Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 768 Filed 03/02/20 PageID.38032 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`NICOLA A. PISANO, CA Bar No. 151282
` NicolaPisano@eversheds-sutherland.com
`JOSE L. PATIÑO, CA Bar No. 149568
`
`JosePatino@eversheds-sutherland.com
`JUSTIN E. GRAY, CA Bar No. 282452
`
`JustinGray@eversheds-sutherland.com
`SCOTT A. PENNER, CA Bar No. 253716
` ScottPenner@eversheds-sutherland.com
`EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND (US) LLP
`12255 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 100
`SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92130
`TELEPHONE:
`858.252.6502
`FACSIMILE:
`858.252.6503
`Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs
`ESET, LLC and ESET, SPOL. S.R.O.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
` Case No. 3:17-cv-0183-CAB-BGS
`ESET, LLC AND ESET, SPOL. S.R.O.’S
`PROPOSED SPECIAL VERDICT
`FORM
`
`Judge: Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`ESET, LLC, et al.,
`Defendants.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17cv0183
`
`
`
`
`44093071.2
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 768 Filed 03/02/20 PageID.38033 Page 2 of 6
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1(f)(9)(b), Defendants ESET, LLC and ESET,
`spol. s.r.o. (collectively, “ESET”) submit their proposed special verdict form.
`Dated: March 2, 2020
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND (US) LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Nicola A. Pisano
`NICOLA A. PISANO, CA Bar No. 151282
` NicolaPisano@eversheds-sutherland.com
`JOSE L. PATIÑO, CA Bar No. 149568
`
`JosePatino@eversheds-sutherland.com
`JUSTIN E. GRAY, CA Bar No. 282452
`
`JustinGray@eversheds-sutherland.com
`SCOTT A. PENNER, CA Bar No. 253716
` ScottPenner@eversheds-sutherland.com
`12255 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 100
`SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92130
`TELEPHONE:
`858.252.6502
`FACSIMILE:
`858.252.6503
`Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs
`ESET, LLC and ESET, SPOL. S.R.O.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`44093071.2
`
`1
`
`17cv0183
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 768 Filed 03/02/20 PageID.38034 Page 3 of 6
`
`
`I.
`
`When answering the following questions and filling out this special verdict form,
`please follow the directions provided throughout this special verdict form and the final
`charge to the jury.
`We, the jury, unanimously find as follows:
`INFRINGEMENT
`Question 1. Has Finjan proven by a preponderance of the evidence that any of
`ESET, LLC or ESET spol. s.r.o.’s accused products infringe any of the claims of the
`Asserted Patents?
`A “yes” is a finding for Finjan, a “no” is a finding for ESET, LLC and ESET
`spol. s.r.o.
`YES _____ NO _____
`
`If you answered “yes,” please mark the claim(s) you found to be infringed, the
`specific products that infringe each such claim, and circle whether you found the
`infringement to be literal or under the doctrine of equivalents (“DOE”) in the table on
`the following page. If you answered “no,” please skip to Question 2.
`DESCRIPTION
`ACCUSED PRODUCTS
`Consumer Windows products
`ESET Endpoint Security
`ESET Endpoint Antivirus
`ESET Cyber Security
`ESET Internet Security
`ESET Mail Security
`ESET File Security
`ESET Gateway Security
`ESET Mail Security
`ESET Gateway Security
`ESET Virtual Environment Security
`ESET Cyber Security
`ESET Mail Security
`LiveGrid Reputation System
`LiveGrid Feedback System
`Cloud Malware Protection System
`Augur (Machine Learning)
`ESET Dynamic Threat Defense / Enterprise
`Cloud Malware Protection System
`ESET Threat Intelligence
`Enterprise Inspector
`2
`
`Consumer Linux products
`
`Consumer Mac products
`
`LiveGrid Reputation System
`LiveGrid Feedback System
`CMPS
`Other (Augur, EDTD/ECMPS, ETI,
`EI)
`
`
`
`44093071.2
`
`17cv0183
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 768 Filed 03/02/20 PageID.38035 Page 4 of 6
`
`
`  
`
`ESET spol. s.r.o. 
`
`ESET, LLC 
`
`Other (Augur, EDTD/ECMPS, ETI, EI) 
`
`CMPS 
`
`LiveGrid Feedback System 
`
`LiveGrid Reputation System 
`
`Consumer Mac products 
`
`Consumer Linux products 
`
`Consumer Windows products 
`
` 
`
`Other (Augur, EDTD/ECMPS, ETI, EI) 
`
`CMPS 
`
`LiveGrid Feedback System 
`
`LiveGrid Reputation System 
`
`Consumer Mac products 
`
`Consumer Linux products 
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`Consumer Windows products 
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
` 
` 
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
` '844 Claim 1  
`(literal / DOE) 
` '844 Claim 7  
`(literal) 
` '844 Claim 11  
`(literal / DOE) 
` '844 Claim 15  
`(literal / DOE) 
` '844 Claim 16  
`(literal / DOE) 
` '780 Claim 9  
`(literal / DOE) 
` '780 Claim 13  
`(literal) 
` '086 Claim 24  
`(literal / DOE) 
` '086 Claim 42  
`(literal / DOE) 
` '621 Claim 1  
`(literal / DOE) 
` '621 Claim 6  
`(literal) 
` '621 Claim 7  
`(literal) 
` '621 Claim 10  
`(literal / DOE) 
` '755 Claim 3  
`(literal / DOE) 
` '755 Claim 5  
`(literal) 
` '755 Claim 6  
`(literal) 
`
` 
`
`
`
`44093071.2
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`3
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`17cv0183
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`  
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 768 Filed 03/02/20 PageID.38036 Page 5 of 6
`
`
`II.
`
`’780 Patent
`
`’086 Patent
`
`INVALIDITY
`Question 2. Has ESET, LLC and ESET spol. s.r.o. proven by clear and
`convincing evidence that any of the claims of the Asserted Patents are invalid due to
`being anticipated, obvious, indefinite, abandoned, failing to meet the written description
`requirement, improper inventorship, or failing to be enabled?
`A “yes” is a finding for ESET, LLC and ESET spol. s.r.o., a “no” is a finding for
`Finjan.
`YES _____ NO _____
`
`If you answered “yes,” please mark the claim(s) you found to be invalid.
`’844 Patent
`Claim 1 _____
`Claim 7 _____
`Claim 11 _____
`Claim 15 _____
`Claim 16 _____
`Claim 9 _____
`Claim 13 _____
`Claim 18 _____
`Claim 1 _____
`Claim 9 _____
`Claim 24 _____
`Claim 42 _____
`Claim 1 _____
`Claim 6 _____
`Claim 7 _____
`Claim 10 _____
`Claim 3 _____
`Claim 5 _____
`Claim 6 _____
`
`’621 Patent
`
`’755 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`44093071.2
`
`4
`
`17cv0183
`
`

`

`Case 3:17-cv-00183-CAB-BGS Document 768 Filed 03/02/20 PageID.38037 Page 6 of 6
`
`
`III. DEFENSES
`Question 3. Has ESET, LLC and ESET spol. s.r.o. proven prosecution laches by
`proving by clear and convincing evidence that there was an unreasonably long delay in
`filing the claims of an asserted patent and that ESET, LLC and ESET spol. s.r.o. will be
`prejudiced if Finjan is entitled to enforce the patent despite the unreasonable delay in
`securing the claims of the patent that Finjan is barred from enforcing its patent claims?
`A “yes” is a finding for ESET, LLC and ESET spol. s.r.o., a “no” is a finding for
`Finjan.
`YES _____ NO _____
`
`If you answered “yes,” please mark the patent(s) in which prosecution laches
`applies.
`
`’086 patent _____
`’621 patent _____
`’755 patent _____
`Question 4. ESET’s Consumer Windows products, as identified above, are
`accused of infringing all asserted claims of the ’780 patent, claims 24 and 42 of the ’086
`patent, all asserted claims of the ’621 patent, and all asserted claims of the ’755 patent.
`Irrespective of whether you found infringement, are ESET’s Consumer Windows
`products licensed to these claims under the Microsoft license?
`A “yes” is a finding for ESET, LLC and ESET spol. s.r.o., a “no” is a finding for
`Finjan.
`
`
`IV. DAMAGES
`Question 5. If you found any claim of the Asserted Patents to be infringed, valid,
`and not subject to a defense identified above, Finjan is entitled to a payment of
`$____________________.
`
`YES _____ NO _____
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`* * * * *
`You have now reached the end of the verdict form and should review it to ensure it
`accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Presiding Juror should then sign
`and date the verdict form in the spaced below and notify the Security Guard that you have
`reached a verdict. The Presiding Juror should retain possession of the verdict form and
`bring it when the jury is brought back into the courtroom.
`
`Dated: _____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________
` PRESIDING JUROR
`
`
`
`
`
`44093071.2
`
`5
`
`17cv0183
`
`