Timing of Designations. Any Producing Party may
`
`designate Discovery Material with any of the following designations, provided that it
`
`meets
`
`the
`
`requirements
`
`for such designations as provided
`
`for herein:
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`
`ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`– SOURCE CODE.” Except as otherwise provided in this Protective Order (see, e.g.,
`
`Section 5.5), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material
`
`that qualifies for protection under this Protective Order must be clearly so designated
`
`before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this
`
`Protective Order requires:
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`
`
`7
`
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2174 Page 9 of 43
`
`
`
`(a)
`
`For information in documentary form (e.g., paper or
`
`electronically stored information (“ESI”), but excluding transcripts of
`
`depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing
`
`Party
`
`affix
`
`the
`
`legend
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL,”
`
`“HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY –
`
`SOURCE CODE” to each page that contains protected material and also,
`
`for ESI, in the metadata field assigned to indicate the confidentiality
`
`designation.1
`(b) A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or
`
`materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection
`
`until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material it would like
`
`copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation,
`
`all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or, in the
`
`case of Source Code or Chip-Level Schematics, “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY –
`
`SOURCE CODE.” After the inspecting Party has identified the
`
`documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must
`
`determine which documents qualify for protection under this Protective
`
`Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing
`
`Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL -– OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY –
`
`SOURCE CODE”) as set forth in the preceding paragraph.
`(c)
`
`For electronic files and documents produced in native
`
`
`1 This section does not require the Producing Party to produce its Source Code in any particular
`documentary or ESI format. The production of Source Code is governed by Section 8 below.
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`8
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2175 Page 10 of 43
`
`electronic format, that the Producing Party append to the file names or
`
`designators
`
`information
`
`indicating whether
`
`the
`
`files contains
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY” material, or shall use any other reasonable method for so
`
`designating Protected Materials produced in electronic format. When
`
`electronic files or documents are printed for use at deposition, in a court
`
`proceeding, or for provision in printed form to an Expert, the party
`
`printing the electronic files or documents shall affix a legend to the
`
`printed document corresponding to the designation of the Designating
`
`Party and including the production number and designation associated
`
`with the native file.
`(d)
`
`For testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial
`
`proceedings, that the Designating Party identify, either verbally on the
`
`record or in a writing served on all Parties and the court reporter within
`
`14 days after the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all
`
`protected testimony and specify the level of protection being asserted.
`
`Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated
`
`for protection shall be covered by the provisions of this Protective Order.
`
`If no indication on the record is made, all information disclosed during a
`
`deposition
`
`shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless otherwise agreed,
`
`until the time within which it may be appropriately designated as
`
`provided for herein has passed. Any Party that wishes to disclose the
`
`transcript that has been deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” as a result of no designation having been
`
`made on the record at the time the testimony was given, or information
`
`contained therein, may provide written notice of its intent to treat the
`
`transcript as non-confidential, after which time, any Party that wants to
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2176 Page 11 of 43
`
`maintain any portion of the transcript as confidential must designate the
`
`confidential portions within fourteen (14) days, or else the transcript may
`
`be treated as non-confidential. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony
`
`or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be
`
`separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to
`
`anyone except as permitted under this Protective Order.
`(e) Each Party shall give the other Party notice if it reasonably
`
`expects a deposition, hearing or other proceeding to include Protected
`
`Material so that the other Party can ensure that only authorized
`
`individuals are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as
`
`an exhibit at a deposition shall not in any way affect its designation as
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`
`ONLY – SOURCE CODE.”
`(f)
`
`Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an
`
`obvious legend on the title page that the transcript contains Protected
`
`Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all pages
`
`(including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as
`
`Protected Material and the level of protection being asserted by the
`
`Designating Party. The Designating Party shall inform the court reporter
`
`of these requirements.
`(g)
`
`In the event the video of a deposition is recorded, the
`
`original and all copies of the recording shall be marked by the video
`
`technician to indicate that the contents of the recording are subject to this
`
`Protective Order, substantially along the lines of “This recording
`
`contains confidential testimony used in this case and is not to be viewed
`
`or the contents thereof to be displayed or revealed except pursuant to the
`
`terms of the operative Protective Order in this matter or pursuant to
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`10
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2177 Page 12 of 43
`
`
`
`written stipulation of the Parties.”
`(h) Counsel for any Producing Party shall have the right to
`
`exclude from oral depositions, other than the deponent, deponent’s
`
`counsel, Outside Counsel of Record for other Parties, the reporter and
`
`videographer (if any), any person who is not authorized by this
`
`Protective Order to receive or access Protected Material based on the
`
`designation of such Protected Material. Such right of exclusion shall be
`
`applicable only during periods of examination or testimony regarding
`
`such Protected Material.
