`
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 834-4 Filed 11/30/20 PageID.40060 Page 2 of 5
`
`Jason Wolff
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Subject:
`
`FTF
`
`Jason Wolff
`Monday, November 16, 2020 4:22 PM
`Finjan/ESET FR Internal
`FW: Finjan-ESET: ESET & ESET SPOL S.R.O.'s Amended Notice of Subpoenas and
`Amended Notice of Rule 30(b)(1) Depositions
`
`From: Hannah, James <JHannah@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 3:32 PM
`To: SPenner@foley.com; KSteinbrenner@foley.com; Andre, Paul <PAndre@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Kobialka, Lisa
`<LKobialka@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Hannah <HLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Frankel, Aaron
`<AFrankel@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Martinez, Cristina <CMartinez@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Wells, Benu C.
`<BWells@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; molinzock@kramerlevin.com; Lien, Hien <HLien@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Proctor, Greg
`<GProctor@KRAMERLEVIN.com>; Lee, Michael H. <MHLee@KRAMERLEVIN.com>
`Cc: NPisano@foley.com; JPatino@foley.com; JEGray@foley.com; CBolten@foley.com; ESET‐Finjan@foley.com
`Subject: RE: Finjan‐ESET: ESET & ESET SPOL S.R.O.'s Amended Notice of Subpoenas and Amended Notice of Rule 30(b)(1)
`Depositions
`
`Scott, we disagree with your characterizations and, frankly, are shocked that you continue to attempt to raise the
`litigation costs in this case. To be clear, we will not be making Mr. Touboul and Mr. Ben‐Itzhak available again in this
`case for a number of reasons, including that they are third parties, extremely busy, and located overseas. This will be
`your opportunity to ask questions regarding the ‘305 Patent if you choose to do so.
`
`James
`
`James Hannah
`Partner
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025
`T 650.752.1712 F 650.752.1812
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`From: SPenner@foley.com [mailto:SPenner@foley.com]
`Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 3:20 PM
`To: Hannah, James; KSteinbrenner@foley.com; Andre, Paul; Kobialka, Lisa; Lee, Hannah; Frankel, Aaron; Martinez,
`Cristina; Wells, Benu C.; molinzock@kramerlevin.com; Lien, Hien; Proctor, Greg; Lee, Michael H.
`Cc: NPisano@foley.com; JPatino@foley.com; JEGray@foley.com; CBolten@foley.com; ESET-Finjan@foley.com
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 834-4 Filed 11/30/20 PageID.40061 Page 3 of 5
`
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Finjan-ESET: ESET & ESET SPOL S.R.O.'s Amended Notice of Subpoenas and Amended Notice
`of Rule 30(b)(1) Depositions
`
`Dear James,
`
`Discovery relating to the ’305 patent is stayed. While the Court did permit ESET the ability to question third‐
`party witnesses regarding the ’305 patent even with the stay in place, the Court did not require that such
`testimony be taken nor can Finjan force ESET to do so at this time.
`
`To the extent the ’305 patent survives IPR and the stay is lifted in this case, ESET will decide at that time
`whether a follow‐up deposition of either Mr. Touboul or Mr. Ben‐tzhak will be necessary relating to the ’305
`patent.
`
`ESET rejects Finjan’s unilateral effort to force ESET to take discovery on a stayed patent.
`
`Best Regards,
`
`‐‐Scott
`
`Scott A. Penner
`P 858.847.6785
`
`Visit Foley.com
`
`From: Hannah, James [mailto:JHannah@KRAMERLEVIN.com]
`Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 3:07 PM
`To: Steinbrenner, Karrie A.; Andre, Paul; Kobialka, Lisa; Lee, Hannah; Frankel, Aaron; Martinez, Cristina; Wells, Benu C.;
`molinzock@kramerlevin.com; Lien, Hien; Proctor, Greg; Lee, Michael H.
`Cc: Pisano, Nick; Patiño, Joe; Gray, Justin E.; Penner, Scott A.; Bolten, Chris
`Subject: RE: Finjan-ESET: ESET & ESET SPOL S.R.O.'s Amended Notice of Subpoenas and Amended Notice of Rule
`30(b)(1) Depositions
`
`Counsel, please note that we will only producing Mr. Ben‐Itzhak and Mr. Touboul once in this matter. As such, if you
`have any questions regarding the ‘305 Patent, please be prepared to ask them at their depositions. Thanks.
`
`James
`
`James Hannah
`Partner
`
`Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
`990 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025
`T 650.752.1712 F 650.752.1812
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`
`Bio
`
`This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is
`confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
`this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
`Thank you for your cooperation.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 834-4 Filed 11/30/20 PageID.40062 Page 4 of 5
`
`From: KSteinbrenner@foley.com [mailto:KSteinbrenner@foley.com]
`Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 2:50 PM
`To: Andre, Paul; Kobialka, Lisa; Hannah, James; Lee, Hannah; Frankel, Aaron; Martinez, Cristina; Wells, Benu C.;
`molinzock@kramerlevin.com; Lien, Hien; Proctor, Greg; Lee, Michael H.
`Cc: NPisano@foley.com; JPatino@foley.com; JEGray@foley.com; SPenner@foley.com; CBolten@foley.com;
`KSteinbrenner@foley.com
`Subject: [EXTERNAL] Finjan-ESET: ESET & ESET SPOL S.R.O.'s Amended Notice of Subpoenas and Amended Notice of
`Rule 30(b)(1) Depositions
`
`Counsel:
`
`Attached please find courtesy copies of the following:
`
`(1) ESET, LLC and ESET SPOL. S.R.O.’S Amended Notice of Rule 30(b)(1) Deposition of Michael Noonan;
`
`(2) ESET, LLC and ESET SPOL. S.R.O.’S Amended Notice of Subpoena of Yuval Ben‐Itzhak;
`
`(3) ESET, LLC and ESET SPOL. S.R.O.’S Amended Notice of Rule 30(b)(1) Deposition of Philip Harstein;
`
`(4) ESET, LLC and ESET SPOL. S.R.O.’S Amended Notice of Subpoena of Shlomo Touboul; and
`
`(5) ESET, LLC and ESET SPOL. S.R.O.’S Amended Notice of Subpoena of David Kroll
`
`Copies have also been served via U.S. Mail today.
`
`Regards,
`
`Karrie A. Steinbrenner
`Assistant to Jose L. Patiño, Scott A. Penner,
` and Christopher C. Bolten
`
`Foley & Lardner LLP
`3579 Valley Centre Drive | Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130
`P 858.847.6748 | F 858.792.6773
`
`Visit Foley.com
`
`The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the attorney-client or work-product
`privileges. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received
`this message in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and
`(iii) erase or destroy the message and any attachments or copies. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or
`reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.
`Unintended transmission does not constitute waiver of the attorney-client privilege or any other privilege. Legal
`advice contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley & Lardner LLP client(s)
`represented by the Firm in the particular matter that is the subject of this message, and may not be relied upon
`3
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 834-4 Filed 11/30/20 PageID.40063 Page 5 of 5
`
`by any other party. Unless expressly stated otherwise, nothing contained in this message should be construed as
`a digital or electronic signature, nor is it intended to reflect an intention to make an agreement by electronic
`means.
`
`The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the attorney-client or work-product
`privileges. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received
`this message in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and
`(iii) erase or destroy the message and any attachments or copies. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or
`reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.
`Unintended transmission does not constitute waiver of the attorney-client privilege or any other privilege. Legal
`advice contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley & Lardner LLP client(s)
`represented by the Firm in the particular matter that is the subject of this message, and may not be relied upon
`by any other party. Unless expressly stated otherwise, nothing contained in this message should be construed as
`a digital or electronic signature, nor is it intended to reflect an intention to make an agreement by electronic
`means.
`
`4
`
`