`(i)
`
`For all other information or tangible items, that the
`
`Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the
`
`container or containers in which the information or item is stored the
`
`label
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL,”
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
`
`–
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE.”
`
`5.5
`
`Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent
`
`failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the
`
`Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Protective Order for such
`
`material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make
`
`reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the
`
`provisions of this Protective Order. Following a correction of a designation, the
`
`Producing Party shall provide re-labeled copies of the information or items to each
`
`Receiving Party reflecting the change in designation.
`
`6.
`
`CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
`6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a
`
`designation of confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating
`
`Party’s confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial
`
`unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`11
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2178 Page 13 of 43
`
`
`
`litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation
`
`by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is
`
`disclosed.
`6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute
`
`resolution process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging
`
`and describing the basis for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a
`
`challenge has been made, the written notice must recite that the challenge to
`
`confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific section of the Protective
`
`Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must begin
`
`the process by conferring directly (in voice-to-voice dialogue; other forms of
`
`communication are not sufficient) within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of
`
`notice. In conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that
`
`the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an
`
`opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and,
`
`if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation.
`
`A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it
`
`has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the Designating
`
`Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner.
`6.3
`
`Judicial Intervention. In the event of a dispute over a confidentiality
`
`designation under this Protective Order, a Challenging Party may file a motion
`
`challenging a confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing
`
`so, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript or any portions
`
`thereof. Any motion brought by a Challenging Party pursuant to this provision must
`
`be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied
`
`with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding section (Section
`
`6.2).
`
`6.4 The burden of persuasion in any challenge proceeding shall be on the
`
`Designating Party. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`12
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2179 Page 14 of 43
`
`
`
`designation by failing to file a response to a motion to challenge confidentiality as
`
`described above, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level
`
`of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the
`
`Court rules on the challenge.
`
`7.
`
`ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
`7.1 Basic Principles. All Protected Material shall be used solely for this case
`
`or any related appellate proceeding, and not for any other purpose whatsoever,
`
`including without limitation any other litigation, patent prosecution or acquisition,
`
`patent reexamination or reissue proceedings, or any business or competitive purpose
`
`or function. Protected Material shall not be distributed, disclosed or made available
`
`to anyone except as expressly provided in this Protective Order or another Order of
`
`this Court. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply
`
`with the provisions of Sections 4.1, 14.5 and 15.1 herein. Nothing herein shall prevent
`
`the Parties from entering into an agreement for the cross-use and/or coordination of
`
`discovery materials in this Action and any other action.
`7.2 Patent Prosecution Bar. Absent the written consent of the Producing
`
`Party, any person who receives access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE” information shall not be involved, directly or
`
`indirectly, in any of the following activities: (i) advising on, consulting on, preparing,
`
`prosecuting, drafting, editing, and/or amending of patent applications, specifications,
`
`claims, and/or responses to office actions, or otherwise affecting the scope of claims
`
`in patents or patent applications relating to Relevant Technology, before any foreign
`
`or domestic agency, including the United States Patent and Trademark Office; and (ii)
`
`the acquisition of patents (including patent applications), or the rights to any such
`
`patents or patent applications with the right to sublicense, relating to Relevant
`
`Technology. These prohibitions are not intended to and shall not (i) preclude Counsel
`
`from participating in proceedings on behalf of a Party challenging the validity of any
`PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
`Case No. 3:17-CV-02403-CAB-MDD
`13
`CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-02403-CAB-MDD Document 149-1 Filed 07/26/18 PageID.2180 Page 15 of 43
`
`
`
`patent or on behalf of a Party responding to a challenge to the validity of a patent, or
`
`(ii) preclude Counsel from participating directly or indirectly in reexamination, inter
`
`partes review, covered business method review, or reissue proceedings on behalf of a
`
`patentee. These prohibitions shall begin when the affected individual first receives
`
`access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE”
`
`materials until two (2) years after the date the affected individual ceases to have access
`
`to the materials.
`
`(a) Development Bar. Absent the written consent of the
`
`Producing Party, any Outside Counsel of Record or Expert who receives
`
`access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE
`
`CODE” information shall not be involved in performing hardware or software
`
`development work or product development work directly or indirectly
`
`intended for commercial purposes relating to Relevant Technology. These
`
`prohibitions shall begin when the affected individual first has access to
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY – SOURCE CODE”
`
`materials until two (2) years after the date the affected individual ceases to
`
`have access to the materials.
`7.3 Secure Storage, No Export. The Parties acknowledge that certain
`
`Protected Material may be subject to U.S. government export control and economic
`
`sanctions laws. To the extent required by such regulations or laws, including the U.S.
`
`Export Administration Regulations, Protected Material must be stored and maintained
`
`by a Receiving Party at a location in the United States and in a secure manner that
`
`ensures

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket